CVE-2026-59140

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.19.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-07-21. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 9.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory

Also known asEUVD-2026-46353 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

Upgrade to Data::SortedSet::Shared 0.03 or later, which bounds every node index against the node pool before dereferencing it (from the CVE record's solution, CPAN Security Group) — apply it.

Data::SortedSet::Shared versions before 0.03 for Perl allow an out-of-bounds read via unvalidated node indices in the rank and min/max query paths.

The attach-time validator ss_validate_header bounds only the root index against the node pool (node_capacity). The order-statistics and min/max queries then follow children[], leftmost and rightmost node indices read raw from the mmap'd segment without bounding them against node_capacity. A full structural check (ss_validate_tree) exists but runs only via an explicit validate method, not on attach.

A local peer that can write the backing file can leave the header valid while poisoning the tree links, so the next rank, min or max query dereferences an out-of-bounds node index, reading adjacent memory or crashing the process.

CVSS v3
9.1
EG Score
9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
56
EG Risk 56/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity91% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.5% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: Upgrade to Data::SortedSet::Shared 0.03 or later, which bounds every node index against the node pool before dereferencing it (from the CVE record's solution, CPAN Security Group). Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
45th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.1 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

Upgrade to Data::SortedSet::Shared 0.03 or later, which bounds every node index against the node pool before dereferencing it (from the CVE record's solution, CPAN Security Group). Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 21, 2026

Last Modified

October 24, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026
Fix named in the CVE record's solution (CPAN Security Group).

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-59140(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 59× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 474 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 374 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 10:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 10:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  3. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  4. 2026-11-12 09:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 09:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  6. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  7. 2026-11-11 08:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-11 08:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  9. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  10. 2026-11-10 08:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-10 08:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  12. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  13. 2026-11-09 07:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-09 07:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  15. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  16. 2026-11-08 07:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-08 07:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  18. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  19. 2026-11-07 06:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-07 06:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  21. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  22. 2026-11-06 06:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-06 06:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  24. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  25. 2026-11-05 05:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 05:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  2. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  3. 2026-11-04 05:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-04 05:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  5. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  6. 2026-11-03 04:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-03 04:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  8. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  9. 2026-11-02 03:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-02 03:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  11. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  12. 2026-11-01 03:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-01 03:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  14. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  15. 2026-10-31 02:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-31 02:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  17. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  18. 2026-10-30 01:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-30 01:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  20. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  21. 2026-10-29 01:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-29 01:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  23. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  24. 2026-10-28 00:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-28 00:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  26. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  27. 2026-10-27 00:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-27 00:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  29. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  30. 2026-10-25 19:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-25 19:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  32. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 45th percentile
  33. 2026-10-25 14:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-24 19:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-24 19:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  36. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  37. 2026-10-23 23:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-23 23:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  39. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  40. 2026-10-22 22:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-22 22:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  42. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  43. 2026-10-21 22:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-21 22:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  45. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  46. 2026-10-20 21:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-20 21:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  48. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  49. 2026-10-19 21:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-19 21:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  51. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  52. 2026-10-18 19:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-18 19:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  54. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  55. 2026-10-18 03:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-17 19:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-17 19:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  58. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  59. 2026-10-16 18:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-16 18:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  61. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  62. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  63. 2026-10-15 15:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-15 15:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  65. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  66. 2026-10-14 09:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-14 09:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  68. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  69. 2026-10-13 07:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-13 07:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  71. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  72. 2026-10-12 15:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-12 06:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6qfv-wgp3-38c4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  74. 2026-10-11 19:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-11 16:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-59140?
CVE-2026-59140 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 21, 2026. Data::SortedSet::Shared versions before 0.03 for Perl allow an out-of-bounds read via unvalidated node indices in the rank and min/max query paths. The attach-time validator ss_validate_header bounds only the root index against the node pool (node_capacity). The order-statistics and min/max queries…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-59140 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-59140 was published on July 21, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 24, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-59140 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-59140 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (45th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-59140?
CVE-2026-59140 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.1 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-59140?
The CVE record's solution for CVE-2026-59140, written by its CNA CPAN Security Group, names the fix: "Upgrade to Data::SortedSet::Shared 0.03 or later, which bounds every node index against the node pool before dereferencing it." The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-59140 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-59140

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-59140?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.