CVE-2026-47058

HIGHPre-NVD 7.47.4
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.4 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-22. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.4; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-46544 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 7.4Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Vulnerability in Oracle Java SE (component: Scripting). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 8u491, 8u491-perf and 11.0.31. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Java SE. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Java SE accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Java SE accessible data. Note: This vulnerability can be exploited by using APIs in the specified Component, e.g., through a web service which supplies data to the APIs. This vulnerability also applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).

CVSS v3
7.4
EG Score
7.4HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
33
EG Risk 33/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity74% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.4 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
33rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.4): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.4 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.4 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-07). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 21, 2026

Last Modified

October 24, 2026

References (1)

Patch Availability(10)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuopenjdk-8-source (8u502-ga~us1-0ubuntu1~20.04) @ focal2026-10-24ubuntu
ubuntuopenjdk-11-source (11.0.32+9-1ubuntu1~18.04) @ bionic2026-10-24ubuntu
redhatjava-1.8.0-ibm-1:1.8.0.8.70-1.el8_102026-08-10redhat
redhatjava-11-openjdk-windows2026-07-23redhat
redhatjava-11-openjdk-1:11.0.32.0.9-1.el92026-07-23redhat
redhatjava-11-openjdk-portable2026-07-23redhat
redhatjava-1.8.0-openjdk-portable2026-07-23redhat
redhatjava-1.8.0-openjdk-windows2026-07-23redhat
redhatjava-1.8.0-openjdk-1:1.8.0.502.b07-1.1.el7_92026-07-23redhat
redhatjava-1.8.0-openjdk-1:1.8.0.502.b07-1.1.el92026-07-23redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openjdk11—
  • every version up to 11.0.32_p9-r0: fixed in 11.0.32_p9-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openjdk11—
  • every version up to 11.0.32_p9-r0: fixed in 11.0.32_p9-r0
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openjdk-1111.0.12+7-2 ... 11.0.32~8ea-1 (72 versions)
  • every version up to 11.0.32+9-2~deb11u1: fixed in 11.0.32+9-2~deb11u1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(2)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 371 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 271 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  4. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  5. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  6. 2026-11-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  7. 2026-11-08 11:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-08 11:10 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-11-08 11:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  10. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  11. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  12. 2026-11-05 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  13. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  14. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  15. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  16. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  17. 2026-11-01 03:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-01 03:18 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-01 03:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  20. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  24. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-25 14:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-10-24 19:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-10-24 19:26 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-24 19:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  6. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  7. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  8. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  9. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  10. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  11. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  12. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  13. 2026-10-18 03:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  15. 2026-10-17 12:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-17 12:58 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-17 12:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  18. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  19. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  20. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  21. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  22. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  23. 2026-10-12 16:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-11 19:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-11 16:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-11 14:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  28. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  29. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  30. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  31. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  32. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  33. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  34. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  35. 2026-10-04 13:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-04 13:58 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-04 13:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  38. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  39. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  40. 2026-10-01 07:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-01 07:20 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-01 07:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  43. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  44. 2026-09-28 06:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-09-28 06:00 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-28 06:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  47. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  48. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  49. 2026-09-26 00:27 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  50. 2026-09-24 03:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-09-24 03:18 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-24 03:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  53. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  54. 2026-09-23 01:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-09-23 01:00 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-09-23 01:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  57. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  58. 2026-09-20 05:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-09-20 05:51 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-09-20 05:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  61. 2026-09-19 00:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-09-19 00:16 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-09-19 00:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  64. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  65. 2026-09-18 03:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-09-18 03:45 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-18 03:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  68. 2026-09-17 05:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-09-17 05:00 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-09-17 05:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  71. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile
  72. 2026-09-16 12:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-09-16 12:32 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-09-16 12:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j75p-jh2f-6h9p · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  75. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 30th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-47058?
CVE-2026-47058 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 21, 2026. Vulnerability in Oracle Java SE (component: Scripting). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 8u491, 8u491-perf and 11.0.31. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Java SE. Successful…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-47058 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-47058 was published on July 21, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 24, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-47058 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-47058 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (33rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-47058?
CVE-2026-47058 has a CVSS base score of 7.4 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-47058?
A fix for CVE-2026-47058 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-47058 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-47058

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-47058?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.