CVE-2026-60089

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.5 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (10th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-42895 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-qjw5-xwrp-xwpq (GitHub Security Advisories) · GHSA-rrqj-82cc-g6h4 (GitHub Security Advisories) · PYSEC-2026-4273 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

PraisonAI (pip package praisonaiagents) before 1.6.78 automatically loads defaults from a project-local .praisonai/config.toml when constructing an Agent, and does not validate the defaults.output.output_file path. A repository-controlled config file can set output_file to an absolute or '..' traversal path; when the developer subsequently calls agent.start() without explicitly passing an output parameter, PraisonAI writes the agent response to that path (creating parent directories as needed), allowing an untrusted checked-out project to overwrite files outside the project root with the privileges of the user running PraisonAI.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
41
EG Risk 41/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
10th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 10, 2026

Last Modified

October 24, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jul 10, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Project config can auto-save agent output outside the project root · Advisory · MervinPraison/PraisonAI · GitHub

https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-qjw5-xwrp-xwpq
Web page

PraisonAI before 1.6.78 Path Traversal via config.toml | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/praisonai-before-path-traversal-via-config-toml
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 3aa9cbc2bd49 (MervinPraison/PraisonAI)

Patch available: MervinPraison/PraisonAI v4.6.111 (contains commit 3aa9cbc2bd49)

https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/commit/3aa9cbc2bd49c23a32be0a89a5e620d13d843eab

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-60089(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
pippraisonaiagents @ 1.6.78 (fixes <= 1.6.77)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
praisonaiagents0.0.1 ... 1.6.9 (604 versions)
  • every version up to 1.6.78: fixed in 1.6.78
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 31× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 221 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 121 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  3. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  4. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  5. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  6. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  7. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  8. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  9. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  10. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  11. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  12. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  13. 2026-11-01 07:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qjw5-xwrp-xwpq · GitHub severity MODERATE
  14. 2026-11-01 07:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  16. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  17. 2026-10-29 16:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  19. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  20. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  21. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  22. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  23. 2026-10-25 14:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-24 23:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  2. 2026-10-22 20:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  4. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  5. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  6. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  7. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  8. 2026-10-18 03:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  10. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  11. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  12. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  13. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  14. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  15. 2026-10-12 15:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-11 19:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-11 16:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-11 14:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  20. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  21. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  22. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  23. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  24. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  25. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  26. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  27. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  28. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  29. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  30. 2026-10-01 15:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-01 15:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rrqj-82cc-g6h4 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  32. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  33. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  34. 2026-09-28 09:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-09-28 09:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rrqj-82cc-g6h4 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  36. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  37. 2026-09-24 11:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-09-24 11:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rrqj-82cc-g6h4 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  39. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  40. 2026-09-23 05:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-09-23 05:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rrqj-82cc-g6h4 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  42. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  43. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  44. 2026-09-18 05:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-09-18 05:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rrqj-82cc-g6h4 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  46. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  47. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  48. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  49. 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  50. 2026-09-14 09:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-09-14 09:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rrqj-82cc-g6h4 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  52. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  53. 2026-09-13 08:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-09-13 08:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rrqj-82cc-g6h4 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  55. 2026-09-12 03:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-09-12 03:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rrqj-82cc-g6h4 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  57. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  58. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  59. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  60. 2026-09-08 02:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-09-08 02:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rrqj-82cc-g6h4 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  62. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  63. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  64. 2026-09-05 21:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-09-05 21:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rrqj-82cc-g6h4 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  66. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  67. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  68. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  69. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  70. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  71. 2026-08-30 06:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-08-30 06:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rrqj-82cc-g6h4 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  73. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  74. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  75. 2026-08-27 21:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-60089?
CVE-2026-60089 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 10, 2026. PraisonAI (pip package praisonaiagents) before 1.6.78 automatically loads defaults from a project-local .praisonai/config.toml when constructing an Agent, and does not validate the defaults.output.output_file path. A repository-controlled config file can set output_file to an absolute or '..'…
When was CVE-2026-60089 made public?
CVE-2026-60089 was made public on June 25, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on July 10, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 24, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-60089 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-60089 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (10th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-60089?
CVE-2026-60089 has a CVSS base score of 5.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-60089?
A fix for CVE-2026-60089 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-60089 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-60089

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-60089?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.