CVE-2026-54916

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This high-severity CVE scores 8.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (49th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-82414 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationNo fix is confirmed yet: check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

NetBox Device Type Library is a collection of community-sourced device type definitions for import into NetBox. The absence of tests/init.py and the lack of --import-mode=importlib cause pytest prepend import mode to place the tests directory at the front of sys.path during collection. An unauthenticated contributor can add a module such as tests/git.py that shadows GitPython when tests/definitions_test.py executes from git import Git, Repo, or add tests/conftest.py for automatic collection-time execution. Python imports and runs the pull-request module before any test function, allowing arbitrary code execution on the GitHub Actions runner, test-result tampering, and access to tokens or network resources exposed to the workflow. This module-shadowing path is independent of the earlier pickle deserialization flaw and the separately tracked NETBOX_DT_LIBRARY_URL issue. This vulnerability is fixed by commit b0d9a3dadd0a0a9d3c93b0b2777559fd4bad1037.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.6% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
49th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-05). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Check with the vendor for a fixed release; until one is applied, restrict network exposure of the affected system on your normal schedule.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

No released fix is confirmed on this page, but CISA's timeline does not wait for a fix's release: it starts when an agency identifies the flaw on an asset and updates the CDM Agency and Federal Dashboard, and the directive counts patching, decommissioning the system or another action as remediation. Until a fixed release is applied, mitigate as this page's verdict says. In the directive's words, “Fix on system upgrade” means that, “unless conditions change”, the vulnerability “should be remediated the next time the vulnerable asset receives a scheduled major upgrade or rebuild”: its timelines are “dynamic as facts change”, and a KEV listing shortens them.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 17, 2026

Last Modified

September 24, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 17, 2026
No fix on record yet. Sources: github, github_pr, github_commit.
GitHub commit

commit b0d9a3dadd0a (netbox-community/devicetype-library)

Fix landed in netbox-community/devicetype-library commit b0d9a3dadd0a — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/netbox-community/devicetype-library/commit/b0d9a3dadd0a0a9d3c93b0b2777559fd4bad1037
GitHub pull request

GHSA Resolution 2

Fix merged in netbox-community/devicetype-library PR #4239 on 2026-06-10 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/netbox-community/devicetype-library/pull/4239
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Module-shadowing remote code execution in the CI test harness (missing tests/__init__.py) · Advisory · netbox-community/devicetype-library · GitHub

https://github.com/netbox-community/devicetype-library/security/advisories/GHSA-wwg5-825x-83g6

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 30× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  3. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  4. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  5. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  6. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  7. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  8. 2026-11-06 15:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  10. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  11. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  12. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  13. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  14. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  15. 2026-10-30 19:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  17. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  18. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  19. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  20. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  21. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  22. 2026-10-25 14:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  24. 2026-10-23 23:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
Show 65 more
  1. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  2. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  3. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  4. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  5. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  6. 2026-10-18 03:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  8. 2026-10-17 03:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  10. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  11. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  12. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  13. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  14. 2026-10-12 15:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-11 19:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-11 16:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-11 14:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  19. 2026-10-10 22:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  21. 2026-10-09 21:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  23. 2026-10-08 20:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  25. 2026-10-08 06:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  27. 2026-10-06 15:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  29. 2026-10-06 03:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  31. 2026-10-05 03:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  33. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  35. 2026-10-03 02:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  37. 2026-10-02 01:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  39. 2026-10-01 01:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  41. 2026-09-30 00:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  43. 2026-09-28 23:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  45. 2026-09-27 23:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  47. 2026-09-26 22:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  49. 2026-09-26 10:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-09-24 21:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  52. 2026-09-23 21:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  54. 2026-09-22 21:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-09-22 08:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-09-21 08:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  58. 2026-09-19 19:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-09-19 07:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  61. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-09-18 18:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-09-17 21:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-09-17 20:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 8.8 HIGH
  65. 2026-09-17 20:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-54916?
CVE-2026-54916 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 17, 2026. NetBox Device Type Library is a collection of community-sourced device type definitions for import into NetBox. The absence of tests/init.py and the lack of --import-mode=importlib cause pytest prepend import mode to place the tests directory at the front of sys.path during collection. An…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-54916 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-54916 was published on September 17, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 24, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-54916 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-54916 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (49th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-54916?
CVE-2026-54916 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-54916?
No fix for CVE-2026-54916 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch for a fix.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-54916

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-54916?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.