SOCFortress CoPilot focuses on providing a single pane of glass for all your security operations needs. In affected deployments, the unauthenticated /scoutsuite-report StaticFiles mount in backend/copilot.py exposes the scoutsuite-report directory even though normal /api routes require JWT authentication. Generated HTML reports and scoutsuite-results/scoutsuite_results_.js files disclose AWS, Azure and GCP IAM principals, resource inventories, misconfigurations and findings. Report names derive from caller-selected names with predictable defaults. During an admin- or analyst-initiated GCP scan, backend/app/integrations/scoutsuite/routes/scoutsuite.py saves the uploaded Google service-account JSON key into that same web-served directory. In backend/app/integrations/scoutsuite/services/scoutsuite.py, generate_gcp_report_background removes the key only after the scan finishes. Any anonymous client that can reach the host and request the file path can therefore retrieve the private key during the scan and use the service account's cloud permissions, as well as read retained cloud-security reports. Credential isolation is released in version 0.1.77; a release fully remediating the report-disclosure component has not been established.
CVE-2026-61730
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (31st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-113995 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.3
- EG Score
- 9.3CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 57EG Risk 57/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity93% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation0.4% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.4%
- EPSS %ILE
- 31st
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (9.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 9.3 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
- EG Likelihood
- 0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-11). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 30, 2026
Last Modified
October 30, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Oct 30, 2026GitHub - socfortress/CoPilot at v0.1.77 · GitHub
https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/tree/v0.1.77commit bfa630b65d55 (socfortress/CoPilot)
Patch available: socfortress/CoPilot v0.1.77 (contains commit bfa630b65d55)
https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/commit/bfa630b65d554670c7462a32ce6fd4e3cbd0254cfix(security): keep uploaded GCP credential out of web-served dir (GHSA-pm2w-mmc3-h8hc, part 1)
Patch available: socfortress/CoPilot v0.1.77 (PR #940 merged 2026-06-23)
https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/pull/940Unauthenticated Exposure of ScoutSuite Reports and Uploaded GCP Service-Account Key via Static Mount · Advisory · socfortress/CoPilot · GitHub
https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/security/advisories/GHSA-pm2w-mmc3-h8hcWeakness Classification(4)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 16× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.
- 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-11-12 07:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-11-11 08:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-11-10 10:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-11-09 11:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
- 2026-11-08 12:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-11-07 13:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-11-06 14:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-06 14:25 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-11-04 17:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-11-03 18:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-11-03 12:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-11-02 13:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-11-01 15:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 5 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
- 2026-10-30 16:02 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-113995 · Source: ENISA EUVD
- 2026-10-30 15:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-30 14:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 9.3 CRITICAL
- 2026-10-30 14:34 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-306 · CWE-200 · CWE-552
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-61730?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-61730 published?
Is CVE-2026-61730 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-61730?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-61730?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-61730
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-61730?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.