UltraJSON is a fast JSON encoder and decoder written in pure C with bindings for Python 3.7+. Versions 5.10 through 5.11.0 are vulnerable to buffer overflow or infinite loop through large indent handling. ujson.dumps() crashes the Python interpreter (segmentation fault) when the product of the indent parameter and the nested depth of the input exceeds INT32_MAX. It can also get stuck in an infinite loop if the indent is a large negative number. Both are caused by an integer overflow/underflow whilst calculating how much memory to reserve for indentation. And both can be used to achieve denial of service. To be vulnerable, a service must call ujson.dump()/ujson.dumps()/ujson.encode() whilst giving untrusted users control over the indent parameter and not restrict that indentation to reasonably small non-negative values. A service may also be vulnerable to the infinite loop if it uses a fixed negative indent. An underflow always occurs for any negative indent when the input data is at least one level nested but, for small negative indents, the underflow is usually accidentally rectified by another overflow. This issue has been fixed in version 5.12.0.
CVE-2026-32875
This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5%, top 62% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5(medium)
- EG Risk
- 65(Attend)EG Risk 65/100SSVC: Attend
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity75% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Remediate soon — notable exploitation risk. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 38%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
March 20, 2026
Last Modified
July 15, 2026
Advisory Details (6)
Auto-updated Jul 7, 20262449400 – (CVE-2026-32875) CVE-2026-32875 ultrajson: UltraJSON: Denial of Service via large indent parameter in JSON serialization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2449400Integer overflow handling large indent leads to buffer overflow or infinite loop · Advisory · ultrajson/ultrajson · GitHub
https://github.com/ultrajson/ultrajson/security/advisories/GHSA-c8rr-9gxc-jprvujson.dumps crashes when indent is large · Issue #700 · ultrajson/ultrajson · GitHub
https://github.com/ultrajson/ultrajson/issues/700commit 486bd4553dc4 (ultrajson/ultrajson)
Patch available: ultrajson/ultrajson 5.12.0 (contains commit 486bd4553dc4)
https://github.com/ultrajson/ultrajson/commit/486bd4553dc471a1de11613bc7347a6b318e37eaPatch Availability(1)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | python3-ujson (5.11.0-3ubuntu0.1) @ resolute | 2026-06-30 | ubuntu |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| ujson | 5.1.0 ... 5.9.0 (11 versions) | 5.12.0 | — |
Weakness Classification(3)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
All Vendor Advisories
(1)
Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 45× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-27 14:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 03:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-18 06:59 UTCOSV refresh
- 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 20 moreShow fewer
- 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-06-30 04:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-06-30 04:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-06-30 04:32 UTCNVD updatefirst tracked
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownubuntu
- CVE-2004-0989EG 10.0EPSS p97HIGH
- CVE-2004-0990EG 10.0EPSS p98HIGH
- CVE-2004-1010EG 10.0EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2004-0941EG 10.0EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2004-0981EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2004-0882EG 10.0EPSS p96HIGH
- CVE-2004-0888EG 10.0EPSS p95HIGH
- CVE-2004-1012EG 10.0EPSS p93HIGH
- CVE-2004-1013EG 10.0EPSS p92HIGH
- CVE-2004-1018EG 10.0EPSS p97HIGH
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-190 · CWE-787
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-32875?
When was CVE-2026-32875 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-32875 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-32875?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-32875?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-32875
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-32875?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.