CVE-2026-42013

HIGHPre-NVD 8.28.2
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.2 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-05-27. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.2; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — Patch released this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-32011 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.2EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 8.2Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A flaw was found in gnutls. When validating certificates, an oversized Subject Alternative Name (SAN) could cause the validation process to incorrectly fall back to checking the Common Name (CN) field. This could allow a remote attacker to bypass proper certificate validation, potentially leading to spoofing or man-in-the-middle attacks.

CVSS v3
8.2
EG Score
8.2HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
52
EG Risk 52/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity82% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.2 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
37th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.2): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.2 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.2 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-10). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 26, 2026

Last Modified

November 11, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated May 28, 2026
Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Red Hat

2467448 – (CVE-2026-42013) CVE-2026-42013 gnutls: gnutls: Certificate validation bypass due to oversized Subject Alternative Name

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2467448
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

cve-details

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42013
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:20611

Patch Availability(30)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:413.92.202611041925-02026-11-11redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:414.92.202611040941-02026-11-09redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:4.22.9.8.202610241758-02026-10-27redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:4.20.9.6.202610242033-02026-10-27redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:4.21.9.6.202610241345-02026-10-27redhat
redhatcert-manager/cert-manager-operator-bundle:17919662592026-10-14redhat
redhatcert-manager/cert-manager-operator-bundle:17919704842026-10-14redhat
redhatcert-manager/cert-manager-operator-rhel9:17890290762026-10-13redhat
redhatcert-manager/cert-manager-istio-csr-rhel9:17914597592026-10-13redhat
redhatcert-manager/jetstack-cert-manager-rhel9:17914597112026-10-13redhat
redhatcert-manager/jetstack-cert-manager-rhel9:17913710692026-10-13redhat
redhatcert-manager/cert-manager-operator-rhel9:17917882872026-10-13redhat
redhatrhai/base-image-neuron-rhel9:17907035422026-10-01redhat
redhatcert-manager/cert-manager-trust-manager-rhel9:17905985932026-09-28redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:417.94.202608250221-02026-09-03redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-8:412.86.202608241157-02026-09-03redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:416.94.202608150307-02026-08-31redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:418.94.202608142238-02026-08-26redhat
redhatrhui5/rhua-tp-rhel9:17872412602026-08-24redhat
redhatgnutls-0:3.3.29-9.el7_9.22026-07-22redhat
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:4.19.9.6.202607151909-02026-07-22redhat
redhatgnutls-0:3.7.6-21.el9_2.72026-07-20redhat
redhatlibtasn1-0:4.13-3.el8_4.12026-06-29redhat
redhatgnutls-0:3.8.3-4.el9_4.62026-06-29redhat
redhatlibtasn1-0:4.13-4.el8_8.12026-06-29redhat
redhatlibtasn1-0:4.13-3.el8_6.22026-06-29redhat
redhatgnutls-0:3.8.3-6.el9_6.42026-06-25redhat
redhatdiscovery/discovery-ui-rhel9:17821669522026-06-24redhat
redhatrhui5/rhua-rhel9:17815257392026-06-16redhat
redhatgnutls-0:3.8.9-9.el10_0.192026-06-16redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(9 across 9 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.20(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gnutls—
  • every version up to 3.8.13-r0: fixed in 3.8.13-r0
—
Alpine:v3.21(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gnutls—
  • every version up to 3.8.13-r0: fixed in 3.8.13-r0
—
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gnutls—
  • every version up to 3.8.13-r0: fixed in 3.8.13-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gnutls—
  • every version up to 3.8.13-r0: fixed in 3.8.13-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gnutls—
  • every version up to 3.8.13-r0: fixed in 3.8.13-r0
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gnutls283.7.1-5 ... 3.7.1-5+deb11u9 (10 versions)
  • every version up to 3.7.1-5+deb11u10: fixed in 3.7.1-5+deb11u10
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gnutls283.7.9-2 ... 3.7.9-2+deb12u6 (7 versions)
  • every version up to 3.7.9-2+deb12u7: fixed in 3.7.9-2+deb12u7
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gnutls283.8.9-3, 3.8.9-3+deb13u1, 3.8.9-3+deb13u2, 3.8.9-3+deb13u3
  • every version up to 3.8.9-3+deb13u4: fixed in 3.8.9-3+deb13u4
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gnutls283.8.10-1 ... 3.8.9-3 (11 versions)
  • every version up to 3.8.13-1: fixed in 3.8.13-1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(16)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 60× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 479 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 379 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 13:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-11 13:28 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-11-11 13:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  6. 2026-11-11 12:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-11 12:49 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-11 12:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  9. 2026-11-11 07:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-11 07:27 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-11 07:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  12. 2026-11-11 06:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-11 06:29 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-11 06:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  15. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  16. 2026-11-09 18:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-09 18:27 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-09 18:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  19. 2026-11-09 17:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-09 17:20 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-11-09 17:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  22. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  23. 2026-11-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  24. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  25. 2026-11-06 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 21:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-05 21:28 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-05 21:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  4. 2026-11-05 20:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-05 20:43 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-05 20:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  7. 2026-11-05 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  8. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  9. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  10. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  11. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  12. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  13. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  14. 2026-10-30 08:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-30 08:26 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-30 08:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  17. 2026-10-30 07:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-30 07:36 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-30 07:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  20. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  21. 2026-10-29 06:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-29 06:26 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-29 06:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  24. 2026-10-29 05:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-29 05:58 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-29 05:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  27. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  28. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  29. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  30. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 36th percentile
  31. 2026-10-25 14:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  33. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  34. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  35. 2026-10-22 01:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-22 01:19 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-22 01:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  38. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 46th percentile
  39. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  40. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  41. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  42. 2026-10-18 03:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  44. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  45. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  46. 2026-10-14 20:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-14 20:33 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-14 20:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  49. 2026-10-14 19:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-14 19:38 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-14 19:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  52. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  53. 2026-10-14 04:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-14 04:28 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-14 04:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  56. 2026-10-14 03:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-14 03:36 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-14 03:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  59. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  60. 2026-10-13 01:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-13 01:27 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-13 01:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  63. 2026-10-13 00:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-13 00:54 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-13 00:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  66. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  67. 2026-10-12 16:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-10-11 19:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-11 17:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-11 14:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  72. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 45th percentile
  73. 2026-10-10 00:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-10-10 00:18 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-10-10 00:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pw7-g86g-76q7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-42013?
CVE-2026-42013 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 26, 2026. A flaw was found in gnutls. When validating certificates, an oversized Subject Alternative Name (SAN) could cause the validation process to incorrectly fall back to checking the Common Name (CN) field. This could allow a remote attacker to bypass proper certificate validation, potentially leading…
When was CVE-2026-42013 made public?
CVE-2026-42013 was made public on April 29, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Red Hat, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on May 26, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 11, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-42013 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-42013 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (37th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-42013?
CVE-2026-42013 has a CVSS base score of 8.2 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-42013?
A fix for CVE-2026-42013 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-42013 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-42013

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-42013?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.