CVE-2026-63219

CRITICALPre-NVD 8.69.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than the CVSS score beside it.

Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on ENISA's EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue (Source: ENISA EUVD), indicating that ENISA records real-world exploitation of it. It is not on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.6 retained for reference (NVD's own analysis pending). The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.6 HIGH under a secondary CVSS source. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: ENISA EU KEV (actively exploited, as ENISA records it; Source: ENISA EUVD)
Sources: EPSS, ENISA's EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-70647 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch soonRemediate sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Exploited in the wild, as ENISA's EU KEV records it (Source: ENISA EUVD); CISA has not listed it
CISA-KEV: Not listedENISA EU KEV: Listed (Source: ENISA EUVD)EPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 8.6Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. Prior to versions 4.4.12 and 4.2.17, the API endpoint for creating a new formatter via file upload is unprotected and allows the upload of external uncontrolled files. An unauthenticated attacker can upload arbitrary .xsl or .zip formatter files to the server. An unauthenticated attacker can write arbitrary files into the GeoNetwork formatter directory. On its own this constitutes unauthorized write access to server storage. The issue is patched in GeoNetwork versions 4.4.12 and 4.2.17.

CVSS v3
8.6
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
94
EG Risk 94/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity86% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.6 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for an ENISA EU KEV listing (CISA's catalog does not list this CVE): EchelonGraph's rule. Source: ENISA EUVD.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation active (ENISA EU KEV listing; Source: ENISA EUVD) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). From CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment): automatable and technical impact; the others come from the sources named beside them. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
40th
KEV
Not in CISA'sENISA's EU KEV lists it (below). Source: ENISA EUVD

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the ENISA EU KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.6 HIGH. Source: ENISA EUVD.

EG Severity
8.6 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
ENISA EU KEV (Source: ENISA EUVD)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Attend at medium mission impactAttend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

ENISA EU KEV: listed September 2, 2026, reported by CNW; not on CISA's KEV catalog.

Source: ENISA EUVD (EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue), reproduced with acknowledgement. How a listing moves the EG score

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high.

Exploitation active (ENISA EU KEV listing; Source: ENISA EUVD) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). From CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment): automatable and technical impact; the others come from the sources named beside them. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 3, 2026

Last Modified

September 9, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Sep 3, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_pr, github.
Web page

GeoNetwork Fixes Unauthenticated RCE Chain Affecting Government Geoportal Backends

https://thehackernews.com/2026/09/geonetwork-fixes-unauthenticated-rce.html
GitHub pull request Patch Available

Ensure consistent access control to formatter admin API

Patch available: geonetwork/core-geonetwork 4.4.12 (PR #9346 merged 2026-06-17)

https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/pull/9346
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Unauthenticated file upload via missing authorization on formatter upload endpoint · Advisory · geonetwork/core-geonetwork · GitHub

https://github.com/geonetwork/core-geonetwork/security/advisories/GHSA-mh22-prqr-vf42

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 32× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 127 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 27 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 06:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  4. 2026-11-12 08:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  6. 2026-11-11 10:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  8. 2026-11-10 11:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  10. 2026-11-09 13:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  12. 2026-11-08 14:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  14. 2026-11-06 18:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  16. 2026-11-06 14:55 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-11-05 19:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  19. 2026-11-04 21:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  21. 2026-11-03 22:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  23. 2026-11-03 00:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  25. 2026-11-02 02:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 03:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  4. 2026-10-31 05:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  6. 2026-10-30 06:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  8. 2026-10-29 08:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  10. 2026-10-28 09:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  12. 2026-10-27 10:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  14. 2026-10-26 12:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  16. 2026-10-25 13:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored▲ 0.40
  17. 2026-10-25 13:46 UTCENISA EU KEV listingEUVD-2026-70647 · listed September 2, 2026 · reported by CNW · Source: ENISA EUVD
  18. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  19. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  20. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  21. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  22. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  23. 2026-10-20 09:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  25. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  26. 2026-10-18 03:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  28. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  29. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  30. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  31. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  32. 2026-10-13 12:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  34. 2026-10-12 15:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-11 19:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-11 16:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-11 14:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  39. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  40. 2026-10-09 23:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  42. 2026-10-09 01:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  44. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  45. 2026-10-06 19:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  47. 2026-10-06 06:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  49. 2026-10-05 03:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  51. 2026-10-04 01:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  53. 2026-10-02 22:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  55. 2026-10-01 20:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  57. 2026-09-30 19:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  59. 2026-09-30 02:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-09-29 11:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-09-28 21:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  63. 2026-09-27 19:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-09-26 17:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  66. 2026-09-26 03:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-09-25 00:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-09-23 22:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  70. 2026-09-22 20:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-09-22 07:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-09-21 05:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  74. 2026-09-20 04:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-09-19 02:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63219?
CVE-2026-63219 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 3, 2026. GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. Prior to versions 4.4.12 and 4.2.17, the API endpoint for creating a new formatter via file upload is unprotected and allows the upload of external uncontrolled files. An unauthenticated attacker can upload arbitrary .xsl…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-63219 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-63219 was published on September 3, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 9, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-63219 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63219 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. ENISA's EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue lists CVE-2026-63219 (added September 2, 2026, reported by CNW): ENISA records its exploitation in the wild. Source: ENISA EUVD (EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue), reproduced with acknowledgement. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (40th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63219?
CVE-2026-63219 has a CVSS base score of 8.6 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending). EchelonGraph synthesises a secondary CVSS source + ENISA's EU KEV (Source: ENISA EUVD) + FIRST EPSS into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63219?
A fix for CVE-2026-63219 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-63219

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63219?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.