CVE-2026-68315

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-10. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — Patch released this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq()

When processing a RESET_IN_REQUEST from a peer, sctp_process_strreset_inreq() derives the stream count from the parameter length but does not check whether the resulting RESET_OUT_REQUEST would exceed SCTP_MAX_CHUNK_LEN.

The OUT request header (sctp_strreset_outreq, 16 bytes) is 8 bytes larger than the IN request header (sctp_strreset_inreq, 8 bytes). Generally, the IP payload is bounded to 65535 bytes, so the stream list cannot be large enough to trigger the overflow. However, on interfaces with MTU > 65535 (e.g., loopback with IPv6 jumbograms), a stream list that fits within the incoming IN parameter can cause a __u16 overflow in sctp_make_strreset_req() when computing the OUT request size, leading to an undersized skb allocation and a kernel BUG:

net/core/skbuff.c:207 skb_panic net/core/skbuff.c:2625 skb_put net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:1535 sctp_addto_chunk net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:3695 sctp_make_strreset_req net/sctp/stream.c:655 sctp_process_strreset_inreq

The local setsockopt path validates the generated reset request size. However, for an incoming-only reset, it accounts for the smaller IN request even though the peer must generate an OUT request with the same stream list. Such a request cannot be completed successfully by the peer.

Reject peer IN requests whose corresponding OUT request would exceed SCTP_MAX_CHUNK_LEN. Also tighten the local check so it does not send an IN request that would require an oversized OUT request from the peer.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5(medium)
EG Risk
38(Track)
EG Risk 38/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
43%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 10, 2026

Last Modified

August 19, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 14, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b255d8cd6cc68045ae9eecbac3b3c14e1f176c9b
generic

sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6f0e39d180cd7cced647381b6fa14fd83d261047
generic

sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1a10fe1aa9c01f41b389a31906a77d538637c9d9
generic

sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/18ae07691d43183d270de8be9dc8e027906015d9
generic

sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/00ae679cb21a035491fdad8d58dc6d79cc68b675

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-687.47.1.el9_82026-09-14redhat
redhatkernel-rt-0:4.18.0-553.162.1.rt7.503.el8_102026-09-10redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-553.162.1.el8_102026-09-10redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (56 versions)6.1.187-1
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u16.12.101-1~deb12u1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (32 versions)6.12.101-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (160 versions)7.1.6-1

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 35× in last 7d / 156× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 200 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-19 00:33 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-19 00:33 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-19 00:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-18 13:19 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-09-18 13:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-18 02:08 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-18 02:08 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-18 02:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-17 14:57 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-17 14:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-17 00:47 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-17 00:47 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-17 00:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-16 02:34 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-16 02:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-15 13:54 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-15 13:54 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-15 13:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-15 00:32 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-09-15 00:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-14 10:53 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-14 10:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-13 23:42 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-13 23:42 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-13 23:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-13 12:31 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-09-13 12:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-13 01:20 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-13 01:20 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-13 01:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-12 14:09 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-12 14:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-12 02:58 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-09-12 02:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-11 15:46 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-11 15:46 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-11 15:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-11 04:18 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-11 04:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-10 17:07 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-10 17:07 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-09-10 17:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-10 05:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-09 18:29 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-09 18:29 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-09-09 18:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-09-09 05:52 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-09 05:52 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-09 05:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-09-08 04:35 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-08 04:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-09-07 17:21 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-07 17:21 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-09-07 17:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-09-06 23:12 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-06 23:12 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-09-06 23:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-09-06 11:55 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-09-06 11:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-09-06 00:43 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-09-06 00:43 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-09-06 00:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-09-05 13:27 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-09-05 13:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-09-05 02:01 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-05 02:01 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-09-05 02:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-09-04 08:26 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-09-04 08:26 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-09-04 08:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-09-03 17:03 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-09-03 17:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-09-03 02:54 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-03 02:54 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-09-03 02:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-09-02 02:54 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-09-02 02:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-09-01 15:27 UTCEG score recompute
  65. 2026-09-01 15:27 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-09-01 15:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-08-31 22:13 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-31 22:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-31 06:46 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-31 06:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-08-30 19:35 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-08-30 19:35 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-30 19:35 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-68315?
CVE-2026-68315 is a high vulnerability published on August 10, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: validate stream count in sctpprocessstrreset_inreq() When processing a RESETINREQUEST from a peer, sctpprocessstrreset_inreq() derives the stream count from the parameter length but does not check whether the resulting…
When was CVE-2026-68315 disclosed?
CVE-2026-68315 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 10, 2026, with the most recent update on August 19, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-68315 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-68315 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 57.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-68315?
CVE-2026-68315 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-68315?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-68315, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-68315

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-68315?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.