CVE-2026-54745

CRITICALPre-NVD 10.010.0
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This critical-severity CVE scores 10.0 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (50th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-67790 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

10.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 10.0Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Kubeflow Pipelines enables users to build and deploy portable, scalable machine learning workflows. Prior to 2.17.0, the Kubeflow Pipelines frontend exposes an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability through the /_proxy/ route in frontend/server/proxy-middleware.ts. The _routePathWithReferer() function accepts an arbitrary attacker-controlled HTTP or HTTPS target and passes its origin to createProxyMiddleware without a host allowlist or filtering for loopback, link-local, RFC1918, or cluster-local addresses. The route remains outside the authorization middleware when ENABLE_AUTHZ=true and is reachable through /apis/v1beta1/_proxy/, /apis/v2beta1/_proxy/, /pipeline/apis/v1beta1/_proxy/, and /pipeline/apis/v2beta1/_proxy/, including through a crafted Referer header. Requests can forward attacker-controlled methods, headers such as Authorization, Cookie, and X-Forwarded-For, and POST bodies to reachable internal services, while returning the upstream response to the unauthenticated client. This can expose cloud metadata credentials, Kubernetes or service APIs, and other cluster-internal endpoints to unauthorized read or modification. This issue is fixed in version 2.17.0.

CVSS v3
10.0
EG Score
10.0CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
76
EG Risk 76/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity100% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 10.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
50th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (10.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 10.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
10.0 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 28, 2026

Last Modified

September 9, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Nov 6, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit, github_pr, github_release.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)🟡 PoC Available

Unauthenticated SSRF and HTTP smuggling in Kubeflow Pipelines frontend /_proxy/ route, bypasses ENABLE_AUTHZ=true · Advisory · kubeflow/pipelines · GitHub

https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/security/advisories/GHSA-gqww-5pj5-8fq7
GitHub release Patch Available

Version 2.17.0

Patch available: kubeflow/pipelines 2.17.0

https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/releases/tag/2.17.0
GitHub pull request Patch Available

fix(frontend): harden TensorBoard proxy access

Patch available: kubeflow/pipelines sdk-2.17.0-1 (PR #13511 merged 2026-06-10)

https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/pull/13511
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit a35f97aa4c17 (kubeflow/pipelines)

Patch available: kubeflow/pipelines sdk-2.17.0-1 (contains commit a35f97aa4c17)

https://github.com/kubeflow/pipelines/commit/a35f97aa4c17b25572369e5022546ab4421bdbdd

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 30× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 153 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 53 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 15:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  4. 2026-11-12 15:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  6. 2026-11-11 15:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  8. 2026-11-10 15:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  10. 2026-11-09 15:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  12. 2026-11-08 15:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  14. 2026-11-07 15:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  16. 2026-11-06 15:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-06 12:25 UTCOSV refresh
  18. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  19. 2026-11-05 15:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  21. 2026-11-04 15:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  23. 2026-11-03 15:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  25. 2026-11-02 15:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  2. 2026-11-01 15:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  4. 2026-10-31 15:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  6. 2026-10-30 15:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  8. 2026-10-29 15:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  10. 2026-10-28 15:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  12. 2026-10-27 15:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  14. 2026-10-26 15:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  16. 2026-10-25 14:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  18. 2026-10-24 14:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  20. 2026-10-23 15:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  22. 2026-10-22 15:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  24. 2026-10-21 14:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  26. 2026-10-20 15:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  28. 2026-10-19 14:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-18 03:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  31. 2026-10-17 14:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  33. 2026-10-16 14:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  35. 2026-10-15 14:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  37. 2026-10-14 09:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  39. 2026-10-13 06:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  41. 2026-10-12 15:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-11 19:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-11 16:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-11 14:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  46. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  47. 2026-10-10 00:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  49. 2026-10-09 02:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  51. 2026-10-08 00:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  53. 2026-10-06 15:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  55. 2026-10-05 20:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  57. 2026-10-04 23:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  59. 2026-10-03 17:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  61. 2026-10-02 18:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  63. 2026-10-02 00:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  65. 2026-09-30 19:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  67. 2026-09-30 03:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  69. 2026-09-29 01:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-09-28 15:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  72. 2026-09-27 14:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  74. 2026-09-26 20:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-54745?
CVE-2026-54745 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 28, 2026. Kubeflow Pipelines enables users to build and deploy portable, scalable machine learning workflows. Prior to 2.17.0, the Kubeflow Pipelines frontend exposes an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability through the /_proxy/ route in frontend/server/proxy-middleware.ts. The…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-54745 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-54745 was published on August 28, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 9, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-54745 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-54745 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (50th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-54745?
CVE-2026-54745 has a CVSS base score of 10.0 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-54745?
A fix for CVE-2026-54745 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-54745

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-54745?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.