CVE-2026-41179

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-04-22. NVD baseline CVSS 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-25144 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q (GitHub Security Advisories) · GO-2026-5466 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 8.6%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Starting in version 1.48.0 and prior to version 1.73.5, the RC endpoint operations/fsinfo is exposed without AuthRequired: true and accepts attacker-controlled fs input. Because rc.GetFs(...) supports inline backend definitions, an unauthenticated attacker can instantiate an attacker-controlled backend on demand. For the WebDAV backend, bearer_token_command is executed during backend initialization, making single-request unauthenticated local command execution possible on reachable RC deployments without global HTTP authentication. Version 1.73.5 patches the issue.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
75
EG Risk 75/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
8.6%
EPSS %ILE
95th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
8.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

April 23, 2026

Last Modified

November 11, 2026

Advisory Details (9)

Auto-updated Oct 31, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github_release, github, redhat.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)🟡 PoC Available

Unauthenticated RC operations/fsinfo allows attacker-controlled backend instantiation and local command execution via WebDAV bearer_token_command · Advisory · rclone/rclone · GitHub

https://github.com/rclone/rclone/security/advisories/GHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

2460988 – (CVE-2026-41179) CVE-2026-41179 github.com/rclone/rclone: Rclone: Unauthenticated local command execution via exposed RC endpoint

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2460988
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

CVE-2026-41179 - Red Hat Customer Portal

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-41179
GitHub release Patch Available

rclone v1.73.5

Patch available: rclone/rclone v1.73.5

https://github.com/rclone/rclone/releases/tag/v1.73.5
GitHub commit

commit 2a9e952b38e0 (rclone/rclone)

Fix landed in rclone/rclone commit 2a9e952b38e0 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/rclone/rclone/commit/2a9e952b38e03a96bf40c9eb6e8e22199865ee3b
Web page

rclone/fs/rc/cache.go at bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82 · rclone/rclone · GitHub

https://github.com/rclone/rclone/blob/bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82/fs/rc/cache.go
Web page

rclone/fs/operations/rc.go at bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82 · rclone/rclone · GitHub

https://github.com/rclone/rclone/blob/bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82/fs/operations/rc.go
Web page

rclone/backend/webdav/webdav.go at bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82 · rclone/rclone · GitHub

https://github.com/rclone/rclone/blob/bf55d5e6d37fd86164a87782191f9e1ffcaafa82/backend/webdav/webdav.go

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-41179(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubunturclone (1.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu2.1) @ questing2026-11-11ubuntu
gogithub.com/rclone/rclone @ 1.73.5 (fixes >= 1.48.0, <= 1.73.4)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Go(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/ncw/rclone—
  • 1.48.0 on: no fix on record
—
github.com/rclone/rclone—
  • 1.48.0 up to 1.73.5: fixed in 1.73.5
  • 1.49.0 up to 1.73.5: fixed in 1.73.5
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
rclone—
  • 1.48.0 up to 1.73.5-r0: fixed in 1.73.5-r0
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
rclone1.60.1+dfsg-2 ... 1.69.3+dfsg-3 (8 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
rclone1.60.1+dfsg-4 ... 1.69.3+dfsg-3 (6 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(3)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(1)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 60× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 363 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 263 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 95th percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 00:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-13 00:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 95th percentile
  5. 2026-11-11 23:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-11 23:28 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-11 23:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-11-11 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 95th percentile
  9. 2026-11-11 05:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-11 05:01 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-11 05:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 95th percentile
  13. 2026-11-10 04:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-10 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 95th percentile
  16. 2026-11-09 03:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-09 03:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-11-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 95th percentile
  19. 2026-11-08 02:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-08 02:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 95th percentile
  22. 2026-11-07 01:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-07 01:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-11-06 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 95th percentile
  25. 2026-11-06 07:55 UTCOSV refresh
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-06 01:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-06 01:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-05 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 95th percentile
  4. 2026-11-05 00:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-05 00:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 95th percentile
  7. 2026-11-03 23:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-03 23:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 95th percentile
  10. 2026-11-02 22:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-02 22:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-01 22:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-01 22:13 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-01 22:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 95th percentile
  16. 2026-11-01 07:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jfwf-28xr-xw6q · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-11-01 07:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-31 21:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-31 21:26 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 95th percentile
  21. 2026-10-30 20:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-30 20:42 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 95th percentile
  24. 2026-10-29 19:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-29 19:58 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 95th percentile
  27. 2026-10-28 19:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-28 19:13 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 95th percentile
  30. 2026-10-27 18:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-27 18:24 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 95th percentile
  33. 2026-10-26 17:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 95th percentile
  35. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 8.6% · 95th percentile
  36. 2026-10-25 16:22 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-25 14:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
  39. 2026-10-24 15:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-24 15:37 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
  42. 2026-10-23 14:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-23 14:52 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
  45. 2026-10-22 14:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
  47. 2026-10-21 13:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-21 13:18 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
  50. 2026-10-20 12:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
  52. 2026-10-19 11:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-19 11:35 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
  55. 2026-10-18 09:22 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-18 03:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
  58. 2026-10-17 08:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-17 08:22 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
  61. 2026-10-16 07:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-10-16 07:38 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
  64. 2026-10-15 06:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-10-15 06:32 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
  67. 2026-10-14 02:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
  69. 2026-10-12 22:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-12 22:32 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 5.3% · 92nd percentile
  72. 2026-10-12 16:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-11 19:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-10-11 17:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-11 14:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Public detection templates

(1 reference)

A public Nuclei detection template is referenced for this CVE. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code.

  • Nucleihttp/cves/2026/CVE-2026-41179.yaml
    Published Apr 23, 2026

    RClone RC - Command Injection

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-41179?
CVE-2026-41179 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on April 23, 2026. Rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Starting in version 1.48.0 and prior to version 1.73.5, the RC endpoint operations/fsinfo is exposed without AuthRequired: true and accepts attacker-controlled fs input. Because…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-41179 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-41179 was published on April 23, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 11, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-41179 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-41179 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 8.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (95th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-41179?
CVE-2026-41179 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-41179?
A fix for CVE-2026-41179 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-41179 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-41179

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-41179?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.