A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC IoT2050 Advanced (6ES7647-0BA00-1YA2) (All versions < V4.3.4-1 running Industrial OS with Node-RED installed), SIMATIC IoT2050 Advanced (6ES7647-0BA00-1YA2) (All versions running Example Image versions with Node-RED installed), SIMATIC IoT2050 Basic (6ES7647-0BA00-0YA2) (All versions < V4.3.4-1 running Industrial OS with Node-RED installed), SIMATIC IoT2050 Basic (6ES7647-0BA00-0YA2) (All versions running Example Image versions with Node-RED installed), SIMATIC IoT2050 M.2 (6ES7647-0BB00-1YA2) (All versions < V4.3.4-1 running Industrial OS with Node-RED installed), SIMATIC IoT2050 M.2 (6ES7647-0BB00-1YA2) (All versions running Example Image versions with Node-RED installed), SIMATIC IoT2050 SM (6ES7647-0CA00-1AA2) (All versions < V4.3.4-1 running Industrial OS with Node-RED installed), SIMATIC IoT2050 SM (6ES7647-0CA00-1AA2) (All versions running Example Image versions with Node-RED installed). Affected devices do not enforce authentication on the Node-RED HTTP interface, allowing unauthenticated access to programming nodes that are capable of executing system commands on the server. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to create malicious flows through the HTTP interface in order to execute arbitrary code on the underlying server with maximum privileges.
CVE-2026-58115
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
Score 10.0 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-08-11. A secondary CVSS source baseline 10.0; sources differ by 0.0.
Also known asEUVD-2026-56119 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
- Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
The CVE record's CNA (Siemens) lists Siemens SIMATIC IoT2050 Advanced (6ES7647-0BA00-1YA2) versions before V4.3.4-1; Siemens SIMATIC IoT2050 Basic (6ES7647-0BA00-0YA2) versions before V4.3.4-1; Siemens SIMATIC IoT2050 M.2 (6ES7647-0BB00-1YA2) versions before V4.3.4-1 as affected, and 1 more product. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.
- CVSS
- 10.0
- EG Score
- 10.0CRITICALmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 76EG Risk 76/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity100% × 45%Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.Exploitation40% × 40%EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.Automatability100% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.9%
- EPSS %ILE
- 59th
- KEV
- Not listed
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 10.0 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.
No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
August 11, 2026
Last Modified
November 10, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Nov 6, 2026Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-58115(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 67× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 459 rows on record for this CVE.
A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 359 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.
- 2026-11-13 01:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-13 01:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-11-12 02:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-12 02:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-11-11 02:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-11 02:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-11-10 12:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-09 16:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-09 16:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-11-09 16:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-09 08:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-09 08:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-11-08 08:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-08 08:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-11-07 09:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-07 09:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-11-06 09:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-06 09:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-11-06 09:32 UTCENISA EU KEV listing withdrawnEUVD-2026-56119 · listed November 3, 2026 · reported by CNW · Source: ENISA EUVD
- 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-11-05 15:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-05 15:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-05 15:32 UTCENISA EU KEV listingEUVD-2026-56119 · listed November 3, 2026 · reported by CNW · Source: ENISA EUVD
- 2026-11-04 18:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-04 18:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-04 17:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-04 17:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-11-04 10:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-04 10:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
- 2026-11-03 10:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-03 10:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-11-02 10:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-02 10:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-11-01 11:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-11-01 11:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-31 11:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-31 11:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-30 11:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-30 11:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-29 12:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-29 12:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-28 12:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-28 12:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-27 12:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-26 23:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-26 23:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-25 20:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-25 20:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-25 14:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-24 21:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-24 21:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 61st percentile
- 2026-10-23 21:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-23 19:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-23 19:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-23 07:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-23 07:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-22 07:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-22 07:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-21 07:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-21 07:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-20 08:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-20 08:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-19 08:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-19 08:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-18 08:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-18 03:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-17 06:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-17 06:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-16 07:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-16 07:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
- 2026-10-15 06:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
- 2026-10-15 06:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mmh6-f99q-64fh · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 10.0
- 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 60th percentile
Publicly available exploits
(1 reference)Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 GitHub PoC). No fix is confirmed yet, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly until one is published.
- GitHub PoCfoxcornlab/node-red-scannerPublished Nov 3, 2026
Detection-only local triage scanner for CVE-2026-58115 (CVSS 10.0) in Siemens SIMATIC IoT2050 Node-RED: grades Industrial OS versions against V4.3.4.1 and settings.js for adminAuth. No payloads, no remote probing.
Open source ↗
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-58115?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-58115 published?
Is CVE-2026-58115 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-58115?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-58115?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-58115
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-58115?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.