CVE-2026-59694

HIGHPre-NVD 8.38.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 8.3 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 78% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: cna:eef, epss
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated
8.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 8.3Exploit: Elevated riskExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input in ZenHive mpp allows an unauthenticated remote client to inflate the fee-payer's gas cost per payment by a large multiplier, degrading the sponsor's operating margin.

When the mpp Elixir library is configured as fee payer (fee_payer: true), MPP.Tempo.Transaction.cosign_fee_payer/3 re-signs the client-supplied base fields of the 0x76 AASigned envelope verbatim, including the EIP-2930 access list, without validating its length or contents. EIP-2930 access list entries incur intrinsic gas (~2,400 gas per address, plus 1,900 gas per storage key) charged before any opcode executes, regardless of whether the listed addresses are ever touched. A malicious client submits a valid transferWithMemo call alongside a large number of fabricated access-list entries. The server co-signs and broadcasts the transaction. The intended transfer executes normally, but the fee-payer wallet pays a large multiple of the expected gas cost with no corresponding on-chain work.

At the maintainer's default of 137 access-list entries (fitting within Bandit's 10,000-byte per-header-field limit) and 100 Gwei max_fee_per_gas, per-payment gas cost rises from ~51,287 to ~380,087 gas, a 7.4x multiplier. Sustained abuse destroys the sponsor's operating margin on low-cost payments and, over time, drains the fee-payer wallet.

This issue affects mpp: from 0.2.0 before 0.6.0.

CVSS v3
8.3
EG Score
8.3(medium)
EG Risk
53(Track)
EG Risk 53/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity83% × 45%
Exploitation40% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
22%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 17, 2026

Last Modified

July 18, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Jul 17, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
generic

OSV - Open Source Vulnerabilities

https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-59694
github Patch Available🟡 PoC Available

Gas Draining with access list · Advisory · ZenHive/mpp · GitHub

https://github.com/ZenHive/mpp/security/advisories/GHSA-qpxh-ff8m-c62v
github_commit

commit 5d6338e23340 (ZenHive/mpp)

Fix landed in ZenHive/mpp commit 5d6338e23340 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/ZenHive/mpp/commit/5d6338e2334084c5f2a78cfcca474830733ed7e8
generic

Unbounded access list in mpp Tempo fee-payer inflates gas cost per payment | Erlang Ecosystem Foundation CNA

https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-59694.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-59694(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Hex(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
mpp0.2.0, 0.3.0, 0.3.1, 0.3.2, 0.4.00.6.0

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 39× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-27 14:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-27 10:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-07-26 22:54 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-07-26 22:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-26 11:20 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-07-26 11:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-23 03:21 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-18 04:52 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-07-18 04:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-07-18 04:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 14 more
  1. 2026-07-18 03:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-07-18 02:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-07-18 01:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-07-18 01:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-07-18 01:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-07-18 00:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-07-17 22:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-07-17 14:01 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-07-17 14:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-07-17 12:35 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-07-17 12:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-07-17 12:00 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-07-17 10:19 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-07-17 10:19 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-59694?
CVE-2026-59694 is a high vulnerability published on July 17, 2026. Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input in ZenHive mpp allows an unauthenticated remote client to inflate the fee-payer's gas cost per payment by a large multiplier, degrading the sponsor's operating margin. When the mpp Elixir library is configured as fee payer (feepayer: true),…
When was CVE-2026-59694 disclosed?
CVE-2026-59694 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 17, 2026, with the most recent update on July 18, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-59694 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-59694 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 77.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-59694?
CVE-2026-59694 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 8.3 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-59694?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-59694, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-59694

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-59694?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.