In NLnetLabs Unbound 1.20.0 up to and including 1.26.0, a vulnerability on the 'serve-expired' code path can cause a double decrement on the 'wait-limit' counter per client IP essentially bypassing one of the counter measures that was introduced for DNSBomb (CVE-2024-33655). A malicious actor can exploit this by controlling an authoritative zone with short TTL, so cached entries expire quickly. Each 'slow' query, one the attacker's authoritative never answers, is followed by one query for an expired cached name, which is answered immediately via the 'serve-expired' path and decrements the counter twice. This second query was named 'pump'. By alternating slow queries and pumps, the attacker keeps the per-client counter at or below the configured 'wait-limit' indefinitely, and can hold an arbitrary number of pending queries from a single source IP, up to the global mesh quota (num-queries-per-thread); eventually bypassing one of the counter measures introduced for DNSBomb (CVE-2024-33655). This vulnerability is present on the 'serve-expired' code path.
CVE-2026-77860
Score 3.7 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: LOW) published 2026-09-16. a secondary CVSS source baseline 3.7; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 3.7
- EG Score
- 3.7(high)
- EG Risk
- 17(Track)EG Risk 17/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity37% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 20%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 16, 2026
Last Modified
September 16, 2026
References (1)
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-77860(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(1)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 14× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-19 13:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 13:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 13:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 19:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 15:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 15:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 14:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 09:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 09:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 08:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 08:41 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-77860?
When was CVE-2026-77860 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-77860 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-77860?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-77860?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-77860
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-77860?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.