CVE-2026-81692

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-27. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

openssl_encrypt (pip: openssl-encrypt) versions 1.4.8 and earlier fail to validate the 36-bit STREAMINFO total_samples field of FLAC files before using it to size an allocation (np.random.randint(size=(total_samples, channels))). A ~50-byte crafted FLAC file declaring ~100 million samples causes a multi-gigabyte memory allocation, leading to out-of-memory denial of service during 'decrypt --stego-extract'. The issue is fixed in 1.4.9; both the 1.4.x and 1.5.x lines are affected.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5(high)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
28%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 27, 2026

Last Modified

August 31, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 27, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github.
generic

openssl_encrypt before 1.4.9 Denial of Service via STREAMINFO | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openssl-encrypt-before-1.4.9-denial-of-service-via-streaminfo
github Patch Available

FLAC total_samples drives a multi-gigabyte allocation · Advisory · jahlives/openssl_encrypt · GitHub

https://github.com/jahlives/openssl_encrypt/security/advisories/GHSA-wr9q-p3rj-vqq7

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-81692(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 24× in last 7d / 88× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-19 11:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-18 22:54 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-18 22:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-18 09:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-17 20:55 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-17 20:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-17 03:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-16 14:55 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-16 14:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-16 01:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-15 12:52 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-15 12:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-14 23:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-14 10:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-13 21:51 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-13 21:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-13 08:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-12 19:51 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-12 19:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-12 06:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 63 more
  1. 2026-09-11 17:51 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-11 17:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-11 04:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-10 15:51 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-10 15:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-10 02:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-09 13:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-09 00:41 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-09 00:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-08 06:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-07 17:49 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-07 17:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-07 04:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-06 15:50 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-06 15:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-06 02:50 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-06 02:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-05 13:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-05 00:47 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-05 00:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-09-04 11:46 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-04 11:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-09-03 22:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-03 09:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-09-02 20:43 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-02 20:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-09-02 07:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-09-01 18:40 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-01 18:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-09-01 05:38 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-01 05:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-08-31 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-31 16:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-08-31 16:01 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-08-31 16:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-31 12:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-08-30 23:29 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-30 23:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-30 19:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-08-30 10:29 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-30 10:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-08-29 21:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-29 08:28 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-29 08:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-08-28 19:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-08-28 06:25 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-28 06:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-27 17:25 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-27 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-27 16:43 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-81692?
CVE-2026-81692 is a high vulnerability published on August 27, 2026. opensslencrypt (pip: openssl-encrypt) versions 1.4.8 and earlier fail to validate the 36-bit STREAMINFO totalsamples field of FLAC files before using it to size an allocation (np.random.randint(size=(total_samples, channels))). A ~50-byte crafted FLAC file declaring ~100 million samples causes a…
When was CVE-2026-81692 disclosed?
CVE-2026-81692 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 27, 2026, with the most recent update on August 31, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-81692 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-81692 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 72.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-81692?
CVE-2026-81692 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-81692?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-81692, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-81692

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-81692?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.