CVE-2026-33634

CRITICALNVD 8.89.0
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“▲” beside the score: it is higher than NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.0 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2026-03-26), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. NVD baseline CVSS 8.8 retained for reference. The 9.0 is the floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: this CVE's impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.8 HIGH under NVD CVSS v3. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
Exploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2026-14601 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23 (GitHub Security Advisories) · GO-2026-4919 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPatch nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedEPSS PROB: 60%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Trivy is a security scanner. On March 19, 2026, a threat actor used compromised credentials to publish a malicious Trivy v0.69.4 release, force-push 76 of 77 version tags in aquasecurity/trivy-action to credential-stealing malware, and replace all 7 tags in aquasecurity/setup-trivy with malicious commits. This incident is a continuation of the supply chain attack that began in late February 2026. Following the initial disclosure on March 1, credential rotation was performed but was not atomic (not all credentials were revoked simultaneously). The attacker could have use a valid token to exfiltrate newly rotated secrets during the rotation window (which lasted a few days). This could have allowed the attacker to retain access and execute the March 19 attack. Affected components include the aquasecurity/trivy Go / Container image version 0.69.4, the aquasecurity/trivy-action GitHub Action versions 0.0.1 – 0.34.2 (76/77), and theaquasecurity/setup-trivy GitHub Action versions 0.2.0 – 0.2.6, prior to the recreation of 0.2.6 with a safe commit. Known safe versions include versions 0.69.2 and 0.69.3 of the Trivy binary, version 0.35.0 of trivy-action, and version 0.2.6 of setup-trivy. Additionally, take other mitigations to ensure the safety of secrets. If there is any possibility that a compromised version ran in one's environment, all secrets accessible to affected pipelines must be treated as exposed and rotated immediately. Check whether one's organization pulled or executed Trivy v0.69.4 from any source. Remove any affected artifacts immediately. Review all workflows using aquasecurity/trivy-action or aquasecurity/setup-trivy. Those who referenced a version tag rather than a full commit SHA should check workflow run logs from March 19–20, 2026 for signs of compromise. Look for repositories named tpcp-docs in one's GitHub organization. The presence of such a repository may indicate that the fallback exfiltration mechanism was triggered and secrets were successfully stolen. Pin GitHub Actions to full, immutable commit SHA hashes, don't use mutable version tags.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
9.0CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
80
EG Risk 80/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.
EPSS PROB
60%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is the CISA KEV floor for confirmed exploitation, not an impact rating: its impact severity (EG Severity) is CVSS 8.8 HIGH.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
60% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-11). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Attend at medium mission impactTrack at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Attend at medium and Act at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low, sooner than that at medium and as soon as possible at high mission impact.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days & forensic triage if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23 · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33634

Published

March 23, 2026

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (10)

Auto-updated Nov 10, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). Patch available. Sources: github.
Web page

KICS GitHub Action Compromised: TeamPCP Supply Chain Attack | Wiz Blog

https://www.wiz.io/blog/teampcp-attack-kics-github-action
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Malicious code in PyPI versions 4.87.1 and 4.87.2 · Advisory · team-telnyx/telnyx-python · GitHub

https://github.com/team-telnyx/telnyx-python/security/advisories/GHSA-955r-262c-33jc
Web page

advisory-database/vulns/litellm/PYSEC-2026-2.yaml at main · pypa/advisory-database · GitHub

https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/litellm/PYSEC-2026-2.yaml
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Trivy ecosystem supply chain temporarily compromised · Advisory · aquasecurity/trivy · GitHub

https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy/security/advisories/GHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23
Web page

Trivy Security incident 2026-03-19 · aquasecurity trivy · Discussion #10425 · GitHub

https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy/discussions/10425
Web page

