CVE-2026-73420

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.19.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.1 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.7% (54th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-58519 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-7rqj-j65f-68wh (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

NextAuth.js provides authentication for Next.js. Prior to @auth/core 0.41.3 and next-auth 4.24.15 and 5.0.0-beta.32, the defaultNormalizer used by the email and magic-link sign-in flow validates an address before applying Unicode normalization. An address can contain a Unicode character such as U+FF20 FULLWIDTH COMMERCIAL AT that is not ASCII at-sign but canonicalizes to an ASCII at-sign under NFKC or NFKD normalization. The address passes the normalizer's single-at-sign check, but a downstream sendVerificationRequest mail library or delivery service that normalizes the address can then see two at-sign separators and deliver the passwordless sign-in link to an attacker-controlled recipient. Applications are affected when the email provider uses the built-in normalizer rather than a custom normalizeIdentifier and the downstream sender applies Unicode normalization. An attacker who knows a victim's email address can request the misrouted magic link and sign in as the victim without victim interaction. This issue is fixed in @auth/core 0.41.3 and next-auth 4.24.15 and 5.0.0-beta.32.

CVSS
9.1
EG Score
9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
56
EG Risk 56/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity91% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
54th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.1 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 23, 2026

Last Modified

September 18, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github_release, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Email normalizer validates the address before Unicode normalization, allowing a homoglyph @ bypass · Advisory · nextauthjs/next-auth · GitHub

https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-7rqj-j65f-68wh
GitHub release Patch Available

[email protected]

Patch available: nextauthjs/next-auth [email protected] (pre-release)

https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/releases/tag/[email protected]
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit a63eee12a1a2 (nextauthjs/next-auth)

Patch available: nextauthjs/next-auth @auth/[email protected] (contains commit a63eee12a1a2)

https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/commit/a63eee12a1a20cb35209e44195b097868517b9a0
GitHub commit

commit 19d2feb24359 (nextauthjs/next-auth)

Fix landed in nextauthjs/next-auth commit 19d2feb24359 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/nextauthjs/next-auth/commit/19d2feb24359fa8c79418907fc68d9ec8152ca94

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-73420(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
npm@auth/core @ 0.41.3 (fixes >= 0.1.0, < 0.41.3)—ghsa
npmnext-auth @ 4.24.15 (fixes >= 4.10.3, < 4.24.15)—ghsa
npmnext-auth @ 5.0.0-beta.32 (fixes >= 5.0.0-beta.1, <= 5.0.0-beta.31)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
@auth/core—
  • 0.1.0 up to 0.41.3: fixed in 0.41.3
—
next-auth—
  • 4.10.3 up to 4.24.15: fixed in 4.24.15
  • 5.0.0-beta.1 up to 5.0.0-beta.32: fixed in 5.0.0-beta.32
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 176 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 76 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 23:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-12 23:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7rqj-j65f-68wh · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  4. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  5. 2026-11-11 23:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-11 23:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7rqj-j65f-68wh · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  7. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  8. 2026-11-10 22:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-10 22:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7rqj-j65f-68wh · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  10. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  11. 2026-11-09 22:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-09 22:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7rqj-j65f-68wh · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  13. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  14. 2026-11-08 21:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-08 21:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7rqj-j65f-68wh · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  16. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  17. 2026-11-07 21:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-07 21:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7rqj-j65f-68wh · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  19. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  20. 2026-11-06 20:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-06 20:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7rqj-j65f-68wh · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  22. 2026-11-06 17:25 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  24. 2026-11-05 20:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-11-05 20:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7rqj-j65f-68wh · GitHub severity CRITICAL
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  2. 2026-11-04 19:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-04 19:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7rqj-j65f-68wh · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  4. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  5. 2026-11-03 19:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-03 19:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7rqj-j65f-68wh · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  7. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  8. 2026-11-02 18:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-02 18:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7rqj-j65f-68wh · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  10. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  11. 2026-11-01 18:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-01 18:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7rqj-j65f-68wh · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  13. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  14. 2026-11-01 07:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7rqj-j65f-68wh · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  15. 2026-10-31 17:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  17. 2026-10-30 17:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  19. 2026-10-29 16:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  21. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  22. 2026-10-28 16:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  24. 2026-10-27 15:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  26. 2026-10-26 15:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  28. 2026-10-25 14:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  30. 2026-10-24 13:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  32. 2026-10-23 13:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  34. 2026-10-22 12:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  36. 2026-10-21 12:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  38. 2026-10-20 11:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  40. 2026-10-19 11:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  42. 2026-10-18 03:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  44. 2026-10-17 07:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  46. 2026-10-16 07:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  48. 2026-10-15 06:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  50. 2026-10-14 01:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  52. 2026-10-12 21:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  54. 2026-10-12 15:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-11 19:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-11 16:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-11 14:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  59. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  60. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  61. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  62. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  63. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  64. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  65. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  66. 2026-10-04 08:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  68. 2026-10-03 03:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  70. 2026-10-01 06:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  72. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  73. 2026-09-28 05:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  75. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-73420?
CVE-2026-73420 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 23, 2026. NextAuth.js provides authentication for Next.js. Prior to @auth/core 0.41.3 and next-auth 4.24.15 and 5.0.0-beta.32, the defaultNormalizer used by the email and magic-link sign-in flow validates an address before applying Unicode normalization. An address can contain a Unicode character such as…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-73420 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-73420 was published on July 23, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 18, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-73420 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-73420 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (54th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-73420?
CVE-2026-73420 has a CVSS base score of 9.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-73420?
A fix for CVE-2026-73420 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-73420 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-73420

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-73420?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.