CVE-2026-50195

CRITICALNVD 9.99.9
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.9 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-06-19. NVD baseline CVSS 9.9; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2026-41108 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-cvxm-645q-p574 (GitHub Security Advisories) · GO-2026-5338 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.9EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 9.9Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

containerd is an open-source container runtime. Versions prior to 2.3.2, 2.2.5 and 2.1.9 contain a vulnerability in the CRI checkpoint import process where it fails to validate the image references specified within a checkpoint image's configuration. An attacker with permissions to create pods can use a crafted checkpoint image to force containerd to pull a malicious image and assign it an arbitrary local tag, thereby poisoning the node's local image cache. Subsequently, if other pods on the same node attempt to use the poisoned tag with an IfNotPresent (or Never) pull policy, they will unknowingly execute the attacker's malicious image instead of the legitimate one. This can lead to a compromise of the affected pods, allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code under the victim pod's identity. This issue has been fixed in versions 2.3.2, 2.2.5 and 2.1.9.

CVSS v3
9.9
EG Score
9.9CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
45
EG Risk 45/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity99% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
23rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.9 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.9 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 19, 2026

Last Modified

July 2, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Nov 6, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

CRI checkpoint import allows local image tag poisoning · Advisory · containerd/containerd · GitHub

https://github.com/containerd/containerd/security/advisories/GHSA-cvxm-645q-p574

Patch Availability(6)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntucontainerd-stable (2.2.2-0ubuntu1.1) @ resolute2026-11-12ubuntu
ubuntucontainerd (2.2.2-0ubuntu1.1) @ resolute2026-11-12ubuntu
redhattrivy-main-0.72.0-0.1.hum12026-07-02redhat
gogithub.com/containerd/containerd/v2 @ 2.1.9 (fixes >= 2.1.0, < 2.1.9)—ghsa
gogithub.com/containerd/containerd/v2 @ 2.2.5 (fixes >= 2.2.0, < 2.2.5)—ghsa
gogithub.com/containerd/containerd/v2 @ 2.3.2 (fixes >= 2.3.0, < 2.3.2)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Go(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/containerd/containerd—
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
github.com/containerd/containerd/v2—
  • 2.1.0 up to 2.1.9: fixed in 2.1.9
  • 2.2.0 up to 2.2.5: fixed in 2.2.5
  • 2.3.0 up to 2.3.2: fixed in 2.3.2
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
containerd—
  • 2.1.0 up to 2.3.2-r0: fixed in 2.3.2-r0
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
containerd1.7.24~ds1-10 ... 2.1.6+ds1-1 (13 versions)
  • every version up to 2.1.9+ds1-1: fixed in 2.1.9+ds1-1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(2)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 22× in last 7d / 72× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 467 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 367 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 04:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 04:16 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-13 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cvxm-645q-p574 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  4. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  5. 2026-11-12 03:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-12 03:31 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-12 03:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cvxm-645q-p574 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  8. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  9. 2026-11-11 02:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-11 02:50 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-11 02:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cvxm-645q-p574 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  12. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  13. 2026-11-10 01:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-10 01:57 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-10 01:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cvxm-645q-p574 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  16. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  17. 2026-11-09 01:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-09 01:17 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-09 01:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cvxm-645q-p574 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  20. 2026-11-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  21. 2026-11-08 00:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-08 00:37 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-08 00:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cvxm-645q-p574 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  24. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  25. 2026-11-06 23:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-06 23:56 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-11-06 23:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cvxm-645q-p574 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  3. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  4. 2026-11-06 10:55 UTCOSV refresh
  5. 2026-11-05 23:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-05 23:16 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-05 23:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cvxm-645q-p574 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  8. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  9. 2026-11-04 22:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-04 22:36 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-04 22:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cvxm-645q-p574 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  12. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  13. 2026-11-03 21:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-03 21:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cvxm-645q-p574 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  15. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  16. 2026-11-02 21:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-02 21:13 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-02 21:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cvxm-645q-p574 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  19. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  20. 2026-11-01 20:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-01 20:34 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-11-01 20:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cvxm-645q-p574 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  23. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  24. 2026-11-01 07:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cvxm-645q-p574 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  25. 2026-11-01 07:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-31 19:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-31 19:53 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  29. 2026-10-30 19:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-30 19:13 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  32. 2026-10-29 18:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-29 18:32 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  35. 2026-10-28 17:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-28 17:52 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  38. 2026-10-27 17:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-27 17:12 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  41. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  44. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  45. 2026-10-25 15:38 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-25 14:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  48. 2026-10-24 14:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-24 14:52 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  51. 2026-10-23 14:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-23 14:11 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  54. 2026-10-22 13:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-22 13:31 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  57. 2026-10-21 12:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-21 12:50 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  60. 2026-10-20 12:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-20 12:10 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  63. 2026-10-19 11:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-19 11:26 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  66. 2026-10-18 09:03 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-18 03:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  69. 2026-10-17 08:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-17 08:07 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  72. 2026-10-16 07:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-16 07:27 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  75. 2026-10-15 06:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-50195?
CVE-2026-50195 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 19, 2026. containerd is an open-source container runtime. Versions prior to 2.3.2, 2.2.5 and 2.1.9 contain a vulnerability in the CRI checkpoint import process where it fails to validate the image references specified within a checkpoint image's configuration. An attacker with permissions to create pods can…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-50195 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-50195 was published on June 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of July 2, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-50195 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-50195 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (23rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-50195?
CVE-2026-50195 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.9 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-50195?
A fix for CVE-2026-50195 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-50195 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-50195

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-50195?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.