CVE-2026-80798

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scoredTrending — 3 sources updated this week
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS v2: Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nfc: llcp: reject PDUs shorter than the LLCP header

Every LLCP PDU begins with a two-byte header (DSAP/SSAP + PTYPE), but the receive path never checked that a frame is at least LLCP_HEADER_SIZE bytes before parsing it.

nfc_llcp_rx_skb() reads the header via nfc_llcp_ptype()/nfc_llcp_dsap()/ nfc_llcp_ssap(), which dereference pdu->data[0] and pdu->data[1], and a CONNECT or CC PDU then computes

tlv_array_len = skb->len - LLCP_HEADER_SIZE;

as a size_t and hands it to the TLV walk. When the frame is shorter than the header the subtraction wraps to a huge value and the walk runs far past the buffer, an out-of-bounds read.

A nearby NFC device can reach this without authentication; LLCP link activation happens automatically after NFC-DEP.

Guard the common receive choke point __nfc_llcp_recv(), shared by both the target (nfc_llcp_data_received()) and initiator (nfc_llcp_recv()) paths, so a short skb is dropped before the rx_work worker parses it. Use pskb_may_pull() rather than a skb->len test so the two header bytes are guaranteed to sit in the skb linear area even for a non-linear skb, matching how the sibling NCI and HCI receive paths validate their headers.

Reproduced with a KFENCE out-of-bounds read via /dev/virtual_nci on linux-next.

Found by 0sec automated security-research tooling (https://0sec.ai).

CVSS v3
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
EG Risk
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
15%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 4, 2026

Last Modified

September 4, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-80798(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (56 versions)6.1.187-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (34 versions)6.12.107-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (169 versions)7.1.12-1

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 21× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-17 20:23 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-17 20:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-14 13:22 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-14 13:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-11 06:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-07 23:26 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-07 23:26 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-07 23:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-04 16:22 UTCNVD update
  20. 2026-09-04 15:29 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-04 15:29 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-80798?
CVE-2026-80798 is a publicly disclosed vulnerability published on September 4, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfc: llcp: reject PDUs shorter than the LLCP header Every LLCP PDU begins with a two-byte header (DSAP/SSAP + PTYPE), but the receive path never checked that a frame is at least LLCPHEADERSIZE bytes before parsing it.…
When was CVE-2026-80798 disclosed?
CVE-2026-80798 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 4, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-80798 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-80798 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 85.4% of all scored CVEs.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-80798?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-80798, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-80798

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-80798?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.