CVE-2026-68494

HIGHPre-NVD 8.78.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 8.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4%, top 69% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — Patch released this weekElevated
8.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 8.7Exploit: Elevated riskExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

The fix released in jackson-core 2.18.6 and 2.21.1 for CVE-2026-18401 (GHSA-72hv-8253-57qq, number length constraint bypass in the non-blocking parser) is incomplete. This record covers the remaining bypass.

The earlier fix wired validateIntegerLength() into a new _setIntLength() helper and invoked it wherever the integer portion of a number is decided: a terminator byte arrives, a '.' or 'e'/'E' is seen, or input ends inside a fully buffered value. It was not invoked on the attacker-relevant path where the parser runs out of input while still inside the MINOR_NUMBER_INTEGER_DIGITS minor state and returns NOT_AVAILABLE to the caller.

As a result, an attacker who streams JSON to a non-blocking parser in many small chunks, without ever sending a terminator byte, keeps the parser inside MINOR_NUMBER_INTEGER_DIGITS indefinitely. _textBuffer.expandCurrentSegment() grows the accumulator on every chunk while validateIntegerLength() is never called. The accumulator is bounded only by maxStringLength (20 MiB by default) rather than by maxNumberLength (1000 by default), an amplification of roughly 20,000x over the documented limit. Because Java char values occupy two bytes, a single connection can be driven to approximately 40 MiB of heap before the validator finally fires when the value completes.

The equivalent fraction-path code is correct: _finishFloatFraction() calls _setFractLength() before its NOT_AVAILABLE return. The missing call affects the integer-digit paths in _startPositiveNumber(), _startNegativeNumber() and _finishNumberIntegralPart() in NonBlockingUtf8JsonParserBase.

Impact: reactive frameworks such as Spring WebFlux/Reactor, Quarkus, Helidon and Vert.x feed inbound HTTP or gRPC bytes to the async parser as they arrive, which is precisely the chunked-feed shape required. Operators who set StreamReadConstraints.maxNumberLength expecting it to cap memory per number value do not get that guarantee; memory accumulates per concurrent connection and attacker-controlled concurrency can exhaust the JVM heap. The synchronous parsers (UTF8StreamJsonParser, ReaderBasedJsonParser) and the async parser operating on complete input are not affected.

Exploitation requires only the ability to stream data to a parsing endpoint; no privileges or user interaction are needed.

This issue affects com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core from version 2.15.0 through 2.18.7, and from 2.19.0 through 2.21.3, and tools.jackson.core:jackson-core from 3.0.0 through 3.1.3. Versions prior to 2.15.0 are not affected, because StreamReadConstraints -- which defines the maxNumberLength setting -- was first introduced in jackson-core 2.15.0, so no such constraint exists to be bypassed in earlier releases. Note that GHSA-r7wm-3cxj-wff9 states the affected 2.x range without a lower bound. The 2.22.x and 3.2.x release lines are not affected: those branches were created after the fix commit landed on 2026-05-21 and therefore contain it from their initial releases (2.22.0, tagged 2026-06-03, and 3.2.0, tagged 2026-06-08).

CVSS v3
8.7
EG Score
8.7(medium)
EG Risk
70(Attend)
EG Risk 70/100SSVC: Attend

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity87% × 45%
Exploitation40% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
Action: Remediate soon — notable exploitation risk.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
31%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 4, 2026

Last Modified

September 8, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Aug 4, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github, github_pr, github_commit.
github Patch Available🟡 PoC Available

jackson-core: Number Length Constraint Bypass in Async Parser Leads to Potential DoS Condition · GHSA-72hv-8253-57qq · GitHub Advisory Database · GitHub

https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-72hv-8253-57qq
github_commit

commit c5941e5aae7f (FasterXML/jackson-core)

Fix landed in FasterXML/jackson-core commit c5941e5aae7f — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/commit/c5941e5aae7fd5aeac55d66933cfb82b9aabeef8
github_commit

commit 4cdd529749da (FasterXML/jackson-core)

Fix landed in FasterXML/jackson-core commit 4cdd529749da — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/commit/4cdd529749da396cc7edf6d4a2aad41d47902641
github_commit

commit 050b429804dc (FasterXML/jackson-core)

Fix landed in FasterXML/jackson-core commit 050b429804dc — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/commit/050b429804dce2a7e08f0be1b0b4c3d040fdb9cd
github_pr

Apply number-length validator on streaming integer path of async parser [GHSA-r7wm-3cxj-wff9]

Fix merged in FasterXML/jackson-core PR #1611 on 2026-05-20 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/pull/1611
github Patch Available🟡 PoC Available

Async parser maxNumberLength bypass via chunked digit accumulation (incomplete fix for GHSA-72hv-8253-57qq) · Advisory · FasterXML/jackson-core · GitHub

https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/security/advisories/GHSA-r7wm-3cxj-wff9

Patch Availability(23)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(7)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 31× in last 7d / 139× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 225 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-18 17:50 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-18 17:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-18 04:42 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-18 04:42 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-09-18 04:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-17 16:15 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-17 16:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-17 01:12 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-17 01:12 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-17 01:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-16 05:16 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-16 05:16 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-16 05:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-15 16:49 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-15 16:49 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-15 16:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-15 01:41 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-15 01:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-14 07:01 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-09-14 07:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-13 18:35 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-13 18:35 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-13 18:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-09-13 06:08 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-13 06:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-12 17:38 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-12 17:38 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-09-12 17:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-12 05:12 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-12 05:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-11 16:45 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-11 16:45 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-11 16:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-11 04:18 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-11 04:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-10 15:51 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-10 15:51 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-10 15:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-10 03:09 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-10 03:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-09 08:49 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-09 08:49 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-09-09 08:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-08 20:22 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-09-08 20:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-09-07 18:36 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-07 18:36 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-07 18:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-09-06 19:28 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-06 19:28 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-09-06 19:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-09-06 06:59 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-09-06 06:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-09-05 18:33 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-05 18:33 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-09-05 18:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-09-05 04:11 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-05 04:11 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-05 04:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-09-04 10:11 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-04 10:11 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-04 10:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-09-03 20:42 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-03 20:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-09-03 08:08 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-03 08:08 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-03 08:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-09-01 20:51 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-01 20:51 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-09-01 20:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-08-31 23:02 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-31 23:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-30 22:41 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-30 22:41 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-30 22:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-08-30 10:15 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-30 10:15 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-30 10:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-08-29 21:48 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-29 21:48 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-29 21:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-08-27 23:47 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-08-27 23:47 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-27 23:47 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-68494?
CVE-2026-68494 is a high vulnerability published on August 4, 2026. The fix released in jackson-core 2.18.6 and 2.21.1 for CVE-2026-18401 (GHSA-72hv-8253-57qq, number length constraint bypass in the non-blocking parser) is incomplete. This record covers the remaining bypass. The earlier fix wired validateIntegerLength() into a new setIntLength() helper and invoked…
When was CVE-2026-68494 disclosed?
CVE-2026-68494 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 4, 2026, with the most recent update on September 8, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-68494 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-68494 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 68.9% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-68494?
CVE-2026-68494 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-68494?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-68494, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-68494

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-68494?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.