Nimiq is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to 1.6.0, a malicious state-sync peer can crash a syncing node by sending a crafted TrieChunk whose proof contains a TrieNodeChild suffix that is individually valid but exceeds the 63-byte KeyNibbles backing array when combined with the parent key. KeyNibbles::Add in primitives/src/key_nibbles.rs performs the combined slice operation without checking the total length, and the input reaches put_chunk, TrieNodeChild::key, and TrieNodeChild::is_stump before proof.verify, so the attacker does not need a valid cryptographic proof. Exploitation requires the attacker to be selected as the victim's sync peer during state sync. The resulting out-of-bounds panic is transient because the node restarts and resynchronizes. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.0.
CVE-2026-54542
This low-severity CVE scores 3.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 80% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 3.7
- EG Score
- 3.7(medium)
- EG Risk
- 17(Track)EG Risk 17/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity37% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 20%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
July 16, 2026
Last Modified
September 14, 2026
References (4)
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/commit/eabfc3e21731b0628c3f933163a0f1e1864217bf
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/pull/3790
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/releases/tag/v1.6.0
- security-advisories@githubhttps://github.com/nimiq/core-rs-albatross/security/advisories/GHSA-5rg2-xv9j-gv5p
Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-54542(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 0× in last 7d / 0× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 04:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-14 20:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 20:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 16:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-01 11:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-26 11:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 03:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-16 20:04 UTCEG score recompute
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-54542?
When was CVE-2026-54542 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-54542 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-54542?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-54542?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-54542
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-54542?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.