CVE-2026-47407

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.49.4
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.4 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (23rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-46319 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65 (GitHub Security Advisories) · PYSEC-2026-482 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 9.4Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 0.1.4, the Platform server exposes resources under /api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/... and protects them with a require_workspace_member(workspace_id) FastAPI dependency. The dependency only checks that the caller is a member of the workspace_id in the URL prefix. The route handlers then look up the inner resource (agent_id, issue_id, project_id, label_id, comment_id, dependency_id) by primary key alone. The resource's own workspace_id is never compared to the URL's workspace_id. A user can therefore put their own workspace in the URL prefix and any other workspace's resource ID in the path. The auth check passes, since they really are a member of the prefix workspace. The service then returns the cross-tenant resource for read, update, or delete. There is a second bug in the member-management routes (add_member, update_member_role, remove_member, update_workspace, delete_workspace). Each one inherits the default min_role="member" from require_workspace_member. Any basic member can therefore promote themselves to admin or owner, demote or remove other members, and delete the workspace. The role hierarchy exists in the schema but is not enforced. Registration is open at /api/v1/auth/register with no email verification. The default server bind is 0.0.0.0:8000 (python -m praisonai_platform). One curl from any unauthenticated network position is enough to bootstrap into the system. PraisonAI Platform version 0.1.4 patches the issue.

CVSS
9.4
EG Score
9.4CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
58
EG Risk 58/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity94% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.4 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
23rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.4): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.4 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.4 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 29, 2026

Last Modified

October 24, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Oct 2, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github_pr, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Cross-workspace IDOR + member-role privilege escalation in PraisonAI Platform · Advisory · MervinPraison/PraisonAI · GitHub

https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65
GitHub pull request Patch Available

refactor: security batch 3 — platform service scoping (do not auto-merge)

Patch available: MervinPraison/PraisonAI v4.6.148 (PR #1686 merged 2026-05-19)

https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/pull/1686
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 24385d648765 (MervinPraison/PraisonAI)

Patch available: MervinPraison/PraisonAI v4.6.148 (contains commit 24385d648765)

https://github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/commit/24385d64876577620f749957bd4814f162f4ca47

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-47407(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
pippraisonai-platform @ 0.1.4 (fixes <= 0.1.2)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
praisonai-platform0.1.0, 0.1.1, 0.1.2, 0.1.3
  • every version up to 0.1.4: fixed in 0.1.4
—

Weakness Classification(3)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 179 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 79 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-12 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  3. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  4. 2026-11-11 16:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-11 16:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  6. 2026-11-11 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  7. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  8. 2026-11-10 16:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-10 16:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  10. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  11. 2026-11-09 16:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-09 16:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  13. 2026-11-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  14. 2026-11-08 15:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-08 15:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  16. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  17. 2026-11-07 15:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-07 15:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  19. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  20. 2026-11-06 15:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-06 15:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  22. 2026-11-06 10:25 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-11-05 15:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-05 15:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  25. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-04 15:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-04 15:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  3. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  4. 2026-11-03 14:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-03 14:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  6. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  7. 2026-11-02 14:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-02 14:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  9. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  10. 2026-11-01 14:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  11. 2026-11-01 07:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-h8q5-cp56-rr65 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  12. 2026-11-01 07:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  14. 2026-10-31 13:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 23rd percentile
  16. 2026-10-30 13:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-29 13:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-28 13:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-26 23:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  24. 2026-10-25 19:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  26. 2026-10-25 14:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-24 19:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  29. 2026-10-24 12:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  31. 2026-10-23 12:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  33. 2026-10-22 12:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  35. 2026-10-21 11:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  37. 2026-10-20 11:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  39. 2026-10-19 11:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  41. 2026-10-18 03:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  43. 2026-10-17 07:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  45. 2026-10-16 07:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  47. 2026-10-15 06:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  49. 2026-10-14 02:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  51. 2026-10-12 22:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  53. 2026-10-12 16:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-11 19:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-11 16:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-11 14:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  58. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  59. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  60. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  61. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  62. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  63. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  64. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  65. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  66. 2026-10-03 14:09 UTCOSV refresh
  67. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  68. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  69. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  70. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  71. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  72. 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  73. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  74. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  75. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-47407?
CVE-2026-47407 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 29, 2026. PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 0.1.4, the Platform server exposes resources under /api/v1/workspaces/{workspace_id}/... and protects them with a require_workspace_member(workspace_id) FastAPI dependency. The dependency only…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-47407 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-47407 was published on May 29, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 24, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-47407 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-47407 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (23rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-47407?
CVE-2026-47407 has a CVSS base score of 9.4 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-47407?
A fix for CVE-2026-47407 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-47407 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-47407

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-47407?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.