SEP sesam before 5.2.0.24 mishandles User Authorization with MFA. If AD authentication is configured and MFA is enforced, an attacker can create a second OTP access capability. SEP sesam and Active Directory handle username capitalization differently, which may allow multiple SEP sesam user accounts to be created for the same Active Directory (AD) account. Active Directory treats usernames as case-insensitive, while SEP sesam distinguishes between different letter casing. As a result, the same AD user can be represented by multiple SEP sesam user accounts that differ only in username capitalization. When Active Directory authentication is configured and multi-factor authentication (MFA) is enforced, this behavior may allow an additional OTP Authenticator to be registered for the same AD account, reducing the effectiveness of MFA protection.
CVE-2026-79300
Score 3.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: LOW) published 2026-09-13. a secondary CVSS source baseline 3.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 3.5
- EG Score
- 3.5(high)
- EG Risk
- 16(Track)EG Risk 16/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity35% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 12%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 12, 2026
Last Modified
September 14, 2026
References (1)
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-79300(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 14× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 10:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 10:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-14 17:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 17:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-14 16:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 16:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-12 23:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 22:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 22:27 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-79300?
When was CVE-2026-79300 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-79300 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-79300?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-79300?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-79300
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-79300?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.