CVE-2026-39831

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.19.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-06-25. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 9.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory

Also known asEUVD-2026-31395 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-89gr-r52h-f8rx (GitHub Security Advisories) · GO-2026-5019 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

The Verify() method for FIDO/U2F security key types ([email protected], [email protected]) did not check the User Presence flag. Signatures generated without physical touch were accepted, allowing unattended use of a hardware security key. To restore the previous behavior, return a "no-touch-required" extension in Permissions.Extensions from PublicKeyCallback.

CVSS v3
9.1
EG Score
9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
56
EG Risk 56/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity91% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.5% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
41st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.1 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 22, 2026

Last Modified

July 23, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

GO-2026-5019 - Go Packages

https://pkg.go.dev/vuln/GO-2026-5019
Web page

x/crypto/ssh: bypass of FIDO/U2F security keys physical interaction · Issue #79566 · golang/go · GitHub

https://go.dev/issue/79566

Patch Availability(31)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder:17929743682026-10-27redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder:17918374292026-10-22redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder:17918738062026-10-22redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder-rhel9:17908300362026-10-15redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder-rhel9:17913731292026-10-15redhat
redhatcert-manager/jetstack-cert-manager-rhel9:17913710692026-10-13redhat
redhatcert-manager/cert-manager-operator-rhel9:17917882872026-10-13redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder-rhel9:17906331932026-10-08redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder-rhel9:17906101592026-10-07redhat
redhatcompliance/openshift-security-profiles-rhel8-operator:17906230302026-10-06redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-data-science-pipelines-argo-workflowcontroller-rhel9:17901301732026-09-30redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder-rhel9:17898853242026-09-29redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-docker-builder-rhel9:17899877772026-09-29redhat
redhatmulticluster-engine/azure-service-operator-rhel9:17901335432026-09-28redhat
redhatopenshift-logging/cluster-logging-rhel9-operator:17896591662026-09-23redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-powervs-block-csi-driver-rhel9:17894654142026-09-22redhat
redhatquay/quay-rhel8:17885938432026-09-22redhat
redhatrhem/flightctl-worker-rhel10:17894860712026-09-16redhat
redhatflightctl-0:1.1.4-1.el9em2026-09-16redhat
redhatrhem/flightctl-worker-rhel9:17894868292026-09-16redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-powervs-block-csi-driver-rhel9:17889289032026-09-15redhat
redhatpodman-5:5.4.0-22.el9_6.52026-09-14redhat
redhatopenshift-logging/cluster-logging-rhel9-operator:17884395052026-09-10redhat
redhatoadp/oadp-velero-rhel9:17888604612026-09-09redhat
redhatdevspaces/traefik-rhel9:17877567992026-09-01redhat
redhatcluster-observability-operator/cluster-observability-rhel9-operator:17875936372026-08-31redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-trainer-rhel9:17870890492026-08-27redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-ovn-kubernetes-rhel9:17869553162026-08-25redhat
redhatmulticluster-engine/hypershift-addon-rhel9-operator:17872640682026-08-25redhat
redhatmulticluster-engine/hypershift-addon-rhel9-operator:17864759642026-08-25redhat
gogolang.org/x/crypto @ 0.52.0 (fixes < 0.52.0)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-go.crypto1:0.0~git20201221.eec23a3-1 ... 1:0.53.0-1 (40 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-go.crypto1:0.10.0-1 ... 1:0.56.0-1 (36 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-go.crypto1:0.25.0-1 ... 1:0.56.0-1 (21 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang-go.crypto1:0.25.0-1 ... 1:0.52.0-1~bpo13+1 (16 versions)
  • every version up to 1:0.52.0-1: fixed in 1:0.52.0-1
—
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
golang.org/x/crypto—
  • every version up to 0.52.0: fixed in 0.52.0
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(25)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 71× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 377 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 277 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 12:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-13 12:12 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-13 12:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-89gr-r52h-f8rx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  5. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  6. 2026-11-12 10:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-12 10:36 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-12 10:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-89gr-r52h-f8rx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  9. 2026-11-11 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  10. 2026-11-11 09:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-11 09:04 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-11-11 09:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-89gr-r52h-f8rx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  13. 2026-11-10 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  14. 2026-11-10 07:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-10 07:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-89gr-r52h-f8rx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  16. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  17. 2026-11-09 05:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-09 05:59 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-09 05:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-89gr-r52h-f8rx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  20. 2026-11-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  21. 2026-11-08 04:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-08 04:27 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-08 04:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-89gr-r52h-f8rx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  24. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  25. 2026-11-07 02:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-07 02:53 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-11-07 02:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-89gr-r52h-f8rx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  3. 2026-11-06 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  4. 2026-11-06 07:25 UTCOSV refresh
  5. 2026-11-06 01:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-06 01:20 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-06 01:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-89gr-r52h-f8rx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  8. 2026-11-05 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  9. 2026-11-04 23:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-04 23:48 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-04 23:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-89gr-r52h-f8rx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  12. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  13. 2026-11-03 22:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-03 22:16 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-03 22:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-89gr-r52h-f8rx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  16. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  17. 2026-11-02 20:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-02 20:38 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-02 20:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-89gr-r52h-f8rx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  20. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  21. 2026-11-01 19:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-01 19:05 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-01 19:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-89gr-r52h-f8rx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  24. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  25. 2026-11-01 07:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-89gr-r52h-f8rx · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  26. 2026-11-01 07:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-31 17:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-31 17:32 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  30. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  31. 2026-10-30 16:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-30 16:00 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  34. 2026-10-29 14:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-29 14:28 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  37. 2026-10-28 12:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-28 12:55 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  40. 2026-10-27 11:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-27 11:23 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  43. 2026-10-26 09:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-26 09:51 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  46. 2026-10-25 14:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-25 08:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-25 08:20 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  50. 2026-10-24 06:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-24 06:48 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  53. 2026-10-23 05:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-23 05:14 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  56. 2026-10-22 03:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-22 03:37 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  59. 2026-10-21 02:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-21 02:05 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  62. 2026-10-20 00:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-20 00:32 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  65. 2026-10-18 22:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-18 22:59 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  68. 2026-10-18 03:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-17 21:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-17 21:27 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  72. 2026-10-16 19:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-16 19:54 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  75. 2026-10-15 17:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-39831?
CVE-2026-39831 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 22, 2026. The Verify() method for FIDO/U2F security key types ([email protected], [email protected]) did not check the User Presence flag. Signatures generated without physical touch were accepted, allowing unattended use of a hardware security key. To restore the previous behavior,…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-39831 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-39831 was published on May 22, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of July 23, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-39831 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-39831 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (41st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-39831?
CVE-2026-39831 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.1 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-39831?
A fix for CVE-2026-39831 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-39831 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-39831

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-39831?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.