CVE-2026-46066

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-27. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ceph: fix num_ops off-by-one when crypto allocation fails

move_dirty_folio_in_page_array() may fail if the file is encrypted, the dirty folio is not the first in the batch, and it fails to allocate a bounce buffer to hold the ciphertext. When that happens, ceph_process_folio_batch() simply redirties the folio and flushes the current batch -- it can retry that folio in a future batch.

However, if this failed folio is not contiguous with the last folio that did make it into the batch, then ceph_process_folio_batch() has already incremented ceph_wbc->num_ops; because it doesn't follow through and add the discontiguous folio to the array, ceph_submit_write() -- which expects that ceph_wbc->num_ops accurately reflects the number of contiguous ranges (and therefore the required number of "write extent" ops) in the writeback -- will panic the kernel:

BUG_ON(ceph_wbc->op_idx + 1 != req->r_num_ops);

This issue can be reproduced on affected kernels by writing to fscrypt-enabled CephFS file(s) with a 4KiB-written/4KiB-skipped/repeat pattern (total filesize should not matter) and gradually increasing the system's memory pressure until a bounce buffer allocation fails.

Fix this crash by decrementing ceph_wbc->num_ops back to the correct value when move_dirty_folio_in_page_array() fails, but the folio already started counting a new (i.e. still-empty) extent.

The defect corrected by this patch has existed since 2022 (see first Fixes:), but another bug blocked multi-folio encrypted writeback until recently (see second Fixes:). The second commit made it into 6.18.16, 6.19.6, and 7.0-rc1, unmasking the panic in those versions. This patch therefore fixes a regression (panic) introduced by cac190c7674f.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 27, 2026

Last Modified

June 24, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jun 24, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

ceph: fix num_ops off-by-one when crypto allocation fails - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ba12c1e578890f6337a415b7dedf476c6d455105
generic

ceph: fix num_ops off-by-one when crypto allocation fails - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a0d9555bf9eaeba34fe6b6bb86f442fe08ba3842
generic

ceph: fix num_ops off-by-one when crypto allocation fails - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6200f41d6fcf2ac7e24866431e381cbc914560e4

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-46066(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(7)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (174 versions)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.4-1~bpo13+1 (134 versions)7.0.4-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(6)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 211 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-14 07:56 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-14 07:56 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-14 07:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-13 03:39 UTCOSV refresh
  10. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-25 05:23 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-25 05:23 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-08-25 05:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-23 15:07 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-23 15:07 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-23 15:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-21 20:39 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-21 20:39 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-21 20:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-20 11:23 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-20 11:23 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-20 11:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-17 09:17 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-17 09:17 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-17 09:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-16 02:50 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-16 02:50 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-16 02:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-15 01:11 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-15 01:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-14 01:28 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-08-14 01:28 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-14 01:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-08-12 23:40 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-08-12 23:40 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-12 23:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-08-11 23:56 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-11 23:56 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-11 23:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-08-11 00:13 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-08-11 00:13 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-11 00:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-08-09 21:09 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-08-09 21:09 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-08-09 21:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-08-08 21:26 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-08 21:26 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-08 21:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-08-07 20:21 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-07 20:21 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-07 20:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-06 20:37 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-08-06 20:37 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-08-06 20:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-08-05 20:53 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-08-05 20:53 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-05 20:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-08-04 10:39 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-08-03 16:27 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-03 16:27 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-03 16:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-08-02 15:05 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-02 15:05 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-02 15:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-08-01 15:21 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-08-01 15:21 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-08-01 15:21 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-46066?
CVE-2026-46066 is a medium vulnerability published on May 27, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ceph: fix num_ops off-by-one when crypto allocation fails movedirtyfolioinpage_array() may fail if the file is encrypted, the dirty folio is not the first in the batch, and it fails to allocate a bounce buffer to hold the…
When was CVE-2026-46066 disclosed?
CVE-2026-46066 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 27, 2026, with the most recent update on June 24, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-46066 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-46066 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-46066?
CVE-2026-46066 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-46066?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-46066, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-46066

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-46066?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.