CVE-2026-32751

CRITICALNVD 9.09.0
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.0 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.8% (58th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-13217 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3 (GitHub Security Advisories) · GO-2026-4706 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.8%CVSS: 9.0Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

SiYuan is a personal knowledge management system. In versions 3.6.0 and below, the mobile file tree (MobileFiles.ts) renders notebook names via innerHTML without HTML escaping when processing renamenotebook WebSocket events. The desktop version (Files.ts) properly uses escapeHtml() for the same operation. An authenticated user who can rename notebooks can inject arbitrary HTML/JavaScript that executes on any mobile client viewing the file tree. Since Electron is configured with nodeIntegration: true and contextIsolation: false, the injected JavaScript has full Node.js access, escalating stored XSS to full remote code execution. The mobile layout is also used in the Electron desktop app when the window is narrow, making this exploitable on desktop as well. This issue has been fixed in version 3.6.1.

CVSS v3
9.0
EG Score
9.0CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
57
EG Risk 57/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity90% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.8%
EPSS %ILE
58th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.0 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.8% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

March 19, 2026

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jul 27, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit, github_release.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Remote Code Execution via Stored XSS in Notebook Name - Mobile Interface · Advisory · siyuan-note/siyuan · GitHub

https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/security/advisories/GHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3
GitHub release Patch Available

Improve details

Patch available: siyuan-note/siyuan v3.6.1

https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/releases/tag/v3.6.1
GitHub commit

commit f6d35103f774 (siyuan-note/siyuan)

Fix landed in siyuan-note/siyuan commit f6d35103f774 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/commit/f6d35103f774b65e52f03e018649ff0e57924fb0

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-32751(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
gogithub.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Go(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel—
  • every version through 0.0.0-20260313024916-fd6526133bb3: no fix on record
  • every version on: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 62× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 220 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 120 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-12 16:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  3. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 58th percentile
  4. 2026-11-11 18:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-11 18:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  6. 2026-11-11 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 58th percentile
  7. 2026-11-10 19:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-10 19:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  9. 2026-11-10 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 58th percentile
  10. 2026-11-09 20:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-09 20:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  12. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 58th percentile
  13. 2026-11-08 21:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-08 21:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  15. 2026-11-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 58th percentile
  16. 2026-11-07 23:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-07 23:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  18. 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 58th percentile
  19. 2026-11-07 00:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-07 00:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  21. 2026-11-06 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 58th percentile
  22. 2026-11-06 05:55 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-11-06 01:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-06 01:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  25. 2026-11-05 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 58th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 02:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-05 02:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  3. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  4. 2026-11-04 04:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-04 04:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  6. 2026-11-03 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  7. 2026-11-03 05:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-03 05:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  9. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  10. 2026-11-02 06:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-02 06:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  12. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  13. 2026-11-01 07:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-01 07:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3 · GitHub severity MODERATE
  15. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  16. 2026-10-31 09:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-31 09:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3
  18. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  19. 2026-10-30 10:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-30 10:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3
  21. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  22. 2026-10-29 11:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-29 11:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3
  24. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  25. 2026-10-28 12:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-28 12:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3
  27. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  28. 2026-10-27 14:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-27 14:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3
  30. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  31. 2026-10-26 14:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-26 14:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3
  33. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  34. 2026-10-25 15:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3
  35. 2026-10-25 14:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3
  38. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  39. 2026-10-23 17:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-23 17:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3
  41. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  42. 2026-10-22 19:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-22 19:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3
  44. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  45. 2026-10-21 20:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-21 20:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3
  47. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  48. 2026-10-20 21:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-20 21:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3
  50. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  51. 2026-10-19 22:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-19 22:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3
  53. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  54. 2026-10-18 22:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-18 22:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3
  56. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  57. 2026-10-18 03:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-17 22:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-17 22:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3
  60. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  61. 2026-10-16 23:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-10-16 23:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3
  63. 2026-10-16 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 57th percentile
  64. 2026-10-15 20:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-10-15 20:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3
  66. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  67. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  68. 2026-10-14 14:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-14 14:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3
  70. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  71. 2026-10-13 14:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-10-13 14:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3
  73. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  74. 2026-10-12 15:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-12 15:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qr46-rcv3-4hq3

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-32751?
CVE-2026-32751 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on March 19, 2026. SiYuan is a personal knowledge management system. In versions 3.6.0 and below, the mobile file tree (MobileFiles.ts) renders notebook names via innerHTML without HTML escaping when processing renamenotebook WebSocket events. The desktop version (Files.ts) properly uses escapeHtml() for the same…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-32751 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-32751 was published on March 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of June 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-32751 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-32751 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.8% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (58th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-32751?
CVE-2026-32751 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.0 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-32751?
A fix for CVE-2026-32751 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-32751 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-32751

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-32751?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.