CVE-2026-32917

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-03-31. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-17371 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 2.0%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

OpenClaw before 2026.3.13 contains a remote command injection vulnerability in the iMessage attachment staging flow that allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands on configured remote hosts. The vulnerability exists because unsanitized remote attachment paths containing shell metacharacters are passed directly to the SCP remote operand without validation, enabling command execution when remote attachment staging is enabled.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
60
EG Risk 60/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation2.0% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
2.0%
EPSS %ILE
81st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
2.0% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

March 31, 2026

Last Modified

July 25, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Oct 31, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github.
Web page

OpenClaw < 2026.3.13 - Remote Command Injection via Unsanitized iMessage Attachment Paths in SCP | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openclaw-remote-command-injection-via-unsanitized-imessage-attachment-paths-in-scp
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Unsanitized iMessage attachment paths allowed SCP remote-path command injection · Advisory · openclaw/openclaw · GitHub

https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-g2f6-pwvx-r275
GitHub commit

commit a54bf71b4c0c (openclaw/openclaw)

Fix landed in openclaw/openclaw commit a54bf71b4c0c — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/a54bf71b4c0cbe554a84340b773df37ee8e959de

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openclaw—
  • every version up to 2026.3.13: fixed in 2026.3.13
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 59× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 347 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 247 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 81st percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 10:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-13 10:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 81st percentile
  5. 2026-11-12 09:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-12 09:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-11-11 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 81st percentile
  8. 2026-11-11 09:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-11 09:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-11-10 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 81st percentile
  11. 2026-11-10 08:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-10 08:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  14. 2026-11-09 07:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-09 07:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-11-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  17. 2026-11-08 06:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-08 06:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  20. 2026-11-07 05:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-07 05:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-11-06 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  23. 2026-11-06 05:55 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-11-06 04:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-11-06 04:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  2. 2026-11-05 03:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-05 03:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  5. 2026-11-04 03:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-04 03:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-11-03 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  8. 2026-11-03 02:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-03 02:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  11. 2026-11-02 01:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-02 01:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-11-01 00:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-01 00:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  16. 2026-10-30 23:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-30 23:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  19. 2026-10-29 22:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-29 22:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  22. 2026-10-28 21:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-28 21:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  25. 2026-10-27 20:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-27 20:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  28. 2026-10-26 20:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-26 20:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  30. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  31. 2026-10-25 17:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-25 17:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  33. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 2.0% · 80th percentile
  34. 2026-10-25 14:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.2% · 88th percentile
  36. 2026-10-24 16:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-24 16:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  38. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.2% · 88th percentile
  39. 2026-10-23 15:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-23 15:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  41. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.2% · 88th percentile
  42. 2026-10-22 14:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-22 14:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  44. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.2% · 88th percentile
  45. 2026-10-21 13:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-21 13:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  47. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.2% · 87th percentile
  48. 2026-10-20 12:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-20 12:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  50. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.2% · 87th percentile
  51. 2026-10-19 11:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-19 11:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  53. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.2% · 87th percentile
  54. 2026-10-18 09:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  55. 2026-10-18 03:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.2% · 87th percentile
  57. 2026-10-17 08:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-17 08:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  59. 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.2% · 87th percentile
  60. 2026-10-16 07:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-16 07:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  62. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.2% · 87th percentile
  63. 2026-10-15 06:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-15 06:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  65. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.2% · 87th percentile
  66. 2026-10-14 02:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-14 02:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  68. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.2% · 87th percentile
  69. 2026-10-12 22:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-12 22:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  71. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 3.2% · 87th percentile
  72. 2026-10-12 16:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-12 08:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-7mfp-8xjr-g749 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  74. 2026-10-11 19:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-11 17:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-32917?
CVE-2026-32917 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 31, 2026. OpenClaw before 2026.3.13 contains a remote command injection vulnerability in the iMessage attachment staging flow that allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands on configured remote hosts. The vulnerability exists because unsanitized remote attachment paths containing shell metacharacters…
When was CVE-2026-32917 made public?
CVE-2026-32917 was made public on March 14, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on March 31, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of July 25, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-32917 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-32917 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 2.0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (81st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-32917?
CVE-2026-32917 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-32917?
A fix for CVE-2026-32917 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-32917

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-32917?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.