The source-controller is a Kubernetes operator, specialised in artifacts acquisition from external sources such as Git, OCI, Helm repositories and S3-compatible buckets. In versions 0.0.17 through 1.8.4, an actor with the ability to influence the contents of a bucket referenced by a Bucket resource can cause source-controller to write fetched object data to paths outside the per-reconciliation working directory. The corruption surface is bounded by source-controller's own and downstream Flux controllers' digest verification: source-controller verifies stored artifact digests during reconciliation and rebuilds on divergence; consumers (kustomize-controller, helm-controller) verify the digest of fetched artifacts and reject mismatches. These checks prevent a manipulated artifact from reaching the cluster, but an attacker can still write files anywhere the source-controller pod has permission to write. Separately, a user with permission to create or update GitRepository resources can cause source-controller to test for the existence of paths outside the cloned repository. Because the result is exposed via the resource's status, this allows limited enumeration of file paths on the controller pod. This surface exists only on source-controller v1.6.0 and later, where the sparse-checkout feature was introduced. This vulnerability was fixed in source-controller v1.8.5. There is no in-product workaround. Users should upgrade to a patched version. As a defense-in-depth measure for the GitRepository sparse-checkout surface, a ValidatingAdmissionPolicy (or a third-party policy engine such as Kyverno or OPA Gatekeeper) can be deployed to reject GitRepository resources whose .spec.sparseCheckout entries contain .. or absolute path segments.
CVE-2026-47680
This medium-severity CVE scores 5.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 74% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 5.3
- EG Score
- 5.3(medium)
- EG Risk
- 24(Track)EG Risk 24/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity53% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 26%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
June 5, 2026
Last Modified
September 9, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Sep 8, 2026commit 759bd6c451e7 (fluxcd/source-controller)
Fix landed in fluxcd/source-controller commit 759bd6c451e7 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/fluxcd/source-controller/commit/759bd6c451e7cc4327b38f42c8b671980165cb0eImprove path handling in source reconcilers
Fix merged in fluxcd/source-controller PR #2054 on 2026-05-19 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/fluxcd/source-controller/pull/2054Improper path handling allows traversal · Advisory · fluxcd/source-controller · GitHub
https://github.com/fluxcd/source-controller/security/advisories/GHSA-jjrm-hr5f-673xVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-47680(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/fluxcd/source-controller | — | 1.8.5 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 12× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-14 05:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-09 13:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 13:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 23:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-08 23:13 UTCEG score recompute▲ 5.30
- 2026-09-08 23:13 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 5.3 · CVSS v4 → 5.3
- 2026-08-01 11:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-26 21:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-23 03:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-05 16:57 UTCEG score recompute
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-47680?
When was CVE-2026-47680 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-47680 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-47680?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-47680?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-47680
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-47680?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.