libheif is a HEIF and AVIF file format decoder and encoder. In 1.23.0 and earlier, a crafted HEIF or AVIF file containing a clean aperture box can reduce an image dimension to zero and crash or corrupt tiling results when heif_image_handle_get_image_tiling(handle, 1, &tiling) is called. ImageItem::get_heif_image_tiling() returns already transformed dimensions, and process_image_transformations_on_tiling() applies the clean aperture transformation again. The second application passes zero to Box_clap::left_rounded(0), where image_width minus one underflows and constructs Fraction(0xFFFFFFFF, 2). Debug builds reach an assertion and abort, while release builds can return a corrupt crop and zero-width tiling result. The affected implementation spans libheif/image-items/image_item.cc, libheif/context.cc, and libheif/box.cc. This issue is fixed in version 1.23.1.
CVE-2026-62289
This medium-severity CVE scores 4.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 77% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 4.3
- EG Score
- 4.3(medium)
- EG Risk
- 19(Track)EG Risk 19/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity43% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 23%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 18, 2026
Last Modified
September 9, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Aug 18, 2026Integer underflow in Fraction constructor via double clap transform application (CWE-190/617) · Advisory · strukturag/libheif · GitHub
Affected: v1.23.0 (latest). Verified against 10+ related Fraction/clap commits including
https://github.com/strukturag/libheif/security/advisories/GHSA-jc8f-p23p-5hjgv1.23.1
Patch available: strukturag/libheif v1.23.1
https://github.com/strukturag/libheif/releases/tag/v1.23.1commit f01870c1d732 (strukturag/libheif)
Patch available: strukturag/libheif v1.23.1 (contains commit f01870c1d732)
https://github.com/strukturag/libheif/commit/f01870c1d7323a3003796d58eba7fff502be994cPatch Availability(2)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | libheif1 (1.1.0-2ubuntu0.1~esm4) @ bionic | 2026-09-19 | ubuntu |
| ubuntu | libheif1 (1.21.2-3ubuntu0.4) @ resolute | 2026-09-19 | ubuntu |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| libheif | 1.15.1-1 ... 1.23.2-1 (34 versions) | — | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| libheif | 1.19.8-1 | 1.19.8-1+deb13u1 | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| libheif | 1.19.8-1 ... 1.21.2-4 (8 versions) | 1.23.1-1 | — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(2)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 73× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-19 10:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 10:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 11:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 11:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 13:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 14:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 14:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 14:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 16:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 17:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 17:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 18:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 18:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 20:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 20:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 21:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 21:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 22:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 02:46 UTCEG score recompute
Show 57 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-09 02:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 15:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 16:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 16:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-05 17:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 19:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 19:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-02 21:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-02 21:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 22:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 22:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 00:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-31 01:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-31 01:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 03:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 03:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-29 04:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 05:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 06:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 06:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 07:43 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 07:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 09:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 09:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 10:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 10:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 11:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 11:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-22 13:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-22 13:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 14:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 14:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 16:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 17:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 17:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 22:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 21:23 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 21:23 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-62289?
When was CVE-2026-62289 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-62289 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-62289?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-62289?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-62289
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-62289?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.