CVE-2026-56889

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.76.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 6.7 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-09-15. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 6.7; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory

Also known asEUVD-2026-78959 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

6.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorNo fix is confirmed yet: check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: <0.1%CVSS: 6.7Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

CVSS v3
6.7
EG Score
6.7MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
30
EG Risk 30/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity67% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.7 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule.
EPSS PROB
<0.1%
EPSS %ILE
below the 1st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (6.7): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.7 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
6.7 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
<0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-07). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Check the vendor's advisory for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation on your normal schedule.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 15, 2026

Last Modified

September 21, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026
No fix on record yet.
Web page

Pixel Update Bulletin—September 2026  |  Android Open Source Project

https://source.android.com/docs/security/bulletin/pixel/2026/2026-09-01

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-56889(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 21× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 106 rows on record for this CVE, as 98 entries (2 repeats merged).

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 6 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  4. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  5. 2026-11-07 19:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  6. 2026-11-07 19:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  8. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  9. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  10. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  11. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  12. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  13. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  14. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  15. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  16. 2026-10-25 14:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  18. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  19. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  20. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 03:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  23. 2026-10-15 23:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-15 23:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  25. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
Show 73 more
  1. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  4. 2026-10-12 15:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-10-11 19:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-10-11 16:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-10-11 14:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  9. 2026-10-11 05:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-10-11 05:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  11. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  12. 2026-10-10 04:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-10-10 04:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  14. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  15. 2026-10-09 04:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-09 04:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  17. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  18. 2026-10-08 04:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-08 04:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  20. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  21. 2026-10-07 03:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-07 03:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  23. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  24. 2026-10-06 03:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  25. 2026-10-06 03:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  26. 2026-10-05 03:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-05 03:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  28. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  29. 2026-10-04 02:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-04 02:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  31. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  32. 2026-10-03 02:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-03 02:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  34. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  35. 2026-10-02 01:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-02 01:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  37. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  38. 2026-10-01 01:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-01 01:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  40. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  41. 2026-09-30 01:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-09-30 01:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  43. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  44. 2026-09-28 20:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-09-28 20:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  46. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  47. 2026-09-27 20:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  48. 2026-09-26 20:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-09-26 20:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  50. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  51. 2026-09-25 19:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  52. 2026-09-24 18:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-09-24 18:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  54. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  55. 2026-09-23 18:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-09-23 18:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  57. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  58. 2026-09-22 17:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-09-22 17:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  60. 2026-09-21 17:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  61. 2026-09-21 05:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  62. 2026-09-20 05:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-09-20 05:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  64. 2026-09-19 05:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  65. 2026-09-18 04:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-09-18 04:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  67. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS <0.1% · below the 1st percentile
  68. 2026-09-17 04:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  69. 2026-09-17 04:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  70. 2026-09-16 19:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-09-16 19:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf · GitHub CVSS 6.7
  72. 2026-09-16 16:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xv6f-qgr5-frxf
  73. 2026-09-16 15:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 6.7 MEDIUM

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-56889?
CVE-2026-56889 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 15, 2026. In multiple locations, there is a possible permission bypass due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-56889 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-56889 was published on September 15, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 21, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-56889 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-56889 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a <0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (below the 1st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-56889?
CVE-2026-56889 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.7 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-56889?
No fix for CVE-2026-56889 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-56889 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-56889

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-56889?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.