CVE-2026-69192

HIGHPre-NVD 7.77.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This high-severity CVE scores 7.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (40th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-52419 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-mwp4-54f8-5fhr (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 7.7Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

ip-address is a library for parsing and manipulating IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in JavaScript. Prior to 10.3.1, Address4 accepts an octet written with a leading zero and decodes it as decimal, while the WHATWG URL host parser, inet_aton, and getaddrinfo all decode a leading zero as octal. The library and the network stack therefore disagree about which host a string names. new Address4('012.0.0.1') reports correctForm() of 12.0.0.1 and isPrivate() of false, but fetch('http://012.0.0.1/') connects to 10.0.0.1. An application that builds a network trust-boundary decision on these checks, for example a filter intended to block Server-Side Request Forgery, or SSRF, will classify an internal target as external and allow the request. The defect is in the parse gate rather than in any one classifier, so every consumer of Address4 inherits it: isPrivate(), isLoopback(), isLinkLocal(), isCGNAT(), isInSubnet(), isHostInSubnet(), and correctForm() are all computed from the mis-decoded octets. This issue is fixed in version 10.3.1.

CVSS
7.7
EG Score
7.7HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
66
EG Risk 66/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity77% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
40th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.7 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source
EG Likelihood
0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-09). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 3, 2026

Last Modified

October 23, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Aug 3, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github_release, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

ip-address: Address4 decodes leading-zero octets as decimal while resolvers decode them as octal, allowing SSRF and trust-boundary bypass · Advisory · beaugunderson/ip-address · GitHub

https://github.com/beaugunderson/ip-address/security/advisories/GHSA-mwp4-54f8-5fhr
GitHub release Patch Available

v10.3.1

Patch available: beaugunderson/ip-address v10.3.1

https://github.com/beaugunderson/ip-address/releases/tag/v10.3.1
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 56368cb3d66c (beaugunderson/ip-address)

Patch available: beaugunderson/ip-address v10.3.1 (contains commit 56368cb3d66c)

https://github.com/beaugunderson/ip-address/commit/56368cb3d66c73ba0ee9b6b834fd31b22c2fd71e

Patch Availability(30)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatdevspaces/udi-rhel9:17927086122026-10-26redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-workbench-codeserver-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9:17900139052026-09-30redhat
redhatrhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:17895542852026-09-21redhat
redhatrhmtc/openshift-migration-ui-rhel8:17895463732026-09-17redhat
redhatdevspaces/openvsx-rhel9:17891442692026-09-17redhat
redhatcryostat/cryostat-openshift-console-plugin-rhel9:4.2.0-142026-09-16redhat
redhatansible-automation-platform/bootc-automation-portal-rhel9:17889435312026-09-09redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-workbench-codeserver-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9:17878015272026-09-08redhat
redhatnodejs22-1:22.23.2-1.el10_02026-09-08redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-agent-installer-ui-rhel9:17883149632026-09-08redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-agent-installer-ui-rhel9:17883352362026-09-08redhat
redhatsatellite/iop-remediations-rhel9:17882305382026-09-03redhat
redhatsatellite/iop-remediations-rhel9:17882539402026-09-03redhat
redhatnodejs:22-9060020260901085634.rhel92026-09-02redhat
redhatrhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:17882860492026-09-02redhat
redhatrhdh/red-hat-developer-hub-backstage-plugin-scaffolder-backend-module-orchestrator:17881870322026-08-31redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-workbench-codeserver-datascience-cpu-py312-rhel9:17871213872026-08-27redhat
redhatrhacm2/console-rhel9:17873392482026-08-26redhat
redhatrhacm2/console-rhel9:17873392492026-08-26redhat
redhatrhacm2/console-rhel9:17876870622026-08-26redhat
redhatrhacm2/console-rhel9:17873351052026-08-26redhat
redhatmulticluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:17870793592026-08-25redhat
redhatmulticluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:17872590482026-08-25redhat
redhatopenshift-service-mesh/kiali-rhel9:17870764952026-08-25redhat
redhatopenshift-service-mesh/kiali-rhel9:17871656832026-08-25redhat
redhatmulticluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:17872642502026-08-25redhat
redhatopenshift-service-mesh/kiali-rhel9:17870771082026-08-25redhat
redhatopenshift-service-mesh/kiali-rhel9:17870922552026-08-25redhat
redhatmulticluster-engine/console-mce-rhel9:17866688562026-08-25redhat
npmip-address @ 10.3.1 (fixes <= 10.3.0)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-ip-address10.2.0-1 ... 8.1.0-3 (7 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-ip-address10.2.0-1 ... 8.1.0-3 (7 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-ip-address10.2.0-1 ... 8.1.0-3 (7 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-ip-address10.2.0-1, 10.2.0-2, 8.1.0-2, 8.1.0-3
  • every version up to 10.3.1-1: fixed in 10.3.1-1
—
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
ip-address—
  • every version up to 10.3.1: fixed in 10.3.1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(24)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 37× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 273 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 173 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  3. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  4. 2026-11-10 07:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-10 07:46 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-10 07:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mwp4-54f8-5fhr · GitHub severity HIGH
  7. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  8. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  9. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  10. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  11. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  12. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  13. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  14. 2026-11-03 15:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-03 15:19 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-03 15:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mwp4-54f8-5fhr · GitHub severity HIGH
  17. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  18. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  19. 2026-11-01 07:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mwp4-54f8-5fhr · GitHub severity HIGH
  20. 2026-11-01 07:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  22. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  23. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  24. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  25. 2026-10-27 21:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  2. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  3. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  4. 2026-10-25 14:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  6. 2026-10-23 21:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-10-23 21:29 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  9. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  10. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  11. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  12. 2026-10-20 08:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-10-20 08:58 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  15. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  16. 2026-10-18 03:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  18. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  19. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  20. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  21. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  22. 2026-10-13 09:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-13 09:55 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  25. 2026-10-12 15:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-11 19:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-11 16:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-11 14:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  30. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  31. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  32. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  33. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  34. 2026-10-06 23:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-06 23:45 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  37. 2026-10-05 19:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-05 19:47 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  40. 2026-10-04 23:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-04 23:44 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  43. 2026-10-04 06:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-04 06:17 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  46. 2026-10-03 02:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-03 02:13 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  49. 2026-10-02 10:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-02 10:17 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  52. 2026-10-01 13:49 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-01 02:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-01 02:32 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  56. 2026-09-29 06:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-09-29 06:36 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  59. 2026-09-28 05:30 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-09-27 18:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-09-27 18:14 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  63. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  64. 2026-09-25 04:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-09-25 04:45 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-09-24 03:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-09-24 03:32 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  69. 2026-09-23 16:15 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-09-23 02:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-09-23 02:27 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-09-22 15:10 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-22 03:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-09-22 03:54 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-69192?
CVE-2026-69192 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 3, 2026. ip-address is a library for parsing and manipulating IPv4 and IPv6 addresses in JavaScript. Prior to 10.3.1, Address4 accepts an octet written with a leading zero and decodes it as decimal, while the WHATWG URL host parser, inet_aton, and getaddrinfo all decode a leading zero as octal. The library…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-69192 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-69192 was published on August 3, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 23, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-69192 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-69192 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (40th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-69192?
CVE-2026-69192 has a CVSS base score of 7.7 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-69192?
A fix for CVE-2026-69192 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-69192 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-69192

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-69192?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.