CVE-2026-44266

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-11-03. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-116110 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-7w38-ggh5-v542 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.0%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Elo is a purely functional expression language for no-code tools. Prior to 1.0.1, the Ruby backend in src/compilers/ruby.ts embeds attacker-controlled text in Ruby double-quoted strings without escaping #, so Ruby interpolation forms in the string-literal emitter or the labelled subtype-constraint branch become executable Ruby. The affected entry points include the /try playground with the Ruby target, bin/eloc -t ruby -x, and defaultFormats.elo.parse() followed by Ruby emission. A failing labelled subtype constraint evaluates its message, while an ordinary string literal is evaluated when the compiled Ruby runs, allowing Ruby code and shell command execution through backticks. JavaScript, Python, and SQL emission are not affected by this Ruby-specific path. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.1.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
75
EG Risk 75/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
1.0%
EPSS %ILE
63rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
1.0% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

November 3, 2026

Last Modified

November 12, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Nov 7, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)🟡 PoC Available

Remote Code Execution in Elo Ruby backend via unescaped `#{...}` interpolation in emitted string literals and subtype-constraint labels · Advisory · enspirit/elo · GitHub

https://github.com/enspirit/elo/security/advisories/GHSA-7w38-ggh5-v542
GitHub commit

commit d2a89a8db76a (enspirit/elo)

Fix landed in enspirit/elo commit d2a89a8db76a — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/enspirit/elo/commit/d2a89a8db76a244eb740687524a7e8529b7554b5
GitHub commit

commit 51b869963fbe (enspirit/elo)

Fix landed in enspirit/elo commit 51b869963fbe — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/enspirit/elo/commit/51b869963fbe445c18328714a7ccfbd76b21ba38

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-44266(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
npm@enspirit/elo @ 1.0.1 (fixes <= 1.0.0)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
@enspirit/elo—
  • every version up to 1.0.1: fixed in 1.0.1
—

Weakness Classification(3)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 25× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-12 22:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-12 22:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7w38-ggh5-v542 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  4. 2026-11-12 02:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 02:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7w38-ggh5-v542 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-11-11 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  7. 2026-11-11 02:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-11 02:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7w38-ggh5-v542 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-11-10 19:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-10 19:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7w38-ggh5-v542 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  12. 2026-11-09 19:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-09 19:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7w38-ggh5-v542 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  14. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  15. 2026-11-08 19:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-08 19:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7w38-ggh5-v542 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-11-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  18. 2026-11-07 19:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-07 19:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7w38-ggh5-v542 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  21. 2026-11-06 19:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-06 19:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7w38-ggh5-v542 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  24. 2026-11-06 08:55 UTCOSV refresh
  25. 2026-11-05 20:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 12 more
  1. 2026-11-05 20:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7w38-ggh5-v542 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  2. 2026-11-05 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  3. 2026-11-04 20:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-04 20:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7w38-ggh5-v542 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  5. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  6. 2026-11-03 20:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7w38-ggh5-v542 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-11-03 19:03 UTCENISA EUVD ID recordedEUVD-2026-116110 · Source: ENISA EUVD
  8. 2026-11-03 18:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-03 18:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7w38-ggh5-v542 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-11-03 17:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 9.8 CRITICAL
  11. 2026-11-03 17:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7w38-ggh5-v542 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-03 17:56 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-44266?
CVE-2026-44266 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on November 3, 2026. Elo is a purely functional expression language for no-code tools. Prior to 1.0.1, the Ruby backend in src/compilers/ruby.ts embeds attacker-controlled text in Ruby double-quoted strings without escaping #, so Ruby interpolation forms in the string-literal emitter or the labelled subtype-constraint…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-44266 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-44266 was published on November 3, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 12, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-44266 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-44266 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (63rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-44266?
CVE-2026-44266 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-44266?
A fix for CVE-2026-44266 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-44266 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-44266

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-44266?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.