A flaw was found in sequoia-openpgp. The library incorrectly infers key flags for older certificates when a key flags subpacket is missing, leading to a discrepancy in how key capabilities are viewed. This key flag confusion allows an attacker to bypass the back-signature check. Consequently, an attacker can illegitimately bind an arbitrary subkey to their own certificate and forge signatures, completely compromising cryptographic integrity.
CVE-2026-42784
Score 7.4 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-16. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.4; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 7.4
- EG Score
- 7.4(high)
- EG Risk
- 33(Track)EG Risk 33/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity74% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 5%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 16, 2026
Last Modified
September 18, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-42784(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 20× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-19 16:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 16:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-19 05:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 05:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 18:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 18:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 18:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 18:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 16:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 05:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 05:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 18:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 06:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 19:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 19:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 17:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 17:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 17:04 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-42784?
When was CVE-2026-42784 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-42784 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-42784?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-42784?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-42784
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-42784?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.