nebula-mesh is a self-hosted control plane for Slack Nebula mesh VPN. Prior to version 0.3.7, two related authorization gaps let a host that should no longer be trusted obtain a fresh, valid Nebula certificate, because nebula-mgmt does not re-evaluate revocation/authorization state at certificate issuance time — only at poll time. Firstly, the blocklist is not enforced at sign / re-enroll time. internal/api/enroll.go:128 calls caMgr.Sign(...) without consulting the blocklist. The blocklist is only checked in the poll path (internal/api/updates.go:57, fingerprintInBlocklist). The blocklist is keyed by certificate fingerprint (internal/store/sqlite.go), so a re-enrollment produces a new fingerprint that is not in the blocklist. Secondly, renewal does not re-validate operator / CA status. Auto-renewal at poll time (internal/api/updates.go:285-319, signHostCert) reads host.Name, host.Groups, host.NebulaIPs from the DB and re-signs without checking whether the owning operator is still active or the CA still valid. DisableOperator (internal/store/sqlite_operators.go) revokes sessions and API keys but does not retire the operator's CAs, and pki/signer.go checks only CA cert time-expiry, not operator/CA status. This issue has been patched in version 0.3.7.
CVE-2026-53602
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.9 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2%, top 87% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 6.9
- EG Score
- 6.9(medium)
- EG Risk
- 31(Track)EG Risk 31/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity69% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 13%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
July 9, 2026
Last Modified
September 8, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Sep 4, 2026v0.3.7
Patch available: forgekeep/nebula-mesh v0.3.7
https://github.com/forgekeep/nebula-mesh/releases/tag/v0.3.7Security audit — full code review & offensive assessment · Issue #178 · forgekeep/nebula-mesh · GitHub
https://github.com/forgekeep/nebula-mesh/issues/178Host revocation is not durable: blocked/offboarded hosts can regain a valid certificate · Advisory · forgekeep/nebula-mesh · GitHub
https://github.com/forgekeep/nebula-mesh/security/advisories/GHSA-339v-266x-79xrVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53602(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/forgekeep/nebula-mesh | — | 0.3.7 | — |
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 19× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 05:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-14 08:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-13 08:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 03:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-08 22:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-05 22:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 20:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 20:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 19:45 UTCEG score recompute▲ 6.90
- 2026-09-04 19:44 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 6.9 · CVSS v4 → 6.9
- 2026-07-31 23:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-26 12:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 03:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-09 21:46 UTCEG score recompute
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-285 · CWE-862
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-53602?
When was CVE-2026-53602 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-53602 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53602?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53602?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53602
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53602?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.