CVE-2026-56397

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.69.6
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.6 under the CNA's CVSS (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (43rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from the CNA's CVSS
Sources: the CNA's CVSS, EPSS
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-38163 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7 (GitHub Security Advisories) · GO-2026-4720 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.6EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 9.6Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

SiYuan before v3.6.1 fails to sanitize package metadata and README content in the Bazaar marketplace, allowing malicious package authors to inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript. Attackers can achieve remote code execution on any user browsing the Bazaar by embedding XSS payloads in package displayName, description, or README fields, exploiting Electron's nodeIntegration setting to execute OS commands.

CVSS v3
9.6
EG Score
9.6CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
59
EG Risk 59/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity96% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.6 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
43rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.6): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.6 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.6 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.the CNA's CVSS · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 21, 2026

Last Modified

November 8, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Oct 7, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Remote Code Execution via Malicious Bazaar Package — Marketplace XSS · Advisory · siyuan-note/siyuan · GitHub

https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/security/advisories/GHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
Web page

SiYuan - Remote Code Execution via Malicious Bazaar Package Metadata and README | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/siyuan-remote-code-execution-via-malicious-bazaar-package-metadata-and-readme-2

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-56397(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
gogithub.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel—
  • every version through 0.0.0-20260313024916-fd6526133bb3: no fix on record
  • every version up to 0.0.0-20260317012524-fe4523fff2c8: fixed in 0.0.0-20260317012524-fe4523fff2c8
—
siyuan—
  • every version through 0.0.0-20260313024916-fd6526133bb3: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 59× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 533 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 433 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 17:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-12 17:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  3. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  4. 2026-11-11 16:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-11 16:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  6. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  7. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  8. 2026-11-10 15:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-10 15:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  10. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  11. 2026-11-09 15:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-09 15:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  13. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  14. 2026-11-08 14:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-08 14:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  16. 2026-11-08 06:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-08 06:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  18. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  19. 2026-11-07 05:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-07 05:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  21. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  22. 2026-11-06 12:25 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-11-06 04:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-06 04:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  25. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 03:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-05 03:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  3. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  4. 2026-11-04 02:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-04 02:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  6. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  7. 2026-11-03 01:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-03 01:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  9. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  10. 2026-11-02 01:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-02 01:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  12. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  13. 2026-11-01 00:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-01 00:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
  15. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-30 23:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-30 23:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
  18. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-29 22:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-29 22:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
  21. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-28 21:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-28 21:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
  24. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-27 20:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-27 20:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
  27. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  28. 2026-10-26 19:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-26 19:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
  30. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  31. 2026-10-25 16:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-25 16:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
  33. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  34. 2026-10-25 14:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  36. 2026-10-24 15:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-24 15:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
  38. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  39. 2026-10-23 15:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-23 15:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
  41. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  42. 2026-10-22 14:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-22 14:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
  44. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  45. 2026-10-21 13:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-21 13:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
  47. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  48. 2026-10-20 12:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-20 12:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
  50. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  51. 2026-10-19 11:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-19 11:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
  53. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  54. 2026-10-18 09:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
  55. 2026-10-18 03:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  57. 2026-10-17 08:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-17 08:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
  59. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  60. 2026-10-16 07:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-16 07:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
  62. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  63. 2026-10-15 06:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-15 06:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
  65. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  66. 2026-10-14 01:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-14 01:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
  68. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  69. 2026-10-12 22:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-12 22:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
  71. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  72. 2026-10-12 15:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-12 06:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
  74. 2026-10-11 19:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-11 16:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-56397?
CVE-2026-56397 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 21, 2026. SiYuan before v3.6.1 fails to sanitize package metadata and README content in the Bazaar marketplace, allowing malicious package authors to inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript. Attackers can achieve remote code execution on any user browsing the Bazaar by embedding XSS payloads in package…
When was CVE-2026-56397 made public?
CVE-2026-56397 was made public on March 14, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on June 21, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 8, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-56397 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-56397 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (43rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-56397?
CVE-2026-56397 has a CVSS base score of 9.6 (the CNA's own assessment, by vulncheck; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-56397?
A fix for CVE-2026-56397 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-56397 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-56397

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-56397?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.