CVE-2026-63888

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-07-19. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-45661 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.8%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

scsi: target: iscsi: Fix CRC overread and double-free in iscsit_handle_text_cmd()

Two latent bugs in the Text-phase handler, both present since the original LIO integration in commit e48354ce078c ("iscsi-target: Add iSCSI fabric support for target v4.1"):

1) DataDigest CRC buffer overread (4 bytes past text_in).

text_in is kzalloc()'d at ALIGN(payload_length, 4). rx_size is then incremented by ISCSI_CRC_LEN to make room for the received DataDigest in the iovec, but the same (now-bumped) rx_size is passed as the buffer length to iscsit_crc_buf():

if (conn->conn_ops->DataDigest) { ... rx_size += ISCSI_CRC_LEN; } ... if (conn->conn_ops->DataDigest) { data_crc = iscsit_crc_buf(text_in, rx_size, 0, NULL);

iscsit_crc_buf() walks rx_size bytes of text_in with crc32c(), so when DataDigest is negotiated it reads 4 bytes past the end of the text_in allocation. KASAN reproduces this directly on the unpatched mainline tree as slab-out-of-bounds in crc32c() called from the Text PDU path. The OOB bytes feed crc32c() and are then compared against the initiator-supplied checksum, so the value does not flow back to the attacker, but the kernel does read past the buffer on every Text PDU with DataDigest=CRC32C.

Fix by passing the actual padded payload length (ALIGN(payload_length, 4)) that was used for the kzalloc().

2) Stale cmd->text_in_ptr re-free (double-free) on ERL>0 bad DataDigest drop.

On DataDigest mismatch with ErrorRecoveryLevel > 0 the handler silently drops the PDU and lets the initiator plug the CmdSN gap:

kfree(text_in); return 0;

cmd->text_in_ptr still points at the freed buffer. The next Text Request on the same ITT re-enters iscsit_setup_text_cmd(), which unconditionally does

kfree(cmd->text_in_ptr); cmd->text_in_ptr = NULL;

freeing the same pointer a second time. Session teardown via iscsit_release_cmd() has the same shape and hits the same double-free if the connection is dropped before a second Text Request arrives.

On an unmodified mainline tree the bug-1 CRC overread fires first on the initial valid Text Request and perturbs the subsequent state, so #4 was isolated by building a kernel with only the bug-1 hunk of this patch applied plus temporary printk() observability around the three relevant kfree() sites. The observability prints are not part of this patch. On that build, a three-PDU Text Request sequence after login produces two back-to-back splats:

BUG: KASAN: double-free in iscsit_setup_text_cmd+0x?? BUG: KASAN: double-free in iscsit_release_cmd+0x??

showing the same pointer freed in the ERL>0 drop path and again in iscsit_setup_text_cmd() (next Text Request on the same ITT) and once more in iscsit_release_cmd() (session teardown). On distro kernels with CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_HARDENED=y (default) the double-free becomes a remote kernel BUG(); on non-hardened kernels it corrupts the slab freelist.

Fix by clearing cmd->text_in_ptr after the kfree() in the ERL>0 drop path. With both hunks applied #4 is directly observable on the stock tree without observability printks; fixing bug-1 alone would mask #4 less, not more, so the hunks are submitted together.

Both fixes are one-liners. The Text PDU state machine is unchanged and the wire protocol is unaffected.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
59
EG Risk 59/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.8% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.8%
EPSS %ILE
56th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.8% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

October 26, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Nov 7, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

scsi: target: iscsi: Fix CRC overread and double-free in iscsit_handle_text_cmd() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f7948af0dd03de84079dcd4dc215a69fd6fbb95d
Web page

scsi: target: iscsi: Fix CRC overread and double-free in iscsit_handle_text_cmd() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ec9f19d52074a191ed1756ed4a7d39fff1a2085c
Web page

scsi: target: iscsi: Fix CRC overread and double-free in iscsit_handle_text_cmd() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d3e9b79aa794f7a23e82de4d710e7d2df610e349
Web page

scsi: target: iscsi: Fix CRC overread and double-free in iscsit_handle_text_cmd() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/badf178b76b0690851df00f4ca9cf2eb8eb0f963
Web page

scsi: target: iscsi: Fix CRC overread and double-free in iscsit_handle_text_cmd() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/89c81d1228c00fa6dd91de6c1c5aa1ef8a7875e3
Web page

scsi: target: iscsi: Fix CRC overread and double-free in iscsit_handle_text_cmd() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/778c2ab142c625a8a8afa570e0f9b7873f445d99
Web page

scsi: target: iscsi: Fix CRC overread and double-free in iscsit_handle_text_cmd() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6e22a1cdcc8277af4acc43710577157b77a02c5d
Web page

scsi: target: iscsi: Fix CRC overread and double-free in iscsit_handle_text_cmd() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5118ea225fe63b44207ba88047e4866e1ea43812

