CVE-2026-53658

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.36.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This medium-severity CVE scores 6.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (39th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-78835 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-xghw-p77p-3r7x (GitHub Security Advisories) · GO-2026-6234 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

6.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 6.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Fabric CA is a Certificate Authority for Hyperledger Fabric. Prior to 1.5.21, when fabric-ca is configured with an LDAP backend, Client.GetUser in lib/server/ldap/client.go inserts the username from HTTP Basic authentication into the LDAP uid search UserFilter without escaping LDAP metacharacters. An unauthenticated attacker with network access to the CA enrollment endpoint can alter the LDAP search before password validation and potentially steer authentication attempts toward a victim account. Deployments that do not use an LDAP backend are unaffected. This issue is fixed in version 1.5.21.

CVSS
6.3
EG Score
6.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
44
EG Risk 44/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity63% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 6.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
39th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (6.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
6.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 14, 2026

Last Modified

September 30, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 15, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_pr, github_commit, github_release.
GitHub release Patch Available

v1.5.21

Patch available: hyperledger/fabric-ca v1.5.21

https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric-ca/releases/tag/v1.5.21
GitHub commit

commit d379df823534 (hyperledger/fabric-ca)

Fix landed in hyperledger/fabric-ca commit d379df823534 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric-ca/commit/d379df823534d56dec0166a6da8f0415e3beee24
GitHub pull request

Escape LDAP user filter

Fix merged in hyperledger/fabric-ca PR #501 on 2026-05-29 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric-ca/pull/501
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

LDAP Injection via Unescaped Username in GetUser Filter · Advisory · hyperledger/fabric-ca · GitHub

https://github.com/hyperledger/fabric-ca/security/advisories/GHSA-xghw-p77p-3r7x

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53658(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
gogithub.com/hyperledger/fabric-ca @ 1.5.21 (fixes <= 1.5.20)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/hyperledger/fabric-ca—
  • every version up to 1.5.21: fixed in 1.5.21
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 32× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  3. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  4. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  5. 2026-11-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  6. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  7. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  8. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  9. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  10. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  11. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  12. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  13. 2026-11-01 07:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xghw-p77p-3r7x · GitHub severity MODERATE
  14. 2026-11-01 07:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  16. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  17. 2026-10-30 11:55 UTCOSV refresh
  18. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  19. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  20. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 38th percentile
  21. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 38th percentile
  22. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 38th percentile
  23. 2026-10-25 14:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 38th percentile
  25. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 38th percentile
Show 60 more
  1. 2026-10-22 21:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 38th percentile
  3. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 38th percentile
  4. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  5. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  6. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  7. 2026-10-18 03:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  9. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  10. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  11. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  12. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  13. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  14. 2026-10-12 15:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-11 19:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-11 16:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-11 14:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  19. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  20. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  21. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  22. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  23. 2026-10-06 17:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  25. 2026-10-05 19:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  27. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  28. 2026-10-03 19:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  30. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  31. 2026-10-02 15:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  33. 2026-09-30 17:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  35. 2026-09-29 15:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  36. 2026-09-29 04:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  38. 2026-09-28 06:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  40. 2026-09-27 09:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  42. 2026-09-25 03:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  44. 2026-09-24 02:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  46. 2026-09-23 04:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-09-22 07:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-09-21 09:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  50. 2026-09-20 09:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-09-19 11:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 18th percentile
  53. 2026-09-18 12:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-09-16 16:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-09-16 15:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 17th percentile
  57. 2026-09-15 17:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-09-15 16:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 6.3 MEDIUM
  59. 2026-09-15 16:42 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS → 6.3 · CVSS v4 → 6.3
  60. 2026-08-14 20:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53658?
CVE-2026-53658 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 14, 2026. Fabric CA is a Certificate Authority for Hyperledger Fabric. Prior to 1.5.21, when fabric-ca is configured with an LDAP backend, Client.GetUser in lib/server/ldap/client.go inserts the username from HTTP Basic authentication into the LDAP uid search UserFilter without escaping LDAP metacharacters.…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-53658 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-53658 was published on August 14, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 30, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-53658 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53658 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (39th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53658?
CVE-2026-53658 has a CVSS base score of 6.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53658?
A fix for CVE-2026-53658 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-53658 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53658

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53658?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.