CVE-2026-57171

HIGHPre-NVD 7.78.4
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.4 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-24. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.7; sources differ by 0.7.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-66225 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-r4vp-3vw6-r2x5 (GitHub Security Advisories) · PYSEC-2026-4030 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Compliance-trestle (Trestle) is a Python SDK and command-line tool for managing OSCAL compliance documents. In versions before 3.12.4 and versions 4.0.0 through 4.0.3, the catalog-generate, profile-generate, and ssp-generate author commands write generated Markdown to an attacker-influenced output path without path-traversal validation, allowing arbitrary file write outside the Trestle workspace. These commands join the user-supplied output argument onto the Trestle root and write to the result, but guard it only with an is_directory_name_allowed() task-name-collision check rather than the PathSecurityValidator.validate_local_path() guard used by the jinja command, so an absolute path or one containing traversal sequences escapes the workspace and writes files under an attacker-chosen location as the invoking process owner. The security boundary is crossed when a trusted CI job, shared service, or wrapper derives the output argument from repository-controlled, tenant-controlled, or otherwise untrusted data while expecting output to stay inside the workspace. When --force-overwrite is used, the selected output directory is first recursively deleted, extending the primitive to destruction of an attacker-chosen directory tree and enabling indirect code execution by overwriting files a pipeline later runs. This issue is fixed in versions 3.12.4 and 4.1.0.

CVSS v3
7.7
EG Score
8.4HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
38
EG Risk 38/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity84% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.4 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
12th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.4): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.4 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.4 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-11). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 25, 2026

Last Modified

September 9, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit, github_release.
GitHub release Patch Available

v4.1.0

Patch available: oscal-compass/compliance-trestle v4.1.0

https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/releases/tag/v4.1.0
GitHub commit

commit 37ed44f5f2e0 (oscal-compass/compliance-trestle)

Fix landed in oscal-compass/compliance-trestle commit 37ed44f5f2e0 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/commit/37ed44f5f2e074202c8eb7c2f203c05d19461cdc
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Arbitrary File Write via Path Traversal in compliance-trestle - jinja · Advisory · oscal-compass/compliance-trestle · GitHub

https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/security/advisories/GHSA-4q5v-7g7x-j79w
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Incomplete fix of CVE-2026-46345: Path Traversal Arbitrary File Write in trestle author {catalog,profile,ssp}-generate output paths · Advisory · oscal-compass/compliance-trestle · GitHub

https://github.com/oscal-compass/compliance-trestle/security/advisories/GHSA-r4vp-3vw6-r2x5

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-57171(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
pipcompliance-trestle @ 3.12.4 (fixes < 3.12.4)—ghsa
pipcompliance-trestle @ 4.1.0 (fixes >= 4.0.0, < 4.1.0)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
compliance-trestle0.0.2 ... 4.0.3 (103 versions)
  • every version up to 3.12.4: fixed in 3.12.4
  • 4.0.0 up to 4.1.0: fixed in 4.1.0
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 31× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 129 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 29 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 17:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-11 17:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r4vp-3vw6-r2x5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.4
  4. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  5. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  6. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  7. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  8. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  9. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  10. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  11. 2026-11-05 04:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-05 04:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r4vp-3vw6-r2x5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.4
  13. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  14. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  15. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  16. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  17. 2026-11-01 07:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r4vp-3vw6-r2x5 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.4
  18. 2026-11-01 07:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored▲ 0.70
  19. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  20. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  21. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  22. 2026-10-29 16:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  24. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  25. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  2. 2026-10-25 14:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  4. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  5. 2026-10-23 03:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  7. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  8. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  9. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  10. 2026-10-18 03:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  12. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  13. 2026-10-16 15:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  15. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  16. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  17. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  18. 2026-10-12 15:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-11 19:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-11 16:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-11 14:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  23. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  24. 2026-10-10 10:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  26. 2026-10-09 03:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  28. 2026-10-08 02:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  30. 2026-10-06 20:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  32. 2026-10-06 07:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  34. 2026-10-05 04:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  36. 2026-10-03 16:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  38. 2026-10-02 21:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  40. 2026-10-01 20:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  42. 2026-09-30 20:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  44. 2026-09-30 06:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  46. 2026-09-28 23:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  48. 2026-09-27 22:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  50. 2026-09-26 21:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  52. 2026-09-24 20:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  54. 2026-09-23 19:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  56. 2026-09-22 18:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-09-22 06:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-09-21 05:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  60. 2026-09-19 16:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-09-19 04:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  63. 2026-09-18 03:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  65. 2026-09-16 14:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  67. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  68. 2026-09-15 13:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  70. 2026-09-14 00:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  72. 2026-09-12 23:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-09-11 23:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  75. 2026-09-11 10:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-57171?
CVE-2026-57171 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 25, 2026. Compliance-trestle (Trestle) is a Python SDK and command-line tool for managing OSCAL compliance documents. In versions before 3.12.4 and versions 4.0.0 through 4.0.3, the catalog-generate, profile-generate, and ssp-generate author commands write generated Markdown to an attacker-influenced output…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-57171 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-57171 was published on August 25, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 9, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-57171 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-57171 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (12th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-57171?
CVE-2026-57171 has a CVSS base score of 7.7 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending). EchelonGraph synthesises a secondary CVSS source + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 8.4 (HIGH).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-57171?
A fix for CVE-2026-57171 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-57171 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-57171

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-57171?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.