CVE-2026-76795

HIGHPre-NVD 7.37.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-08-20. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-63190 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 7.3Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A vulnerability has been found in AeternaLabsHQ PullMD 3.2.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /api of the component REST API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 3.3.0 will fix this issue. The identifier of the patch is 96448894cc93ccecb0bdcbf263a9d25390a8455e. Upgrading the affected component is advised.

CVSS v3
7.3
EG Score
7.3HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
64
EG Risk 64/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity73% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
49th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.3 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-10). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 20, 2026

Last Modified

August 25, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 20, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_pr, github_commit, github_release.
Web page

GitHub - AeternaLabsHQ/pullmd: Self-hosted URL- and file-to-Markdown service for humans and AI agents - web pages, documents, images, audio, YouTube. PWA + REST + MCP + Claude Code skill, Reddit-aware, refreshable share links. · GitHub

https://github.com/AeternaLabsHQ/pullmd/
GitHub release Patch Available

v3.3.0

Patch available: AeternaLabsHQ/pullmd v3.3.0

https://github.com/AeternaLabsHQ/pullmd/releases/tag/v3.3.0
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 96448894cc93 (AeternaLabsHQ/pullmd)

Patch available: AeternaLabsHQ/pullmd v3.3.0 (contains commit 96448894cc93)

https://github.com/AeternaLabsHQ/pullmd/commit/96448894cc93ccecb0bdcbf263a9d25390a8455e
GitHub pull request Patch Available

fix(security): block SSRF to private/internal/metadata addresses (closes #41)

Patch available: AeternaLabsHQ/pullmd v3.3.0 (PR #42 merged 2026-07-08)

https://github.com/AeternaLabsHQ/pullmd/pull/42
Web page

[Security Vulnerability] Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) allows unauthorized access to cloud metadata and sensitive information · Issue #41 · AeternaLabsHQ/pullmd · GitHub

https://github.com/AeternaLabsHQ/pullmd/issues/41

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-76795(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 33× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 238 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 138 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  4. 2026-11-11 00:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-11 00:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  6. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  7. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  8. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  9. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  10. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  11. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  12. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  13. 2026-11-03 21:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-03 21:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  15. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  16. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  17. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  18. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  19. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  20. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  21. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  22. 2026-10-27 20:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-27 20:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  24. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  25. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  2. 2026-10-25 14:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  4. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  5. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  6. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  7. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  8. 2026-10-20 08:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-10-20 08:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  10. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  11. 2026-10-18 03:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  13. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  14. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  15. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  16. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  17. 2026-10-13 07:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-13 07:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  19. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  20. 2026-10-12 15:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-11 19:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-11 16:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-11 13:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  25. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  26. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  27. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  28. 2026-10-08 05:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-08 05:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  30. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  31. 2026-10-07 05:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  32. 2026-10-06 16:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-06 16:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  34. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  35. 2026-10-06 03:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-06 03:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  37. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  38. 2026-10-05 09:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-05 09:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  40. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  41. 2026-10-04 21:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  42. 2026-10-04 05:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  43. 2026-10-03 16:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-03 16:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  45. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  46. 2026-10-02 21:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-02 21:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  48. 2026-10-02 09:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  49. 2026-10-01 21:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-01 21:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  51. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  52. 2026-10-01 08:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  53. 2026-09-30 20:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-09-30 20:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  55. 2026-09-30 08:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-09-30 08:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  57. 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  58. 2026-09-28 21:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-09-28 21:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  60. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  61. 2026-09-28 04:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  62. 2026-09-27 16:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-09-27 16:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  64. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  65. 2026-09-27 04:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-09-27 04:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  67. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  68. 2026-09-26 00:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  69. 2026-09-25 08:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  70. 2026-09-24 20:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-09-24 20:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  72. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  73. 2026-09-24 08:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3
  74. 2026-09-23 20:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-09-23 20:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p53p-vh92-qhpp · GitHub CVSS 7.3

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-76795?
CVE-2026-76795 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 20, 2026. A vulnerability has been found in AeternaLabsHQ PullMD 3.2.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /api of the component REST API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-76795 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-76795 was published on August 20, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 25, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-76795 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-76795 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (49th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-76795?
CVE-2026-76795 has a CVSS base score of 7.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-76795?
A fix for CVE-2026-76795 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-76795 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-76795

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-76795?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.