[Security]: litellm PyPI package (v1.82.7 + v1.82.8) compromised — full timeline and status · Issue #24518 · BerriAI/litellm · GitHub

https://github.com/BerriAI/litellm/issues/24518
Web page

litellm 1.82.8 Supply Chain Attack on PyPI (March 2026)

https://futuresearch.ai/blog/litellm-pypi-supply-chain-attack
Web page

Security Update: Suspected Supply Chain Incident | liteLLM

https://docs.litellm.ai/blog/security-update-march-2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-33634(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(3)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
actionsaquasecurity/setup-trivy @ 0.2.6 (fixes < 0.2.6)—ghsa
actionsaquasecurity/trivy-action @ 0.35.0 (fixes < 0.35.0)—ghsa
gogithub.com/aquasecurity/trivy—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 2 ecosystems)
GitHub Actions(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
aquasecurity/setup-trivy—0.2.6 (one range)—
aquasecurity/trivy-action—0.35.0 (one range)—
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/aquasecurity/trivy0.69.4
  • 0.69.4 up to 0.70.0: fixed in 0.70.0
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 235 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 135 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 12:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-12 12:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  4. 2026-11-11 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  5. 2026-11-11 14:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-11 14:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  7. 2026-11-10 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  8. 2026-11-10 15:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  9. 2026-11-09 17:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-09 17:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  11. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  12. 2026-11-08 18:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-08 18:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  14. 2026-11-07 20:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-07 20:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  16. 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  17. 2026-11-06 21:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-06 21:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  19. 2026-11-06 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  20. 2026-11-06 06:25 UTCOSV refresh
  21. 2026-11-05 23:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-05 23:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  23. 2026-11-05 00:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-05 00:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  25. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-04 02:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-04 02:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  3. 2026-11-03 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  4. 2026-11-03 03:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-03 03:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  6. 2026-11-02 05:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-02 05:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  8. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  9. 2026-11-01 07:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-69fq-xp46-6x23 · GitHub severity CRITICAL
  10. 2026-11-01 07:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  12. 2026-10-31 08:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  14. 2026-10-30 10:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  16. 2026-10-29 11:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  18. 2026-10-28 13:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  20. 2026-10-27 14:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-25 17:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 60% · 99th percentile
  23. 2026-10-25 14:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-24 19:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  26. 2026-10-23 20:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  28. 2026-10-22 22:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  30. 2026-10-21 23:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  32. 2026-10-21 01:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 77th percentile
  34. 2026-10-20 02:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
  36. 2026-10-19 04:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
  38. 2026-10-18 03:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
  40. 2026-10-17 07:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
  42. 2026-10-16 08:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
  44. 2026-10-15 10:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
  46. 2026-10-14 11:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
  48. 2026-10-13 13:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
  50. 2026-10-12 14:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-11 19:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-11 17:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-11 14:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
  55. 2026-10-11 13:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-10 20:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
  58. 2026-10-09 23:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
  60. 2026-10-08 18:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
  62. 2026-10-08 02:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
  64. 2026-10-06 16:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
  66. 2026-10-05 20:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
  68. 2026-10-05 03:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
  70. 2026-10-03 18:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
  72. 2026-10-02 17:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-01 20:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.7% · 76th percentile
  75. 2026-09-30 15:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Publicly available exploits

(1 reference)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 GitHub PoC). Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • GitHub PoCugurrates/teampcp-supply-chain-attack
    Published Mar 25, 2026

    CVE-2026-33634 (CVSS 9.4) — The most impactful CI/CD supply chain attack of 2026 so far.

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2026-33634?
CVE-2026-33634 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 23, 2026. Trivy is a security scanner. On March 19, 2026, a threat actor used compromised credentials to publish a malicious Trivy v0.69.4 release, force-push 76 of 77 version tags in aquasecurity/trivy-action to credential-stealing malware, and replace all 7 tags in aquasecurity/setup-trivy with malicious…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-33634 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-33634 was published on March 23, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-33634 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2026-33634 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on March 26, 2026, affecting Aquasecurity Trivy. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. A fix is available. Apply it.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-33634?
CVE-2026-33634 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.8 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + CISA KEV + FIRST EPSS into a combined EG score of 9.0 (CRITICAL).
Which products are affected by CVE-2026-33634?
CVE-2026-33634 affects Aquasecurity Trivy. The affected packages EchelonGraph has on record, with version ranges, are listed in the Affected Packages section of this page.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-33634?
A fix for CVE-2026-33634 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-33634 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-33634

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-33634?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.