CVE-2026-43244

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-05-06. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error

Syzkaller reported a warning in kcm_write_msgs() when processing a message with a zero-fragment skb in the frag_list.

When kcm_sendmsg() fills MAX_SKB_FRAGS fragments in the current skb, it allocates a new skb (tskb) and links it into the frag_list before copying data. If the copy subsequently fails (e.g. -EFAULT from user memory), tskb remains in the frag_list with zero fragments:

head skb (msg being assembled, NOT yet in sk_write_queue) +-----------+ | frags[17] | (MAX_SKB_FRAGS, all filled with data) | frag_list-+--> tskb +-----------+ +----------+ | frags[0] | (empty! copy failed before filling) +----------+

For SOCK_SEQPACKET with partial data already copied, the error path saves this message via partial_message for later completion. For SOCK_SEQPACKET, sock_write_iter() automatically sets MSG_EOR, so a subsequent zero-length write(fd, NULL, 0) completes the message and queues it to sk_write_queue. kcm_write_msgs() then walks the frag_list and hits:

WARN_ON(!skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags)

TCP has a similar pattern where skbs are enqueued before data copy and cleaned up on failure via tcp_remove_empty_skb(). KCM was missing the equivalent cleanup.

Fix this by tracking the predecessor skb (frag_prev) when allocating a new frag_list entry. On error, if the tail skb has zero frags, use frag_prev to unlink and free it in O(1) without walking the singly-linked frag_list. frag_prev is safe to dereference because the entire message chain is only held locally (or in kcm->seq_skb) and is not added to sk_write_queue until MSG_EOR, so the send path cannot free it underneath us.

Also change the WARN_ON to WARN_ON_ONCE to avoid flooding the log if the condition is somehow hit repeatedly.

There are currently no KCM selftests in the kernel tree; a simple reproducer is available at [1].

[1] https://gist.github.com/mrpre/a94d431c757e8d6f168f4dd1a3749daa

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

May 6, 2026

Last Modified

May 11, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated May 11, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ca220141fa8ebae09765a242076b2b77338106b0
generic

kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b1e3edf688a88c1a3ac41657055d9c136a08cd25
generic

kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9ea3671d70ee07480d80bebe86696397c4e99fb7
generic

kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7af58f76e4b404a74c836881a845e6652db8a09f

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-43244(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(13)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 7.2~rc5-1~exp1 (496 versions)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (350 versions)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.85-1~bpo12+1 (17 versions)6.12.85-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.19~rc8-1~exp1 (116 versions)6.19.6-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(12)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 4× in last 7d / 25× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 181 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-20 20:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-12 15:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-11 16:23 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-10 09:34 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-08 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-23 19:54 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-23 19:54 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-23 19:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-17 12:54 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-17 12:54 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-17 12:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-16 04:52 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-16 04:52 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-16 04:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-14 03:26 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-14 03:26 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-08-14 03:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-12 17:00 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-12 17:00 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-12 17:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-11 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-11 10:59 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-11 10:59 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-11 10:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-10 08:33 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-10 08:33 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-10 08:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-09 06:20 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-09 06:20 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-09 06:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-08 04:07 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-08 04:07 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-08 04:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-07 01:54 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-08-07 01:54 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-07 01:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-06 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-08-05 22:21 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-08-05 22:21 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-05 22:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-08-04 15:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-04 10:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-08-03 19:52 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-08-03 19:52 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-03 19:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-03 10:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-08-02 05:07 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-08-02 05:07 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-08-02 05:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-08-02 02:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-08-01 04:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-07-30 16:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-07-30 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-07-28 15:36 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-07-23 03:14 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-07-19 17:18 UTCOSV refresh
  71. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  75. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-43244?
CVE-2026-43244 is a medium vulnerability published on May 6, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: kcm: fix zero-frag skb in frag_list on partial sendmsg error Syzkaller reported a warning in kcmwritemsgs() when processing a message with a zero-fragment skb in the frag_list. When kcmsendmsg() fills MAXSKB_FRAGS fragments in the…
When was CVE-2026-43244 disclosed?
CVE-2026-43244 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on May 6, 2026, with the most recent update on May 11, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-43244 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-43244 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-43244?
CVE-2026-43244 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-43244?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-43244, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-43244

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-43244?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.