CVE-2026-74411

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-15. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-59558 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-75cw-hg5p-hxfv (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

wifi: rtw89: Correct data type for scan index to avoid infinite loop

A kernel soft lockup was observed during Wi-Fi scanning on the 6GHz band. The CPU becomes stuck in rtw89_hw_scan_add_chan_ax for over 20 seconds, leading to a system panic.

RIP points to 0f b6 c3 (movzbl %bl, %eax), which zero-extends the low 8 bits of RBX into RAX. RBX (the counter i) has reached a huge value: 0x137466a1.

watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 26s! [kworker/u16:4:6124] Workqueue: events_unbound cfg80211_wiphy_work [cfg80211] RIP: 0010:rtw89_hw_scan_add_chan_ax+0xb3/0x6e0 [rtw89_core] Code: a0 48 89 45 a8 44 89 6d 9c 44 89 75 98 eb 29 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 83 c3 01 <0f> b6 c3 41 3b 44 24 74 0f 83 0b 02 00 00 0f b6 c3 48 8d 14 80 49 RSP: 0018:ffffcb48cbaa39f8 EFLAGS: 00000202 RAX: 0000000000000005 RBX: 00000000137466a1 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff89ffc9d851a8 RSI: 0000000000004f0d RDI: 0000000096af0130 RBP: ffffcb48cbaa3a60 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8a00b7502080 R10: ffff8a00b75ff600 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff89ffc7553870 R13: ffff8a00b7ac8f19 R14: ffff8a00b75020d8 R15: ffff89ffc3d54d80 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8a014f962000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007558d7f9f4c4 CR3: 0000000178040001 CR4: 00000000001706f0 Call Trace: rtw89_hw_scan_prep_chan_list_ax+0x8a/0x400 [rtw89_core] rtw89_hw_scan_start+0x546/0x8a0 [rtw89_core] ? rtw89_fw_h2c_default_cmac_tbl+0x13c/0x1f0 [rtw89_core] rtw89_ops_hw_scan+0xae/0x120 [rtw89_core] drv_hw_scan+0xbb/0x180 [mac80211] __ieee80211_start_scan+0x2fc/0x750 [mac80211] ieee80211_request_scan+0xe/0x20 [mac80211] ieee80211_scan+0x123/0x190 [mac80211] rdev_scan+0x40/0x110 [cfg80211] cfg80211_scan_6ghz+0x5a1/0xa30 [cfg80211]

By objdump with source:

for (i = 0; i < req->n_6ghz_params; i++) { 5fbc0: 83 c3 01 add $0x1,%ebx --> i++ 5fbc3: 0f b6 c3 movzbl %bl,%eax --> get counter fbc6: 41 3b 44 24 74 cmp 0x74(%r12),%eax

* RBX: 00000000137466a1 -> %bl = a1 -> EAX = 000000a1 (161)

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
34th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-07). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

October 16, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

wifi: rtw89: Correct data type for scan index to avoid infinite loop - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/966fbed4b4463fbcb49c5becf3f86eae776861bd
Web page

wifi: rtw89: Correct data type for scan index to avoid infinite loop - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7a1ab5fdcae896e20ca6d68fa0fbd2816cb7471f
Web page

wifi: rtw89: Correct data type for scan index to avoid infinite loop - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/140fa699cfd0e18ab2f1497acd951fb3548610f5
Web page

wifi: rtw89: Correct data type for scan index to avoid infinite loop - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/08fdcb529df6df3562dd2b0035f88dd5be8b3c68
Web page

wifi: rtw89: Correct data type for scan index to avoid infinite loop - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/05d46e30303275f21f13c951166d39c85df976d4

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74411(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(9)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (31 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.100-1: fixed in 6.12.100-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (161 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.5-1: fixed in 7.1.5-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(9)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 288 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 188 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  3. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  4. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  5. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  6. 2026-11-08 09:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-08 09:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-75cw-hg5p-hxfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  8. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  9. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  10. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  11. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  12. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  13. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  14. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  15. 2026-10-31 21:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-31 21:27 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-31 21:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-75cw-hg5p-hxfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  18. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  19. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  20. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  21. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  22. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  23. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  24. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  25. 2026-10-25 14:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-24 08:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-10-24 08:58 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-24 08:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-75cw-hg5p-hxfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  5. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  6. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-18 03:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-16 20:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-16 20:29 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-16 20:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-75cw-hg5p-hxfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  16. 2026-10-16 19:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-16 19:30 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-16 19:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-75cw-hg5p-hxfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  19. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-13 07:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-13 07:35 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-13 07:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-75cw-hg5p-hxfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  26. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  27. 2026-10-12 15:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-11 19:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-11 16:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-11 14:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  32. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  33. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  34. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  35. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  36. 2026-10-06 22:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-06 22:22 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-06 22:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-75cw-hg5p-hxfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  39. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  40. 2026-10-06 09:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-06 09:10 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-06 09:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-75cw-hg5p-hxfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  43. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  44. 2026-10-05 09:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-05 09:41 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-05 09:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-75cw-hg5p-hxfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  47. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  48. 2026-10-04 21:57 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-04 21:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-75cw-hg5p-hxfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  50. 2026-10-04 06:59 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-04 06:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-75cw-hg5p-hxfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  52. 2026-10-03 19:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-03 19:30 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-03 19:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-75cw-hg5p-hxfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  55. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  56. 2026-10-03 03:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-03 03:20 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-03 03:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-75cw-hg5p-hxfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  59. 2026-10-02 15:51 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-02 15:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-75cw-hg5p-hxfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  61. 2026-10-02 02:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-10-02 02:01 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-02 02:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-75cw-hg5p-hxfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  64. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  65. 2026-10-01 08:28 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-01 08:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-75cw-hg5p-hxfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  67. 2026-09-30 20:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-09-30 20:58 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-09-30 20:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-75cw-hg5p-hxfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  70. 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  71. 2026-09-28 23:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-09-28 23:45 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-28 23:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-75cw-hg5p-hxfv · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  74. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  75. 2026-09-28 10:15 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-74411?
CVE-2026-74411 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: rtw89: Correct data type for scan index to avoid infinite loop A kernel soft lockup was observed during Wi-Fi scanning on the 6GHz band. The CPU becomes stuck in rtw89_hw_scan_add_chan_ax for over 20 seconds, leading to a…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-74411 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-74411 was published on August 15, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 16, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-74411 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-74411 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (34th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74411?
CVE-2026-74411 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74411?
A fix for CVE-2026-74411 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-74411 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-74411

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74411?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.