CVE-2026-73564

HIGHPre-NVD 8.78.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This high-severity CVE scores 8.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (44th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-58179 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp (GitHub Security Advisories) · GO-2026-6103 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 8.7Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

frp is a fast reverse proxy. From 0.53.0 until 0.70.1, frp's optional SSH Tunnel Gateway in pkg/ssh/server.go parses an SSH exec channel request by adding 4 to an attacker-controlled four-byte big-endian length. A length of 0xFFFFFFFF makes the uint32 addition wrap to 3, defeats the payload bounds check, and causes payload[4:3] to panic in TunnelServer.handleNewChannel. When no authorized-keys file is configured, sshConfig.NoClientAuth permits an unauthenticated peer to reach this channel phase before the frp token is checked, so a single five-byte request terminates the frps process and drops every active tunnel. This issue is fixed in version 0.70.1.

CVSS
8.7
EG Score
8.7HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
70
EG Risk 70/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity87% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
44th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.7 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source
EG Likelihood
0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-10). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 13, 2026

Last Modified

October 24, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Aug 13, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github_release, github, github_pr.
GitHub release Patch Available

v0.70.1

Patch available: fatedier/frp v0.70.1

https://github.com/fatedier/frp/releases/tag/v0.70.1
GitHub commit

commit 7dc7be930e24 (fatedier/frp)

Fix landed in fatedier/frp commit 7dc7be930e24 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/fatedier/frp/commit/7dc7be930e2452ae93fd32f2a77f8c6fcd0b652b
GitHub pull request

ssh: fix malformed exec payload panic

Fix merged in fatedier/frp PR #5428 on 2026-07-21 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/fatedier/frp/pull/5428
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Unauthenticated Remote Denial of Service in the frp SSH Tunnel Gateway via Integer Overflow · Advisory · fatedier/frp · GitHub

https://github.com/fatedier/frp/security/advisories/GHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-73564(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
gogithub.com/fatedier/frp @ 0.70.1 (fixes >= 0.53.0, <= 0.70.0)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/fatedier/frp—
  • 0.53.0 up to 0.70.1: fixed in 0.70.1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 32× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 146 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 46 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  3. 2026-11-10 21:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-10 21:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp · GitHub severity HIGH
  5. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  6. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  7. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  8. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  9. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  10. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  11. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  12. 2026-11-03 21:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-03 21:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp · GitHub severity HIGH
  14. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  15. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  16. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  17. 2026-11-01 07:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp · GitHub severity HIGH
  18. 2026-11-01 07:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  20. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  21. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  22. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  23. 2026-10-27 21:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  25. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  2. 2026-10-25 14:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  4. 2026-10-23 18:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  6. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  7. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  8. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  9. 2026-10-20 08:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  11. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  12. 2026-10-18 03:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  14. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  15. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  16. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  17. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-13 07:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-12 15:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-11 19:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-11 16:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-11 14:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  26. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  27. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  28. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  29. 2026-10-07 01:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  31. 2026-10-06 13:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  33. 2026-10-05 14:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  35. 2026-10-03 19:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  37. 2026-10-02 19:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-02 07:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  40. 2026-09-30 21:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  42. 2026-09-29 03:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  44. 2026-09-28 00:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  46. 2026-09-27 09:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  48. 2026-09-25 03:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-09-23 21:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  51. 2026-09-22 21:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-09-21 21:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  54. 2026-09-19 20:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-09-18 20:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  57. 2026-09-18 00:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-09-16 23:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  60. 2026-09-16 07:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  62. 2026-09-15 06:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  64. 2026-09-13 17:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-09-12 17:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-09-12 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  67. 2026-09-11 17:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  69. 2026-09-10 17:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  71. 2026-09-09 04:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  73. 2026-09-07 17:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-09-06 15:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-73564?
CVE-2026-73564 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 13, 2026. frp is a fast reverse proxy. From 0.53.0 until 0.70.1, frp's optional SSH Tunnel Gateway in pkg/ssh/server.go parses an SSH exec channel request by adding 4 to an attacker-controlled four-byte big-endian length. A length of 0xFFFFFFFF makes the uint32 addition wrap to 3, defeats the payload bounds…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-73564 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-73564 was published on August 13, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 24, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-73564 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-73564 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (44th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-73564?
CVE-2026-73564 has a CVSS base score of 8.7 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-73564?
A fix for CVE-2026-73564 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-73564 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-73564

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-73564?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.