CVE-2026-57580

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.49.4
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.4 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (48th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from the CNA's CVSS
Sources: the CNA's CVSS, EPSS

Also known asEUVD-2026-61062 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 9.4Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

The CVE record names the fixed release — apply it.

authentik is an open-source identity provider. Prior to 2026.2.6 and 2026.5.5, an inbound SAML Source configured with the non-default USERNAME_LINK or EMAIL_LINK user-matching mode interprets an XML comment in a NameID differently from the identity provider's signed assertion. An attacker with an account on the source identity provider who can set the account's NameID can inject an XML comment that truncates the value used by authentik to the text before the comment while the signed assertion remains valid. A crafted NameID can therefore truncate to a victim's username or email and bind the attacker's external identity to the victim's existing account. This grants full takeover without the victim's password or the identity provider's private key, and the malicious link persists so later logins succeed without the comment. Sources using the default unique-identifier matching mode and authentik's outbound SAML Provider role are not affected. This issue is fixed in versions 2026.2.6 and 2026.5.5.

CVSS
9.4
EG Score
9.4CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
58
EG Risk 58/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity94% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.4 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.6% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: The CVE record names the fixed release. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
48th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.4): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.4 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.4 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.the CNA's CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

The CVE record names the fixed release. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 18, 2026

Last Modified

November 3, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Oct 2, 2026
Fix named in the CVE record. Sources: github_commit, github_pr, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Account Takeover via SAML NameID Comment Truncation · Advisory · goauthentik/authentik · GitHub

https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik/security/advisories/GHSA-35v6-hv2g-6992
GitHub pull request

security: automated internal backport of patch 1934.sec.patch to authentik-2026.5

Fix merged in goauthentik/authentik PR #24062 on 2026-07-15 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik/pull/24062
GitHub pull request

security: automated internal backport of patch 1934.sec.patch to authentik-2026.2

Fix merged in goauthentik/authentik PR #24057 on 2026-07-15 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik/pull/24057
GitHub commit

commit 8704a1b89d7b (goauthentik/authentik)

Fix landed in goauthentik/authentik commit 8704a1b89d7b — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik/commit/8704a1b89d7bf46bcef0d3c434c821b937fdecc3
GitHub commit

commit 6bd00f09f1f6 (goauthentik/authentik)

Fix landed in goauthentik/authentik commit 6bd00f09f1f6 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/goauthentik/authentik/commit/6bd00f09f1f6b5bc5212a10340418fa1b264f02c

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 30× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 167 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 67 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 22:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  4. 2026-11-12 01:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  6. 2026-11-11 03:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  8. 2026-11-10 05:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  10. 2026-11-09 08:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  12. 2026-11-08 10:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  14. 2026-11-07 12:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  16. 2026-11-06 12:55 UTCOSV refresh
  17. 2026-11-05 17:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  19. 2026-11-04 19:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  21. 2026-11-03 22:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-03 18:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  24. 2026-11-02 21:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-01 23:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  3. 2026-11-01 01:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  5. 2026-10-31 04:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  7. 2026-10-30 06:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  9. 2026-10-29 08:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  11. 2026-10-28 11:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  13. 2026-10-27 10:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  15. 2026-10-26 13:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  17. 2026-10-25 14:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-24 17:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  20. 2026-10-23 20:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  22. 2026-10-22 19:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  24. 2026-10-21 22:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  26. 2026-10-21 00:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  28. 2026-10-20 02:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  30. 2026-10-19 01:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-18 03:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  33. 2026-10-17 06:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  35. 2026-10-16 07:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  37. 2026-10-15 06:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  39. 2026-10-14 01:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  41. 2026-10-12 22:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  43. 2026-10-12 15:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-11 19:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-11 16:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-11 14:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  48. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  49. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  50. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  51. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  52. 2026-10-06 17:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  54. 2026-10-06 08:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  56. 2026-10-05 01:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  58. 2026-10-03 17:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  60. 2026-10-02 18:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  62. 2026-10-02 01:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  64. 2026-09-30 20:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  66. 2026-09-30 09:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  68. 2026-09-28 21:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  70. 2026-09-27 16:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  72. 2026-09-27 07:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  74. 2026-09-24 16:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-57580?
CVE-2026-57580 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 18, 2026. authentik is an open-source identity provider. Prior to 2026.2.6 and 2026.5.5, an inbound SAML Source configured with the non-default USERNAME_LINK or EMAIL_LINK user-matching mode interprets an XML comment in a NameID differently from the identity provider's signed assertion. An attacker with an…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-57580 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-57580 was published on August 18, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 3, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-57580 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-57580 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (48th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-57580?
CVE-2026-57580 has a CVSS base score of 9.4 (the CNA's own assessment, by github_m; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-57580?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-57580 names the fix: "This issue is fixed in versions 2026.2.6 and 2026.5.5."

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-57580

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-57580?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.