CVE-2026-53709

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (49th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-98769 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

MCP Context Forge is an MCP gateway and administrative platform. Prior to 1.0.2, mcpgateway/config.py and .env.example ship a known JWT_SECRET_KEY, while verify_jwt_token() accepts HS256 tokens signed with that key and get_current_user() creates a platform administrator when the token subject matches PLATFORM_ADMIN_EMAIL and REQUIRE_USER_IN_DB is false. A remote unauthenticated attacker can therefore mint accepted administrator tokens without a database account. While the vulnerable signing key remains configured and the platform-admin bootstrap remains enabled, forged access survives password rotation, account deletion, and session revocation, allowing administrative disclosure, modification, and service disruption. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.2.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
75
EG Risk 75/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
49th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 13, 2026

Last Modified

October 16, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Nov 7, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit, github_release.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)🟡 PoC Available

Hardcoded default JWT_SECRET_KEY shipped in source and .env.example enables pre-authentication platform admin token forgery (CWE-321) · Advisory · IBM/mcp-context-forge · GitHub

https://github.com/IBM/mcp-context-forge/security/advisories/GHSA-m8rv-5m6m-32ff
GitHub release Patch Available

v1.0.2 - Admin UI Rewrite, Database Migrations, Security Enhancements, and Bug Fixes

Patch available: IBM/mcp-context-forge v1.0.2

https://github.com/IBM/mcp-context-forge/releases/tag/v1.0.2
GitHub commit

commit 2af690f894b6 (IBM/mcp-context-forge)

Fix landed in IBM/mcp-context-forge commit 2af690f894b6 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/IBM/mcp-context-forge/commit/2af690f894b6e35f5f21190fdab1505f023a5272

Weakness Classification(4)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 31× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-13 02:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  3. 2026-11-12 02:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  5. 2026-11-11 02:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  7. 2026-11-10 02:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  9. 2026-11-09 02:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  11. 2026-11-08 02:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  13. 2026-11-07 02:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  15. 2026-11-06 11:55 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-11-06 02:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  18. 2026-11-05 02:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  20. 2026-11-04 02:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  22. 2026-11-03 02:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  24. 2026-11-02 02:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
Show 43 more
  1. 2026-11-01 02:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  3. 2026-10-31 02:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 03:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  7. 2026-10-29 03:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  9. 2026-10-28 03:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  11. 2026-10-27 02:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  13. 2026-10-25 22:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  15. 2026-10-25 14:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-24 22:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  18. 2026-10-23 22:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  20. 2026-10-22 22:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  22. 2026-10-21 22:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  24. 2026-10-20 23:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  26. 2026-10-19 23:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  28. 2026-10-18 22:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  30. 2026-10-18 03:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-17 22:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  33. 2026-10-16 22:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-16 22:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-16 20:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  37. 2026-10-16 00:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  39. 2026-10-14 19:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  41. 2026-10-13 15:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-13 14:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 9.8 CRITICAL
  43. 2026-10-13 14:49 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53709?
CVE-2026-53709 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 13, 2026. MCP Context Forge is an MCP gateway and administrative platform. Prior to 1.0.2, mcpgateway/config.py and .env.example ship a known JWT_SECRET_KEY, while verify_jwt_token() accepts HS256 tokens signed with that key and get_current_user() creates a platform administrator when the token subject…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-53709 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-53709 was published on October 13, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 16, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-53709 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53709 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (49th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53709?
CVE-2026-53709 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53709?
A fix for CVE-2026-53709 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-53709

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53709?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.