CVE-2026-43947

HIGHPre-NVD 8.98.9
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This high-severity CVE scores 8.9 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.9% (60th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-46522 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-rg3m-cfq7-g6h6 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.9EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.9%CVSS: 8.9Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. Version 1.3.0 has an unauthenticated Remote Code Execution vulnerability when secureEnabled is set to true. The POST /api/runscript endpoint checks authorization against the stored script's permission by ID, but when test: true is set in the request, it compiles and executes attacker-supplied code instead of the stored script's code. An unauthenticated attacker who knows a valid script ID and name may execute arbitrary code via test mode if at least one server-side script exists and is accessible without restrictive permissions. Script IDs and names can be obtained through the unauthenticated information disclosure in GET /api/project (reported separately). The only prerequisite is that at least one server-side script exists in the project. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

CVSS
8.9
EG Score
8.9HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
71
EG Risk 71/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity89% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.9%
EPSS %ILE
60th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.9 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.9 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source
EG Likelihood
0.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-09). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 26, 2026

Last Modified

October 24, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Jul 22, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github_pr, github_release, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Script Test Mode Authorization Bypass · Advisory · frangoteam/FUXA · GitHub

https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/security/advisories/GHSA-rg3m-cfq7-g6h6
GitHub release Patch Available

v1.3.1

Patch available: frangoteam/FUXA v1.3.1

https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/releases/tag/v1.3.1
GitHub pull request Patch Available

Security fixes

Patch available: frangoteam/FUXA v1.3.1 (PR #2260 merged 2026-03-19)

https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/pull/2260
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 78534da61a91 (frangoteam/FUXA)

Patch available: frangoteam/FUXA v1.3.1 (contains commit 78534da61a91)

https://github.com/frangoteam/FUXA/commit/78534da61a91613712b44bb63c8d7da8c5df5ca4

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-43947(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
npmfuxa-server @ 1.3.1 (fixes = 1.3.0)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
fuxa-server1.3.0
  • 1.3.0 up to 1.3.1: fixed in 1.3.1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 33× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 145 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 45 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  3. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  4. 2026-11-10 12:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-10 12:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rg3m-cfq7-g6h6 · GitHub severity HIGH
  6. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  7. 2026-11-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  8. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  9. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  10. 2026-11-05 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  11. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  12. 2026-11-03 17:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-03 17:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rg3m-cfq7-g6h6 · GitHub severity HIGH
  14. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  15. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  16. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  17. 2026-11-01 07:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-rg3m-cfq7-g6h6 · GitHub severity HIGH
  18. 2026-11-01 07:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  20. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  21. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  22. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  23. 2026-10-27 21:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  25. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  2. 2026-10-25 14:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-10-24 19:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  5. 2026-10-24 08:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  7. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  8. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  9. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  10. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  11. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  12. 2026-10-18 03:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  14. 2026-10-17 14:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  16. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  17. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  18. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  19. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  20. 2026-10-12 16:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-11 19:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-11 17:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-11 14:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  25. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  26. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  27. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  28. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  29. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  30. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  31. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  32. 2026-10-03 19:51 UTCOSV refresh
  33. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  34. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  35. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  36. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  37. 2026-09-26 15:58 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  38. 2026-09-23 17:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  39. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  40. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  41. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  42. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  43. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  44. 2026-09-14 09:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  46. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  47. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  48. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  49. 2026-09-11 01:23 UTCOSV refresh
  50. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  51. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  52. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  53. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  54. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  55. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  56. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  57. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  58. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  59. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 56th percentile
  60. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  61. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  62. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  63. 2026-08-23 15:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  65. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  66. 2026-08-21 21:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  68. 2026-08-20 17:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  70. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
  71. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
  72. 2026-08-16 16:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile
  74. 2026-08-16 03:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 48th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-43947?
CVE-2026-43947 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 26, 2026. FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. Version 1.3.0 has an unauthenticated Remote Code Execution vulnerability when secureEnabled is set to true. The POST /api/runscript endpoint checks authorization against the stored script's permission by ID, but when test:…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-43947 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-43947 was published on May 26, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 24, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-43947 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-43947 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.9% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (60th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43947?
CVE-2026-43947 has a CVSS base score of 8.9 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-43947?
A fix for CVE-2026-43947 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-43947 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-43947

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-43947?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.