CVE-2026-58445

LOWPre-NVD 2.72.7
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This low-severity CVE scores 2.7 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: cna:github_m
2.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: CVSS: 2.7Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Gitea: Cross-repository label-ID enumeration oracle via unscoped DeleteIssueLabel API

Summary

The API endpoint DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/labels/{id} loads the label by ID with a **global, unscoped** lookup and never verifies the label belongs to the URL's repository (or its owning organization). Because the response status differs by whether the label ID exists anywhere on the instance (204) versus not (422), an authenticated user can use the endpoint as a cross-repository label-ID existence / enumeration oracle, including for labels in repositories and organizations they cannot access.

Severity

  • The leaked information is minimal (existence/count of label IDs instance-wide); **no label name, color, or owning
repository is disclosed, and no cross-repository write occurs.**

Affected / patched versions

  • Affected: through 1.26.3 (latest at time of report).
  • Patched: none yet.

Details

DeleteIssueLabel resolves the label with a global loader and never checks its scope:

// routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go  (DeleteIssueLabel)
label, err := issues_model.GetLabelByID(ctx, ctx.PathParamInt64("id"))   // global, unscoped

GetLabelByID (models/issues/label.go) is e.ID(labelID).Get(l) with no repo_id / org_id filter. The handler never verifies label.RepoID == ctx.Repo.Repository.ID (nor the org-label equivalent), and the downstream issue_service.RemoveLabel (services/issue/label.go) only re-checks the doer's write permission on the **issue's own** repository — never that the label belongs to it.

Every sibling label handler is correctly scoped — GetLabel / EditLabel / DeleteLabel (repo and org) use GetLabelInRepoByID / GetLabelInOrgByID and return 404 for a foreign ID. DeleteIssueLabel is the only outlier.

Why it is only an oracle: deleteIssueLabel (models/issues/issue_label.go) deletes the issue_label row keyed by (issue.ID, label.ID). For a foreign label, no such row exists → the function returns early before any mutation or comment creation. So there is no cross-repo write and no leak of the label's name. But the HTTP status differs:

  • label ID exists anywhere on the instance (incl. private repos/orgs) → 204 No Content
  • label ID does not exist → 422 (ErrLabelNotExist)

Label IDs are sequential auto-increment, so this enumerates the instance-wide label population and probes existence of specific IDs across tenant boundaries.

Proof of Concept

Verified end-to-end on a build of the v1.26.3 tag.

  • alice (private repo alice/secret) creates a label → internal id 1.
  • Attacker bob (separate user; public repo bob/pub with issue #1; no access to alice/secret) holds a token
with write:issue on his own repo.

bob DELETE /api/v1/repos/bob/pub/issues/1/labels/1          -> HTTP 204   (alice's PRIVATE label id exists)
bob DELETE /api/v1/repos/bob/pub/issues/1/labels/99999999   -> HTTP 422   (no such label)

Differing only by the label ID: 204 vs 422 distinguishes "label ID exists" from "does not exist." bob has zero rights to alice/secret but can still learn label id 1 exists. (Alice's label is untouched — no write.)

Reproduction steps:

  • Create two users alice, bob. As alice, create a private repo and a label on it (note the label id from
the API response).
  • As bob, create any repo with an issue, and a token with write:issue.
  • curl -u bob:$T -X DELETE https:///api/v1/repos/bob/pub/issues/1/labels/204.
  • curl -u bob:$T -X DELETE https:///api/v1/repos/bob/pub/issues/1/labels/99999999422.
  • The differing status across an ID bob cannot otherwise see is the oracle.

Impact

Cross-tenant authorization-key bypass producing a label-ID existence/enumeration oracle: an authenticated user can determine whether arbitrary label IDs (including in private repositories and organizations they cannot access) exist, and enumerate the instance-wide label population.

Remediation

Scope the loader like every sibling handler, returning 404 for a label that is not in the URL repository (or its owning organization), so the status no longer distinguishes existence:

// routers/api/v1/repo/issue_label.go — in DeleteIssueLabel, after loading the label
if label.RepoID != ctx.Repo.Repository.ID && label.OrgID != ctx.Repo.Repository.OwnerID {
    ctx.APIErrorNotFound()
    return
}

(Equivalently, resolve via GetLabelInRepoByID and, for org repositories, also accept the repo owner's org labels — mirroring the scoping in GetLabel/EditLabel/DeleteLabel.)

CVSS v3
2.7
EG Score
2.7(low)
EG Risk
17(Track)
EG Risk 17/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity27% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
EPSS %ILE
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 21, 2026

Last Modified

July 21, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-58445(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
code.gitea.io/gitea1.27.0

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 2× in last 7d / 2× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-23 03:21 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-21 21:20 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-58445?
CVE-2026-58445 is a low vulnerability published on July 21, 2026. Gitea: Cross-repository label-ID enumeration oracle via unscoped DeleteIssueLabel API Summary The API endpoint DELETE /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/labels/{id} loads the label by ID with a global, unscoped lookup and never verifies the label belongs to the URL's repository (or its owning…
When was CVE-2026-58445 disclosed?
CVE-2026-58445 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 21, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-58445?
CVE-2026-58445 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 2.7 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-58445?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-58445, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-58445

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-58445?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.