CVE-2026-76806

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.36.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This medium-severity CVE scores 6.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (16th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-117055 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

6.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 6.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Solidtime is an open-source time-tracking app. Prior to 0.16.0, TogglDataImporter::importData() read attacker-controlled project id values from projects.json in uploaded ZIP imports and concatenated them into filesystem paths without validation. Because Spatie\TemporaryDirectory\TemporaryDirectory::path() creates missing parent directories, traversal sequences could escape the temporary sandbox and create directories at arbitrary writable host paths. Distinguishable ImportController responses for existing versus missing targets exposed whether suffix-constrained host paths derived from projects_users/{id}.json or tasks/{id}.json existed, because the importer always appended .json. Any registered user able to create an organization and use POST /api/v1/organizations/{org}/import with type=toggl_data_importer could reach the flaw, potentially causing minor availability impact through directory exhaustion and disclosing host layout information. This issue is fixed in version 0.16.0.

CVSS v3
6.3
EG Score
6.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
28
EG Risk 28/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity63% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
16th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (6.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
6.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 4, 2026

Last Modified

November 12, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Nov 9, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit, github_release.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)🟡 PoC Available

Path Traversal in Toggl ZIP Data Importer - arbitrary directory creation + filesystem existence oracle · Advisory · solidtime-io/solidtime · GitHub

https://github.com/solidtime-io/solidtime/security/advisories/GHSA-cj49-589g-wp6j
GitHub release Patch Available

0.16.0

Patch available: solidtime-io/solidtime v0.16.0

https://github.com/solidtime-io/solidtime/releases/tag/v0.16.0
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 53ecc585092e (solidtime-io/solidtime)

Patch available: solidtime-io/solidtime v0.16.0 (contains commit 53ecc585092e)

https://github.com/solidtime-io/solidtime/commit/53ecc585092e0d8fea651c1342b7acce64c601be

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-76806?
CVE-2026-76806 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 4, 2026. Solidtime is an open-source time-tracking app. Prior to 0.16.0, TogglDataImporter::importData() read attacker-controlled project id values from projects.json in uploaded ZIP imports and concatenated them into filesystem paths without validation. Because…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-76806 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-76806 was published on November 4, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 12, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-76806 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-76806 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (16th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-76806?
CVE-2026-76806 has a CVSS base score of 6.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-76806?
A fix for CVE-2026-76806 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-76806

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-76806?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.