Patch Availability(31)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-5.15 (5.15.0.1068.70~20.04.1) @ focal2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-fips-5.15 (5.15.0.194.113) @ jammy2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-5.15 (5.15.0.1068.68) @ jammy2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-nolpae (5.15.0.1110.108) @ jammy2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (5.15.0.1118.128~20.04.1) @ focal2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (5.15.0.1114.120~20.04.1) @ focal2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-edge (6.8.0-1066.67~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-1016.16) @ resolute2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-26.04 (7.0.0-2016.16) @ resolute2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-6.8 (6.8.0-1035.38) @ noble2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (7.0.0-1014.14~24.04.1) @ noble2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-142.142) @ noble2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-7.0 (7.0.0-1009.9) @ resolute2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-7.0 (7.0.0-1015.15) @ resolute2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-7.0 (7.0.0-1008.8) @ resolute2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.194.204~20.04.1) @ focal2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-edge (5.15.0.1110.114~20.04.1) @ focal2026-11-11ubuntu
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-284.193.1.el9_22026-09-23redhat
redhatkernel-rt-0:5.14.0-284.193.1.rt14.478.el9_22026-09-23redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-305.208.1.el8_42026-09-22redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-477.168.1.el8_82026-09-22redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-55.105.1.el10_02026-09-21redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-570.141.1.el9_62026-09-16redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-427.150.1.el9_42026-09-16redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-372.208.1.el8_62026-08-25redhat
redhatkernel-rt-0:4.18.0-553.157.1.rt7.498.el8_102026-08-20redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-687.41.1.el9_82026-08-20redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-553.157.1.el8_102026-08-20redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.49.1.el10_22026-08-20redhat
linuxKernel @ 5.10.259 (fixes >=3.1.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (54 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.259-1: fixed in 5.10.259-1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (53 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.176-1: fixed in 6.1.176-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.94-1: fixed in 6.12.94-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (143 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.12-1: fixed in 7.0.12-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(13)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 94× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 681 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 581 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 07:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-13 07:45 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-13 07:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  5. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  6. 2026-11-12 07:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-12 07:06 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-12 07:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  10. 2026-11-11 06:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-11 06:25 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-11-11 06:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  14. 2026-11-10 05:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-10 05:44 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-10 05:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  18. 2026-11-09 05:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-09 05:05 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-09 05:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  22. 2026-11-08 04:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-08 04:26 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-08 04:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-07 03:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-07 03:42 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-07 03:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  5. 2026-11-06 14:55 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-11-06 03:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-06 03:03 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-06 03:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  10. 2026-11-05 02:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-05 02:24 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-11-05 02:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  14. 2026-11-04 01:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-04 01:45 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-04 01:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  18. 2026-11-03 01:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-03 01:06 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-03 01:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  22. 2026-11-02 00:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-02 00:23 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-02 00:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-10-31 23:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-31 23:43 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-31 23:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  28. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  29. 2026-10-30 23:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-30 23:04 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-30 23:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  32. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  33. 2026-10-29 22:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-29 22:25 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-29 22:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  36. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  37. 2026-10-28 21:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-28 21:47 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-28 21:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  40. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  41. 2026-10-27 21:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-27 21:06 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-27 21:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  44. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  45. 2026-10-26 20:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-26 20:27 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-26 20:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  48. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  49. 2026-10-26 01:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-26 01:26 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-26 01:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  52. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  53. 2026-10-25 14:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-25 00:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-25 00:47 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-25 00:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  57. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  58. 2026-10-24 00:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-24 00:08 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-24 00:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  61. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  62. 2026-10-22 23:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-22 23:29 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-22 23:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  65. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  66. 2026-10-21 22:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-21 22:50 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-21 22:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  69. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  70. 2026-10-20 22:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-10-20 22:11 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-10-20 22:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-ww53-m8wh-v825 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  73. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  74. 2026-10-19 21:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-19 21:30 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63888?
CVE-2026-63888 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: target: iscsi: Fix CRC overread and double-free in iscsit_handle_text_cmd() Two latent bugs in the Text-phase handler, both present since the original LIO integration in commit e48354ce078c ("iscsi-target: Add iSCSI fabric…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-63888 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-63888 was published on July 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 26, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-63888 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63888 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.8% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (56th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63888?
CVE-2026-63888 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63888?
A fix for CVE-2026-63888 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-63888 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63888

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63888?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.