CVE-2026-68971

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.56.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 6.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-08-12. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 6.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory

Also known asEUVD-2026-57268 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m (GitHub Security Advisories) · PYSEC-2026-3994 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

6.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 6.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Apache Airflow's asset materialization endpoint (POST /api/v2/assets/{asset_id}/materialize) and the XCom result check on wait_dag_run_until_finished authorized the target Dag without its team, unlike every other authorization site. A team-aware auth manager distinguishes a team-scoped Dag from a global one by that field -- the Keycloak auth manager, for example, checks the DAG resource instead of DAG: -- so the team-scoped permission that should gate the request was never consulted. In a deployment running multi-team mode with a team-aware auth manager, an authenticated user in one team could trigger Dag runs belonging to another team, supplying their own dag_run_id and conf, and could read another team's XCom values. Deployments using the FAB auth manager are unaffected, as it has no multi-team support. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.1 or later, which resolves the Dag's team at both sites.

CVSS v3
6.5
EG Score
6.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
29
EG Risk 29/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity65% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
26th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (6.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
6.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-02). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 12, 2026

Last Modified

November 3, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 13, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_pr.
GitHub pull request

Resolve the Dag's team when authorizing a Dag found by lookup

Fix merged in apache/airflow PR #70893 on 2026-08-04 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/70893

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-68971(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
pipapache-airflow @ 3.3.1 (fixes < 3.3.1)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-airflow1.10.0 ... 3.3.1rc2 (297 versions)
  • every version up to 3.3.1: fixed in 3.3.1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 32× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 189 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 89 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  3. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  4. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  5. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  6. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  7. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  8. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  9. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  10. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  11. 2026-11-03 07:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  12. 2026-11-03 07:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-03 07:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  14. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  15. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  16. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  17. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  18. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  19. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  20. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  21. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  22. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  23. 2026-10-25 14:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  25. 2026-10-23 20:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  2. 2026-10-22 19:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  4. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  5. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  6. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  7. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  8. 2026-10-18 03:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  10. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  11. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  12. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  13. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  14. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 24th percentile
  15. 2026-10-12 15:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-11 19:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-11 16:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-11 14:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  20. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  21. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  22. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  23. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  24. 2026-10-06 17:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  26. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  27. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  28. 2026-10-03 20:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  30. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  31. 2026-10-02 08:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-02 08:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  33. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  34. 2026-09-30 21:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-09-30 21:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  36. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  37. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  38. 2026-09-28 10:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-09-28 10:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  40. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  41. 2026-09-27 09:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-09-27 09:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  43. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  44. 2026-09-25 03:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-09-25 03:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  46. 2026-09-23 21:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-09-23 21:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  48. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  49. 2026-09-22 21:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-09-22 21:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  51. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  52. 2026-09-21 20:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-09-21 20:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  54. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  55. 2026-09-20 18:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  56. 2026-09-19 17:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-09-19 17:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  58. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 26th percentile
  59. 2026-09-18 16:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-09-18 16:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  61. 2026-09-17 16:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  62. 2026-09-16 15:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  63. 2026-09-16 15:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-09-16 15:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  65. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  66. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile
  67. 2026-09-15 13:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-09-15 13:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  69. 2026-09-14 10:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-09-14 10:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  71. 2026-09-13 10:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-09-13 10:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  73. 2026-09-12 09:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-09-12 09:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5247-m8w9-2v4m · GitHub CVSS 6.5
  75. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 25th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-68971?
CVE-2026-68971 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 12, 2026. Apache Airflow's asset materialization endpoint (POST /api/v2/assets/{asset_id}/materialize) and the XCom result check on wait_dag_run_until_finished authorized the target Dag without its team, unlike every other authorization site. A team-aware auth manager distinguishes a team-scoped Dag from a…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-68971 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-68971 was published on August 12, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 3, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-68971 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-68971 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (26th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-68971?
CVE-2026-68971 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.5 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-68971?
A fix for CVE-2026-68971 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-68971 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-68971

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-68971?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.