CVE-2026-65901

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.16.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This medium-severity CVE scores 6.1 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (21st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-48270 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-x4vx-rjvf-j5p4 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

6.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 6.1Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

DOMPurify through 3.4.6 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability in IN_PLACE mode that trusts attacker-controlled nodeName on live non-form nodes. Attackers can supply hostile live DOM objects with real script children whose observable nodeName is clobbered to appear as allowed elements, causing scripts to execute when the sanitized tree is inserted into a live document.

CVSS v3
6.1
EG Score
6.1MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
43
EG Risk 43/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity61% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
21st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (6.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
6.1 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-29). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 23, 2026

Last Modified

October 24, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jul 23, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github.
Web page

DOMPurify 3.4.6 Cross-Site Scripting via IN_PLACE nodeName | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/dompurify-cross-site-scripting-via-in-place-nodename
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

`IN_PLACE` mode trusts attacker-controlled `nodeName` on live non-form nodes, allowing script retention and XSS via attacker-supplied DOM objects · Advisory · cure53/DOMPurify · GitHub

https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/security/advisories/GHSA-x4vx-rjvf-j5p4

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-65901(3)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatgrafana12-4-main-12.4.8-0.1.2.hum12026-08-22redhat
redhatgrafana13-1-main-13.1.3-0.1.3.hum12026-08-22redhat
npmdompurify—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-dompurify2.4.1+dfsg+~2.4.0-1 ... 3.4.5+dfsg-1 (18 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-dompurify3.1.7+dfsg+~3.0.5-2 ... 3.4.5+dfsg-1 (12 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-dompurify3.1.7+dfsg+~3.0.5-2 ... 3.4.5+dfsg-1 (8 versions)
  • every version up to 3.4.12+dfsg-1: fixed in 3.4.12+dfsg-1
—
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
dompurify—
  • every version through 3.4.6: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 239 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 139 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  4. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  5. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  6. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  7. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  8. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  9. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  10. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  11. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  12. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  13. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  14. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  15. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  16. 2026-10-29 16:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-29 16:43 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-29 16:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4vx-rjvf-j5p4 · GitHub severity LOW
  19. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  20. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  21. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  22. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  23. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
  24. 2026-10-25 14:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 20th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-24 13:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-10-24 13:33 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-24 13:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4vx-rjvf-j5p4 · GitHub severity LOW
  4. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  5. 2026-10-22 19:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-10-22 19:38 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-22 19:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4vx-rjvf-j5p4 · GitHub severity LOW
  8. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  9. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  10. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  11. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  12. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  13. 2026-10-18 03:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  15. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  16. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  17. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  18. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  19. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  20. 2026-10-12 15:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-11 19:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-11 16:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-11 14:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  25. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  26. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  27. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  28. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  29. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  30. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  31. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  32. 2026-10-04 08:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-04 08:21 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-04 08:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4vx-rjvf-j5p4 · GitHub severity LOW
  35. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  36. 2026-10-03 03:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-03 03:25 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-03 03:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4vx-rjvf-j5p4 · GitHub severity LOW
  39. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  40. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  41. 2026-10-01 06:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-01 06:17 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-01 06:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4vx-rjvf-j5p4 · GitHub severity LOW
  44. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 19th percentile
  45. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  46. 2026-09-28 05:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-09-28 05:06 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-09-28 05:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4vx-rjvf-j5p4 · GitHub severity LOW
  49. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  50. 2026-09-24 01:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-09-24 01:16 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-24 01:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4vx-rjvf-j5p4 · GitHub severity LOW
  53. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  54. 2026-09-22 22:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-09-22 22:44 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-09-22 22:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4vx-rjvf-j5p4 · GitHub severity LOW
  57. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  58. 2026-09-20 01:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-09-20 01:47 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-09-20 01:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4vx-rjvf-j5p4 · GitHub severity LOW
  61. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  62. 2026-09-18 09:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-09-18 09:55 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-18 09:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4vx-rjvf-j5p4 · GitHub severity LOW
  65. 2026-09-17 09:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-09-17 09:17 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-17 09:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4vx-rjvf-j5p4 · GitHub severity LOW
  68. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  69. 2026-09-16 06:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-09-16 06:48 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-09-16 06:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4vx-rjvf-j5p4 · GitHub severity LOW
  72. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  73. 2026-09-13 18:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-09-13 18:22 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-13 18:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4vx-rjvf-j5p4 · GitHub severity LOW

Related CVEs(same product + same vendor + same CWE)

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-65901?
CVE-2026-65901 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 23, 2026. DOMPurify through 3.4.6 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability in IN_PLACE mode that trusts attacker-controlled nodeName on live non-form nodes. Attackers can supply hostile live DOM objects with real script children whose observable nodeName is clobbered to appear as allowed elements,…
When was CVE-2026-65901 made public?
CVE-2026-65901 was made public on May 27, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on July 23, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 24, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-65901 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-65901 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (21st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-65901?
CVE-2026-65901 has a CVSS base score of 6.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-65901?
A fix for CVE-2026-65901 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-65901 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-65901

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-65901?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.

Book a Demo →Browse All CVEs