elFinder is an open-source file manager for web, written in JavaScript using jQuery UI. Prior to 2.1.70, elFinder URL uploads in php/elFinder.class.php can bypass server-side request forgery protections when PHP cURL is unavailable because validate_address() validates $info['ip'], but get_remote_contents() selects fsock_get_contents(), which connects to $arr['host'] and performs a second DNS resolution. An attacker able to submit a URL upload can use DNS rebinding to have the first resolution return a public address and the connection resolution return a loopback or private address, causing the internal HTTP response body to be stored as an uploaded file and made readable through elFinder. After a successful fetch, get_headers($url, true) separately requests the original hostname without reusing the validated and pinned connection, creating an additional blind server-side request forgery path even when curl_get_contents() is selected. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.70.
CVE-2026-81889
This high-severity CVE scores 8.6 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 73% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 8.6
- EG Score
- 8.6(medium)
- EG Risk
- 70(Attend)EG Risk 70/100SSVC: Attend
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity86% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Remediate soon — notable exploitation risk. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 27%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 31, 2026
Last Modified
September 9, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Aug 31, 2026Version 2.1.70
Patch available: Studio-42/elFinder 2.1.70
https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/releases/tag/2.1.70commit 6d997386cd0f (Studio-42/elFinder)
Fix landed in Studio-42/elFinder commit 6d997386cd0f — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/commit/6d997386cd0f1abab4706c220b46b0aea0ecff51commit 191372c1bbeb (Studio-42/elFinder)
Patch available: Studio-42/elFinder 2.1.70 (contains commit 191372c1bbeb)
https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/commit/191372c1bbebbd36fb55af79a84b9984861390ffSSRF protection bypass via DNS rebinding in the `fsock_get_contents()` fallback · Advisory · Studio-42/elFinder · GitHub
https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/security/advisories/GHSA-8x3q-jpjh-qh5cVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-81889(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Packagist(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| studio-42/elfinder | 2.0.3 ... 2.1.9 (77 versions) | 2.1.70 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 11× in last 7d / 33× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-18 22:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 23:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 00:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 12:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 13:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-14 03:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 17:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 18:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 19:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 23:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-08 02:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 15:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-05 17:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 18:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 06:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-03 19:23 UTCEG score recompute
Show 8 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-03 18:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-02 20:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 20:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-31 21:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-31 20:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-31 20:34 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-81889?
When was CVE-2026-81889 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-81889 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-81889?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-81889?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-81889
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-81889?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.